IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Here's a real solution.
Open the borders.

ALL the borders.

Let people emigrate to any country they like. Let them pick the labor laws they want to work under.

If capital can choose where to invest itself, then labor should be able to, as well... Until that happens, or we regulate capital flight to the same level we regulate the ability of people to move around the globe, this kind of crap will continue to happen.

Oh, and if we do institute something like this, then the first 60-80 years are going to be absolute HELL. It should get better after that, though.
"...the middle of fighting a war against religious extremism is not the time to do something offensive to God." - Some idiot.
New One other change
If we're going to have workplace safety laws, then all the goods sold here should be manufacutured in a facility that meets all these laws.
===
Microsoft offers them the one thing most business people will pay any price for - the ability to say "we had no choice - everyone's doing it that way." -- [link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=38978|Andrew Grygus]
New That would work - but . .
. . is entirely unacceptable. Many would not object to a predominantly Islamic U.S. with an economy 2 notches above India (which would be just a few notches above where it is now), but most of the people who live here now would consider that a less than ideal future.
[link|http://www.aaxnet.com|AAx]
New Like I said...
The first 60-80 years would be total hell.

The first thing that would happen is Africa, rural China+N. Korea, and a good part of the middle east would try to emigrate en masse to the U.S., Europe, and industrial Asia (Hong Kong, Japan, South Korea). Of course, this would totally destroy the economy of those regions. As soon as any area of the world showed a sign of significant economic deviation from the rest of the world, it would be swamped with immigrants, wiping out any economic differential.

OTOH, governments couldn't afford to treat their populace as badly as they do these days - as soon as they start, the populace would up and relocate en masse, depriving the governments of their power base, plus potential productivity/tax income. Businesses would see their labor pool shrink and costs rise - encouraging them to actually care for their workers.

Yeah, it would suck for those of us who have grown used to a more opulent lifestyle, but ultimately I believe that the way of life practiced in the U.S. is unsustainable over a long period of time - and for me, I'm referring to 1000+ years, NOT the next 50 or so.
"...the middle of fighting a war against religious extremism is not the time to do something offensive to God." - Some idiot.
New So what you're really advocating is...
... a least common denominator economy, where, as soon as a region shows improvement above that crushing LCD, the teeming hoards of unproductive, underproductive, or incompetent labor swarm in and crush the differential completely.

Followed shortly by the exploiters whose only purpose in life would be to exploit that influx.

Nice! But I think I'll pass, thankyewverymuch!

Can you say "early 20th century Bolshevism"? I knew you could...
jb4
"They lead. They don't manage. The carrot always wins over the stick. Ask your horse. You can lead your horse to water, but you can't manage him to drink."
Richard Kerr, United Technologies Corporation, 1990
New Naw.
I'm just advocating the exact same laws for labor as are availible for capital. Now if you want, we could impose the exact same laws for the migration of capital that are currently imposed on the movement of labor - since basically, as long as the "wealthy" have the right to take their capital somewhere else, but those actually doing the work (which, in a sense IS their capital) can't take it anywhere else but where they are...

Then we'll continue to have situations like what's happening in the U.S. today.

I don't see an easy way out of it. It sucks, but basically the U.S. is screwed, and there ain't much that's going to be done about it because those with power can just start exploiting somebody else.
"...the middle of fighting a war against religious extremism is not the time to do something offensive to God." - Some idiot.
     this will make you sick - (lincoln) - (34)
         Why should it??? -NT - (CRConrad) - (12)
             Because - (lincoln) - (11)
                 Yeah, but *why* should that make anyone "feel sick"?!? - (CRConrad) - (1)
                     Riddle me this, Batman: - (lincoln)
                 Alternatively: Isn't that what your system is all about? - (CRConrad) - (8)
                     Watiaminnit - (drewk) - (4)
                         Chicken / egg? - (Ashton) - (2)
                             That doesn't follow - (drewk) - (1)
                                 Bingo, I think too. - (Ashton)
                         Yeah, OK, so I may have mischaracterised the problem. - (CRConrad)
                     {cackle guffaw} Ulp. - (Ashton) - (2)
                         Alas, it ain't no better here. - (CRConrad) - (1)
                             Well then: ___We Will All Go Together When We Go - (Ashton)
         Legislation - (deSitter) - (11)
             Not likely in a Global Economy. - (Andrew Grygus) - (10)
                 Heh.. The "Boys From Brazil" ___Study HVAC -NT - (Ashton)
                 Re: Not likely in a Global Economy. - (deSitter) - (8)
                     Here's a real solution. - (inthane-chan) - (5)
                         One other change - (drewk)
                         That would work - but . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (3)
                             Like I said... - (inthane-chan) - (2)
                                 So what you're really advocating is... - (jb4) - (1)
                                     Naw. - (inthane-chan)
                     Yes, unions were extremely effective . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (1)
                         Re: Yes, unions were extremely effective . . . - (deSitter)
         Sick? No, pleased that other companies are doing it - (wharris2)
         Same thing happened to the clothing industry - (orion)
         Yeah - (tuberculosis) - (6)
             So, tell us: Which one is it? -NT - (CRConrad) - (4)
                 Panama - Bocas del Toro -NT - (tuberculosis) - (3)
                     UM "Because it's ALREADY been illegally attacked by the US"? -NT - (CRConrad) - (2)
                         Plant a teak farm - pay no taxes for 20 years. -NT - (tuberculosis) - (1)
                             Thank Gawd - (Ashton)
             Not a bad idea -NT - (deSitter)

Don't touch that button!
103 ms