The training grounds of our Selected Resident.

Post #47,898 by Ashton 8/2/02 7:26:55 PM Reply	The training grounds of our Selected Resident.
Post #47,913 by deSitter 8/2/02 8:44:06 PM Reply	Re: The training grounds of our Selected Resident. I don't like Bush, lord I detest the man, but this kind of smarmy answer is uncalled for. Does it stand for anything other than being contemptuous of the target? What did that have to do with Bush? Did you read Dreisser's "American Tragedy"? These things didn't start when Clinton slithered out of town. The FATE of the country does not lie by a hanging chad. I think what enrages some people about both the left AND the right is their supreme ignorance of the permanence and continuity of life and infantile self-adsorption. The article was about the stupidity and inhumanity of valueless bureaucracy. If Bush himself is stupid (yes) and inhuman (no), nevertheless it is irrelevant to the text. -drl
Post #47,920 by a6l6e6x 8/2/02 9:29:51 PM Reply	Why? Diane D. Rath is Chair and Commissioner representing the public for the Texas Workforce Commission. [link\|http://www.twc.state.tx.us/twcinfo/twcbio.html\|Governor George W. Bush appointed her] in 1996. Alex "Television: chewing gum for the eyes." -- Frank Lloyd Wright
Post #47,923 by Ashton 8/2/02 9:41:13 PM Reply	Governors set the tone for a State's government. In theory. Bush governed Texas. His attitude towards the perfection of Texas' judicial system is exemplified by his unwillingness to grant any exceptions to (Texas' highest of all states' execution rate). As of last year there remained at least one person on Texas' death row, waiting still to present exculpatory DNA evidence. He may or may not be dead today. (If the facts were reported with the accuracy claimed). Texas' judicial system sets the basis for the above story, that department's policies - and their persistence: only massive public outcry caused any deviation - and the new rules will Not be applied to others in similar circumstances. (If the facts were reported with the accuracy claimed) Bush left there to govern US. Is that relevant-smarmy enough? Speaking of smarmy - who mentioned Clinton gratuitously - what did he do to, for, about Texas? Self-adsorption - is that about Yuppie lifestyles or political slogans. I know Dreiser. This is more Vidal. Did you read In The American Grain or It Can't Happen Here ? Ashton
Post #48,001 by mmoffitt 8/4/02 12:06:19 AM Reply	My I never cross swords with you ;-)
Post #48,047 by tablizer 8/4/02 3:02:09 PM Reply	Gush? re: "The training grounds of our Selected Resident" Stop complaining about the Florida thing, will ya? It was a very close call and both sides have some suspicious actions on their list. What do you want, a tie? Two presidents? One half Gore and one half Bush? Should it be called Gush or Bore? Enuf already. ________________ oop.ismad.com
Post #48,098 by Ashton 8/5/02 5:56:55 AM Reply	Then stop missing the point - It ain't about the "better" of the two - it's about a USSC coup d'etat: which to perform, the Five had to act in opposition to all previous of their own rulings re state/fed power. My opinion? yes - but also that of a number of Demo and Repo Head Legal profs in very Expen$ive Universities. that's Four + Scalia's puppet A coup is not to be later dismissed as an 'aberration'; not worry pretty litttle heads - not given our Constitution. This was blatant. Ashton

Welcome to IWETHEY!