Sure does
And leads to the point people here keep making about WND. By your own standards they're fruitcakes. They keep advancing ideas that are clearly absurd, and facts that are quite simply not true. They do this so frequently, and so transparently, that most of us discount anything published there just because it's published there.
Anything I hear from WND that I haven't heard somewhere else first, my first response is not, "Gosh, I hadn't heard that. I wonder if it's true?" My response is, "I wonder what facts they're distorting in order to make that claim."
The modern version of "You're known by the company you keep" is "You're known by the sources you cite." I'll admit there are plenty of sites with an obvious liberal bias. But WND seems to be typical of a class of conservative sites that have not only a bias, but an M.O. of hammering incessantly on points that clearly have no merit.
Teach the controversy.
