IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Yeah, digital images are pretty crappy...
NASA -



;-)

Cheers,
Scott.
(Who likes the idea of handheld computers, but wishes they would stabilize a little so they aren't obsolete in 2 years.)
New Re: aren't obsolete in 2 years.
Never happen in a capitalist society. ;0)
bcnu,
Mikem

It's mourning in America again.
New That was a comparison.
This is nice.


But the seeing the actual photograph would be far better.
bcnu,
Mikem

It's mourning in America again.
New Would it?
Why?

If you read Ansel's books, you'll know that he was a master in the darkroom. He was a master in the darkroom because the process of printing from the glass negatives required dealing with precisely one million different kinds of annoying bullshit, due to limitations in film and chemistry. He had to become great at dodging and burning and farting about with chemicals, because if he didn't, his prints would be ass.

I have seen this picture - The Tetons and The Snake River - many times, and I have spent a long time considering it. What makes it great? The composition. The use of light. The sense of distance and scale. The encapsulation of the character of a wilderness that is both beautiful and savagely ready to kill you.

There's an artisanal, craftsmanlike element, too: the work done to ensure that the detail in the river is preserved as well as the bright bit in the middle, the masterful use of the zone system to establish the correct exposure, etc. yadda and so on.

But that's like getting interested in the brushes that Leonardo used to paint the Mona Lisa.
New Wegman.
WegmanWorld:

I am often asked if I miss working with the big camera. No.

I like working with the digital Hasselblad with the huge files, and the fact that all the lighting, equipment, printers and computers are here in my studio. I don't have to deal with lugging this beast around the woods of Maine or trekking to Soho with the dogs every time I want to use it. I do miss working with John Reuter and other tech assistants I got to know and love at the 20 x 24 studio.

And I miss seeing the curve in the lives of each dog under the scrutiny of one lens. The most hauntingly sweet and surprisingly poignant aspect of looking through these boxes of polaroids is seeing, because I am searching through the photos in reverse, my dogs Penny, Bobbin, Chip, Chundo, Batty, Crooky and Fay, all growing younger and younger.


If one can't get the shot, it really doesn't matter how "beautiful" the equipment and technique are.

Cheers,
Scott.
New Nope.. 'Art' doesn't 'work' that way, methinks
THAT (displayed pic) seen in front of face: is the result not merely of having anticipated.. Seen!... and 'SHOT' aka pressed shutter release.
It only began there, and while the fiddly-bits of Ansel's day consumed aeons of (a lifetime) and new techno RAW etc. gives easier access to unprecedented Power to influence the final viewable result:

The 'dodging' and other aspects of Ansel's decisions: were about demonstrating much-More of "what was There if you had Eyes + a brain making infinite auto-corrections."
He was striving for bringing as much of that mind's-eye experience to paper as all his talents could manage.

That's Art, based upon n-skills and a fine mind. And the medium IS the 'message': you haven't experienced Ansel without seeing His Print (in suitable lighting also, etc.)
IMhO, Nothing that 'meets-the-eye' in some moment IS ever simply-transmissible. And I am unanimous in that

;^>
     Andy Rubin's "Essential" phone. - (Another Scott) - (12)
         My company test phone is an iPhone SE. - (mmoffitt) - (9)
             Yeah, digital images are pretty crappy... - (Another Scott) - (5)
                 Re: aren't obsolete in 2 years. - (mmoffitt)
                 That was a comparison. - (mmoffitt) - (3)
                     Would it? - (pwhysall)
                     Wegman. - (Another Scott) - (1)
                         Nope.. 'Art' doesn't 'work' that way, methinks - (Ashton)
             What pish. - (pwhysall) - (1)
                 And while one is extremely valuable and the other near worthless is addressed in that very letter. -NT - (mmoffitt)
             GMTA.. had one of those while 'deciding' which? to try-to-Abide - (Ashton)
         Curious - (pwhysall) - (1)
             Always appreciate your Reviews, Peter - (Ashton)

Hard science if ever there was.
69 ms