beating the straw man with the red herring again?

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #322,600 by boxley 3/9/10 2:31:49 PM Reply	beating the straw man with the red herring again? I did not post any of your assertions 1-6 7 is a bogus premise made upon a false assertion payment for carbon sequestering is fine. Payment to algore and swiss banks for 3rd world dictators is not. The second was/is the copenhagen plan If we torture the data long enough, it will confess. (Ronald Coase, Nobel Prize for Economic Sciences, 1991)
Post #322,602 by drook 3/9/10 2:59:36 PM Reply	Cap and trade is trying to appease Republicans If someone proposes that the government pay directly for a specific solution to a problem, "free market" supporters argue that central planning doesn't work. Cap and trade has always been a bastardized mess designed to "allow the market to find the best solution". If someone proposed a way to directly pay companies to reduce emissions and/or increase sequestration, it would get shot down on a strict party-line vote. -- Drew
Post #322,627 by Silverlock 3/9/10 9:50:11 PM Reply	Herein you see the issue "Payment to algore" If Gore is for it, Box is against it. Science doesn't enter into it at all.
Post #322,629 by boxley 3/9/10 10:01:22 PM Reply	if gore wants money for it Im against it science be damned If we torture the data long enough, it will confess. (Ronald Coase, Nobel Prize for Economic Sciences, 1991)
Post #322,631 by Silverlock 3/9/10 10:04:07 PM Reply	Point made.

95% chance that Man is to blame for global warming - (lincoln) - (23) - March 8, 2010, 05:50:18 PM EST

heard on NPR about ten years ago... - (rcareaga) - (1) - March 8, 2010, 06:09:01 PM EST

7. Ergo, Vegans of the world Unite! - (Ashton) - March 8, 2010, 07:17:15 PM EST

Re: 95% chance that Man is to blame for global warming - (boxley) - (20) - March 8, 2010, 07:25:27 PM EST

Eh? - (Another Scott) - (19) - March 8, 2010, 08:41:12 PM EST

You don't understand - (rcareaga) - (7) - March 8, 2010, 09:22:24 PM EST

sorry to see you sick - (boxley) - (2) - March 8, 2010, 09:42:22 PM EST

Re: sorry to see you sick - (lincoln) - (1) - March 9, 2010, 01:20:29 PM EST

the code, not the compiler -NT - (boxley) - March 9, 2010, 01:28:47 PM EST

Skepticism is good, and necessary. - (Another Scott) - (3) - March 8, 2010, 10:34:03 PM EST

Re: Skepticism is good, and necessary. - (rcareaga) - (2) - March 8, 2010, 10:46:03 PM EST

I think he's not a lost cause. - (Another Scott) - (1) - March 8, 2010, 10:55:16 PM EST

noaa isnt a good source and wikipedia is? tough crowd -NT - (boxley) - March 9, 2010, 08:53:59 AM EST

sorry no wikiagwing allowed - (boxley) - (10) - March 8, 2010, 09:24:51 PM EST

Hmmm. - (Another Scott) - (9) - March 8, 2010, 10:26:08 PM EST

if c02 has risen by 65 ppm in the last 40 years - (boxley) - (8) - March 9, 2010, 09:01:04 AM EST

And why are those companies doing that work? -NT - (drook) - (7) - March 9, 2010, 09:49:42 AM EST

because they are AGW folks and want to make a dollar as well - (boxley) - (6) - March 9, 2010, 11:48:13 AM EST

Let's see if I've got this straight - (drook) - (5) - March 9, 2010, 02:14:10 PM EST

beating the straw man with the red herring again? - (boxley) - (4) - March 9, 2010, 02:31:49 PM EST

Cap and trade is trying to appease Republicans - (drook) - March 9, 2010, 02:59:36 PM EST

Herein you see the issue - (Silverlock) - (2) - March 9, 2010, 09:50:11 PM EST

if gore wants money for it Im against it science be damned -NT - (boxley) - (1) - March 9, 2010, 10:01:22 PM EST

Point made. -NT - (Silverlock) - March 9, 2010, 10:04:07 PM EST

Very small hands... and NO Vaseline.
53 ms