Do you see who has to determine the violation?

Post #297,931 by beepster 10/13/08 5:02:40 PM Reply	Do you see who has to determine the violation? The personnel board. Same folks that Ms Palin has been recommending look into this matter all along. The folks that wrote this report CANNOT determine if she has violated the ethics laws. Its not within their power or scope of responsibility. They can SUGGEST that they think she MAY HAVE done something here...but they can do nothing else. So, this report cannot say that she broke the law...the group investigating does not have the authority to do that.
Post #297,934 by boxley 10/13/08 5:43:15 PM Reply	thats not how it works when a democrat accuses you if lemmy and god had a wrestling match who would win?
Post #297,936 by beepster 10/13/08 6:28:50 PM Reply	They spent so much time talking about it they had to come up with something...even if it was nothing...which it was. The trooper still has a job and an "at will" employee was dismissed. SCANDAL.
Post #297,937 by Another Scott 10/13/08 6:41:27 PM Reply	The investigator reported his findings. What is done with the findings is out of his hands. Cheers, Scott.
Post #297,939 by boxley 10/13/08 7:09:49 PM Reply	That wasnt the shouting above here She committed an offence!! was what you were declaiming earlier, why doncha admit that the "investigator" and "findings" were a political act by a committee without jurisdiction? nah, that would fair and balanced :-) only a few weeks before bob barr or ralph nader wins the election. thanx, bill if lemmy and god had a wrestling match who would win?
Post #297,940 by Another Scott 10/13/08 7:36:47 PM Reply	As you said, we've been through that before. You seem to have forgotten that I argued with you about the legality of the investigation and jurisdiction on Z. The committee had jurisdiction. The Alaska Supreme Court apparently agreed, since they refused to stop it (they'll give their reasons later) - http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=ap5f27TS7328&refer=us Try again? ;-) Cheers, Scott.
Post #297,942 by boxley 10/13/08 8:58:12 PM Reply	Once again, you quote that statute that claims personnel is the vehicle for the complaint then complain that the committee has jurisdiction when it doesnt. Go back and point out in the statute for those actions where the juidiciary committe has any jurisdiction. That is like the federal juidiciary investigating oil and gas shenanigans in the DOE entertaining but useless thanx, bill if lemmy and god had a wrestling match who would win?
Post #297,943 by Another Scott 10/13/08 8:59:17 PM Reply	It's on Z. No time now. :-)
Post #297,944 by boxley 10/13/08 9:01:35 PM Reply	you failed to make the argument there to anyones satisfaction but your own, you can flog that dead horse some more or admit you dont really understand alaskan statutes or wait till z comes up and ignore it there, besides I want to see if a 100 line rightshifted thread will crash this servelet :-) if lemmy and god had a wrestling match who would win?
Post #297,945 by Another Scott 10/13/08 9:06:26 PM Reply	We'll see. :-)
Post #297,946 by malraux 10/13/08 9:17:31 PM Reply	No, it won't. ;-) Regards, -scott <i>Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson.</i>
Post #297,953 by boxley 10/13/08 11:42:52 PM Reply	you sure? if lemmy and god had a wrestling match who would win?
Post #297,958 by mvitale 10/14/08 12:11:47 AM Reply	Sure. Or a reasonable semblance thereof. :) -Mike

Welcome to IWETHEY!