IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New A Technology Review article from 2002.
http://beta.technolo...com/energy/12732/

Known reserves of natural gas, which is composed mainly of the simple hydrocarbon methane, will last for about 50 years at today's consumption rate. Estimates of likely but as yet undiscovered gas resources extend that projection to about 200 years. But when the natural gas thought to lie buried deep under the ocean in methane hydrates is added in, the potential is mind-boggling. Hydrates, ice crystals that trap methane molecules, form below a depth of 300 meters as a result of methane-producing bacteria. Very little is known about how much gas is bottled up in these crystals or how to get it out, but best guesses are that the reserves could, even with natural-gas consumption rates doubling over the next several decades, last tens of thousands of years.


Using natural gas for transportation will drive up the cost of the conventional stuff. As usual, there are issues with methane clathrate, too... http://en.wikipedia....Methane_clathrate

Cheers,
Scott.
New Isn't deep-sea methane the stuff ...
... that could destabilize and come up in huge "bubbles"? Why yes it is: http://www.marum.de/...he_sea_floor.html
--

Drew
     TTAC: The 2010 Prius is the anti-car. - (Another Scott) - (25)
         rather drive a ford, based on reading about the two vehices -NT - (boxley)
         Here's another Yuppie-class $45K entry from China - (Ashton) - (23)
             Innovator's Dilemma and Disruptive Technology - (drook) - (22)
                 That's why Tesla will probably stay around for a long time. - (static)
                 It won't be battery powered, either. - (pwhysall) - (20)
                     Chicken <-> egg - (drook) - (19)
                         I think we'll have fewer cars and more vehicle choices. - (Another Scott) - (18)
                             natural gas - (boxley) - (15)
                                 We use that for other things - (drook) - (7)
                                     take a look at supply charts - (boxley) - (6)
                                         Pretend I don't know how to read that chart - (drook) - (5)
                                             maybe this one - (boxley) - (2)
                                                 How are you doing the math? - (drook) - (1)
                                                     Re: How are you doing the math? - (boxley)
                                             A Technology Review article from 2002. - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                                 Isn't deep-sea methane the stuff ... - (drook)
                                 It's still burning stuff that's been in the ground for eons. - (Another Scott) - (6)
                                     well what the eff else are you going to burn? - (boxley) - (5)
                                         The carbon cycle and biofuels. - (Another Scott) - (4)
                                             not hardly - (boxley) - (3)
                                                 But there aren't enough of them . . . - (Andrew Grygus)
                                                 But ... - (drook) - (1)
                                                     on that point you are correct, so when are you buying - (boxley)
                             Nit: 10 per thousand in China -NT - (drook) - (1)
                                 Whoops. Thanks. -NT - (Another Scott)

I expected him to strike up a game of chess with Satan and start muttering about strawberries.
48 ms