IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Ehh
Side show distraction.
How much does it affect the corner lot?
How much do they sell? >500 trees?
Tree costs between 20-100, let's average to 40.
40 * 500 = 20,000 for the threshold of paying and tracking.

$20K - assume $10K profit BEFORE accounting for time spent or hiring someone to man the lot for 1 month. Or cost of the lot.

Assume cost of lot for $2K for the month (I just made that up, is it reasonable?).
Lot / sales guy paid $10 per hour * 60 hours per week * 4 weeks = $2,400.

So assume around $5,500 income for the month's sales if hiring someone to help, else it is worth around $8K for the month if doing it yourself.

How many people cross the threshold, feel the bite, and is it enough to matter to them individually, as opposed to the trivial amount the big guys feel.

And they will probably slap a ticket on the tree explaining the $5 price increase is due to the amount of overhead they have in dealing with the law, and make $4.85 more profit per tree. Like gas price increases get buried in the taxes.

Nah, doesn't bother me. Entertains yes, bothers, no. Too small to matter in either revenue or individual pain experienced. But is a sideshow distraction.
New Lost my post eariler - but I agree with BP
This is definitely scope creep.

Some Industry Counsel lobbied and got a "tax|fee|money" on their industry so they could promote the industry. My initial thought - isn't that what the Industry Counsel is for? That's why industry counsels charge memberships/fees so that they can go buy airtime for their industry.

These guys got everyone in the industry...even those who don't belong to the counsel and may have no trouble selling their stock...to pay this tax|fee|money.

That said, those decrying Obama for doing this would be the same ones proposing said fee if they were in power. Their "Is a new tax on Christmas trees the best President Obama can do?" is pure hypocrisy. REPUBLICANS passed the 1996 "Commodity Promotion, Research and Information Act". http://www.govtrack....pd?bill=h104-2854

Wah! Obama is doing what Congress said the President CAN do and HAS BEEN DOING!
New And has been doing
might as well include the links.
Here are links to all current national Research and Promotion Programs

Beef – Cattlemen’s Beef Promotion and Research Board http://www.beefboard.org/
Blueberries – U.S. Highbush Blueberry Council http://www.blueberry.org/
Cotton: The Cotton Board http://www.cottonboard.org/
Dairy -- National Dairy Promotion and Research Board http://www.dairychec...om/DairyCheckoff/
Eggs – American Egg Board http://www.aeb.org
Fluid Milk – National Fluid Milk Processor Promotion Board http://www.whymilk.com/
Hass Avocados – Hass Avocado Board http://www.avocadocentral.com/abouthab/
Honey – National Honey Board http://www.nhb.org/
Lamb – American Lamb Board http://www.americanlambboard.org/
Mangos – National Mango Board http://www.nationalmangoboard.com/
Mohair – Mohair Council of America http://www.mohairusa.com/
Mushrooms – Mushroom Council http://www.mushroomcouncil.org/
Peanuts – National Peanut Board http://www.nationalpeanutboard.org/
Popcorn – Popcorn Board http://www.popcorn.org/
Pork National Pork Board http://www.pork.orgPork Checkoff
Potatoes – U.S. Potato Board http://www.healthypotato.com/
Soybeans – United Soybean Board http://www.unitedsoybean.org/
Watermelon – National Watermelon Promotion Board http://www.watermelon.org/


Source: http://www.soybeanch....com/programs.htm

BTW: Look at the co-sponors of the original bill. One name did jump out at me: John Boehner.
     Really???? - (beepster) - (21)
         You'll have to do better than the Heritage Foundation. - (mmoffitt) - (2)
             Re: You'll have to do better than the Heritage Foundation. - (beepster) - (1)
                 That's better. -NT - (mmoffitt)
         Re: Really???? - (pwhysall) - (1)
             I think you're on to something there - (hnick)
         Church and state? Naaah . . . - (Andrew Grygus)
         This is why we can't have nice things. - (Another Scott) - (13)
             Eh, fork the Christmas Tree industry. - (S1mon_Jester) - (1)
                 Yep. All the way. - (beepster)
             Response Beep? - (crazy) - (10)
                 Where you stand depends on where you sit. - (Another Scott) - (5)
                     Even if not a "tax" - (beepster) - (3)
                         Ehh - (crazy) - (2)
                             Lost my post eariler - but I agree with BP - (S1mon_Jester) - (1)
                                 And has been doing - (S1mon_Jester)
                     I will take 3 for the win -NT - (boxley)
                 Re: Response Beep? - (lincoln) - (3)
                     His usage sucks as well - (crazy) - (2)
                         Re: His usage sucks as well - (beepster) - (1)
                             Well, I agree with them on it for the most part - (crazy)
         No, NOT Really - (lincoln)

This movie doesn't scrape the bottom of the barrel. This movie isn't the bottom of the barrel. This movie isn't below the bottom of the barrel. This movie doesn't deserve to be mentioned in the same sentence with barrels.
40 ms