Re: The objective is . . .

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 1 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #69,637 by deSitter 12/18/02 12:29:07 PM Reply	Re: The objective is . . . Yes, it works, and you can even move to a new machine without much trouble - what I do is delete everything once Windows sputters to a start on the new machine in Safe Mode - delete all the system devices, etc. This has no effect on the running machine. When Windows restarts, one is treated to quite a show as the entire caboodle is reinstalled appropriate to the new machine. -drl
Post #69,748 by static 12/18/02 6:23:38 PM Reply	You mean delete all devices, don't you? That is, in the System Manager. Wade. "Ah. One of the difficult questions."
Post #69,779 by deSitter 12/18/02 9:19:46 PM Reply	Re: You mean delete all devices, don't you? No, I mean delete the system devices, the ones with the same icon as a DOS prompt :) (Sorry). Windows 9x has wonderful discovery code. It will install things in order until a reboot is needed, then continue onward - it's really impressive. The upshot is, if you know what you are doing, you can rip a drive out of a 9x machine and stick it in some random PC, and chances are it will be fully functional in a few hours. -drl

Well, isn't that a fine how-di-do? - (Andrew Grygus) - (21) - Dec. 18, 2002, 01:09:01 AM EST

Couple details, please - - (Ashton) - (6) - Dec. 18, 2002, 03:38:09 AM EST

The objective is . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (4) - Dec. 18, 2002, 12:15:49 PM EST

Re: The objective is . . . - (deSitter) - (2) - Dec. 18, 2002, 12:29:07 PM EST

You mean delete all devices, don't you? - (static) - (1) - Dec. 18, 2002, 06:23:38 PM EST

Re: You mean delete all devices, don't you? - (deSitter) - Dec. 18, 2002, 09:19:46 PM EST

Dunno if this will help. - (inthane-chan) - Dec. 18, 2002, 12:29:47 PM EST

Thanks all for nostrums - added to tool kit. -NT - (Ashton) - Dec. 21, 2002, 07:08:46 AM EST

Good Ideas are timeless! + >P1-166 search< question - (Ashton) - (9) - May 29, 2003, 04:52:20 AM EDT

P166 is it. - (Steve Lowe) - May 29, 2003, 10:39:19 AM EDT

Lemme check tonight - (jbrabeck) - May 29, 2003, 10:48:40 AM EDT

XCOPY vs. XCOPY32 - (deSitter) - (1) - May 29, 2003, 10:58:43 AM EDT

Thanks - clearer. -NT - (Ashton) - May 30, 2003, 04:54:24 PM EDT

Used P1-166 CPU - (orion) - (1) - May 29, 2003, 11:18:11 AM EDT

Thanks, Norman.. gotta get tuit. Eventually. -NT - (Ashton) - May 30, 2003, 04:50:24 PM EDT

.. but gang aft aglee - (Ashton) - May 30, 2003, 04:48:33 PM EDT

Ashton, are you still looking for the P-166? - (scoenye) - (1) - June 2, 2003, 02:34:51 PM EDT

Thanks, yes. Note in the \ufffdther - -NT - (Ashton) - June 3, 2003, 12:11:38 AM EDT

Just a follow-up on the original post. - (Andrew Grygus) - (3) - May 30, 2003, 06:45:09 PM EDT

Re: Just a follow-up on the original post. - (deSitter) - (2) - May 31, 2003, 02:34:41 PM EDT

Safe use and floppies? - (Andrew Grygus) - (1) - May 31, 2003, 03:17:20 PM EDT

Missing word - (deSitter) - May 31, 2003, 03:19:13 PM EDT

I've not seen any indication that would lead me to believe that I could say that.
94 ms