IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 1 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Wegman.
WegmanWorld:

I am often asked if I miss working with the big camera. No.

I like working with the digital Hasselblad with the huge files, and the fact that all the lighting, equipment, printers and computers are here in my studio. I don't have to deal with lugging this beast around the woods of Maine or trekking to Soho with the dogs every time I want to use it. I do miss working with John Reuter and other tech assistants I got to know and love at the 20 x 24 studio.

And I miss seeing the curve in the lives of each dog under the scrutiny of one lens. The most hauntingly sweet and surprisingly poignant aspect of looking through these boxes of polaroids is seeing, because I am searching through the photos in reverse, my dogs Penny, Bobbin, Chip, Chundo, Batty, Crooky and Fay, all growing younger and younger.


If one can't get the shot, it really doesn't matter how "beautiful" the equipment and technique are.

Cheers,
Scott.
New Nope.. 'Art' doesn't 'work' that way, methinks
THAT (displayed pic) seen in front of face: is the result not merely of having anticipated.. Seen!... and 'SHOT' aka pressed shutter release.
It only began there, and while the fiddly-bits of Ansel's day consumed aeons of (a lifetime) and new techno RAW etc. gives easier access to unprecedented Power to influence the final viewable result:

The 'dodging' and other aspects of Ansel's decisions: were about demonstrating much-More of "what was There if you had Eyes + a brain making infinite auto-corrections."
He was striving for bringing as much of that mind's-eye experience to paper as all his talents could manage.

That's Art, based upon n-skills and a fine mind. And the medium IS the 'message': you haven't experienced Ansel without seeing His Print (in suitable lighting also, etc.)
IMhO, Nothing that 'meets-the-eye' in some moment IS ever simply-transmissible. And I am unanimous in that

;^>
     Andy Rubin's "Essential" phone. - (Another Scott) - (12)
         My company test phone is an iPhone SE. - (mmoffitt) - (9)
             Yeah, digital images are pretty crappy... - (Another Scott) - (5)
                 Re: aren't obsolete in 2 years. - (mmoffitt)
                 That was a comparison. - (mmoffitt) - (3)
                     Would it? - (pwhysall)
                     Wegman. - (Another Scott) - (1)
                         Nope.. 'Art' doesn't 'work' that way, methinks - (Ashton)
             What pish. - (pwhysall) - (1)
                 And while one is extremely valuable and the other near worthless is addressed in that very letter. -NT - (mmoffitt)
             GMTA.. had one of those while 'deciding' which? to try-to-Abide - (Ashton)
         Curious - (pwhysall) - (1)
             Always appreciate your Reviews, Peter - (Ashton)

Powered by orbiting brain lasers!
69 ms