IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Were's our Oz contingent?
Isn't this election method used in Australia? Maybe we could get a description on how confusing it is/isn't in actual use.
With this much manure around, there must be a pony somewhere.
New Sorry, don't normally pay that much attention to this forum.
Yes, we use that system for our local electorates, but it's not called IRV here. Actually, we use slight variation: you number the candidates in order of most preferred to least preferred. Other than that, it is as has been described. In practice, many people either follow their party's "how-to-vote" card, or start with who they like least and work towards "1" that way. Have a rummage on [link|http://www.aec.gov.au/|The Australian Electoral Commision], in particular [link|http://www.aec.gov.au/pubs/factfiles/factsheet6.htm|this page] (upper house voting uses a different method). We get information every election about how it works and how your vote gets counted, etc.

I don't know now it would change US politics; there is an additional factor that attending a voting booth is legally compulsary in Australia.

Wade.

"All around me are nothing but fakes
Come with me on the biggest fake of all!"

     Election reform bubbling up from grass roots efforts - (Silverlock) - (29)
         article was confusing to me - (boxley) - (8)
             They should have given some examples - (drewk) - (7)
                 how about gore/bush ? -NT - (boxley) - (6)
                     Been trying to figure that out - (drewk) - (5)
                         First choice, second choice. - (Silverlock) - (3)
                             Ahh, got it - (drewk) - (2)
                                 No need - (ben_tilly)
                                 Good point - (Silverlock)
                         There is a simple resolution - (ben_tilly)
         Will people understand how it works? - (drewk) - (17)
             Were's our Oz contingent? - (Silverlock) - (1)
                 Sorry, don't normally pay that much attention to this forum. - (static)
             It is really quite simple - (ben_tilly) - (14)
                 Death of the two-party system - (Ric Locke) - (5)
                     Potentially a problem - (JayMehaffey) - (3)
                         Military power outside borders? - (wharris2)
                         POTENTIAL problem? - (ben_tilly) - (1)
                             The Robot or the Dummy? - (nking)
                     Bring back the Whigs! - (nking)
                 180 from Jackson. - (mmoffitt) - (7)
                     May have been the right solution for the time - (JayMehaffey)
                     Money == Power - (Brandioch) - (5)
                         Why no such system will ever be devised here. - (mmoffitt) - (4)
                             Cynical you are, Grasshopper. - (Brandioch) - (3)
                                 Even less than that. - (mmoffitt) - (2)
                                     In a static system, I'd agree with you. - (Brandioch) - (1)
                                         Yes. - (mmoffitt)
         <cartman>Kick ass</cartman> - (Brandioch)
         Let's watch this.... next. -NT - (Ashton)

I invited her up to my place for a little midnight bait. I said, "Come on, baby. It'll only take a few minnows." She threw me that same old line: "Not tonight, I've got a haddock."
100 ms