IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Theory and Practice of Programming Forum / Dunno what to tell you...
Post #231,747
by admin
Picture of admin
10/31/05 4:59:37 PM
Reply
New Dunno what to tell you...
Direct links if that helps:

http://www.mr-anderson.net/images/knr-csr.png
http://www.mr-anderson.net/images/bsd-csr.png
http://www.mr-anderson.net/images/whitesmith-csr.png
Regards,

-scott anderson

"Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Post #231,750
by Another Scott
10/31/05 5:10:10 PM
Reply
New www.mr-anderson.net could not be found...
Dunno. Adblock isn't blocking anything on Z. I'll try at home after the monsters are gone.

Cheers,
Scott.
Post #231,751
by pwhysall
Picture of pwhysall
10/31/05 5:11:10 PM
Reply
New Can you dig it?
As in:
ophelia:~/Temporary peter$ dig www.mr-anderson.net\n\n; <<>> DiG 9.2.2 <<>> www.mr-anderson.net\n;; global options:  printcmd\n;; Got answer:\n;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 29858\n;; flags: qr; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0\n\n;; QUESTION SECTION:\n;www.mr-anderson.net.           IN      A\n\n;; ANSWER SECTION:\nwww.mr-anderson.net.    38400   IN      A       66.80.246.91\n\n;; Query time: 12 msec\n;; SERVER: 10.200.1.50#53(10.200.1.50)\n;; WHEN: Mon Oct 31 22:10:47 2005\n;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 53

Peter
[link|http://www.no2id.net/|Don't Let The Terrorists Win]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Home]
Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
     Checking for the existence of a directory in Perl - (pwhysall) - (53) - Oct. 31, 2005, 08:58:57 AM EST
         I use: - (admin) - (52) - Oct. 31, 2005, 09:19:47 AM EST
             Context - (pwhysall) - (51) - Oct. 31, 2005, 09:30:44 AM EST
                 Re: Context - (admin) - (5) - Oct. 31, 2005, 10:18:59 AM EST
                     Moochos grassy arse. -NT - (pwhysall) - Oct. 31, 2005, 10:26:40 AM EST
                     And I would point out that... - (ben_tilly) - (3) - Oct. 31, 2005, 11:30:32 AM EST
                         How to do that... - (admin) - (2) - Oct. 31, 2005, 02:21:34 PM EST
                             That works but... - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Oct. 31, 2005, 03:07:35 PM EST
                                 Ah, good. Thanks. -NT - (admin) - Oct. 31, 2005, 04:03:49 PM EST
                 Minor points - (ben_tilly) - (44) - Oct. 31, 2005, 11:50:58 AM EST
                     Re: Minor points - (pwhysall) - Oct. 31, 2005, 01:02:42 PM EST
                     Slightly OT: on brace style: - (admin) - (42) - Oct. 31, 2005, 02:25:54 PM EST
                         That's what I've been doing, but I'm a noob. - (Another Scott) - Oct. 31, 2005, 02:28:40 PM EST
                         No way, this is the shizzit - (jake123) - Oct. 31, 2005, 03:10:18 PM EST
                         Yes, that is the correct form - (tuberculosis) - Oct. 31, 2005, 03:29:44 PM EST
                         I've heard arguments for and against that - (ben_tilly) - (38) - Oct. 31, 2005, 03:37:28 PM EST
                             The arguments are simple - (tuberculosis) - (13) - Oct. 31, 2005, 03:40:07 PM EST
                                 Ah, an open mind. - (Yendor) - (1) - Oct. 31, 2005, 03:52:54 PM EST
                                     Yeah, but he's right. - (pwhysall) - Oct. 31, 2005, 03:56:51 PM EST
                                 Yes, we know you're strongly imprinted - (ben_tilly) - (10) - Oct. 31, 2005, 04:07:50 PM EST
                                     I'm interested in research too - (tuberculosis) - (4) - Oct. 31, 2005, 05:08:27 PM EST
                                         so K&R is wrong? Heretic BURN HIM! -NT - (boxley) - (1) - Oct. 31, 2005, 05:22:53 PM EST
                                             :-\ufffd :-\ufffd :-\ufffd :-\ufffd -NT - (jb4) - Oct. 31, 2005, 10:45:07 PM EST
                                         There's a lot of stuff at scholar.google.com - (Another Scott) - Oct. 31, 2005, 05:28:23 PM EST
                                         I think it depends on your visual habits. - (static) - Oct. 31, 2005, 09:48:21 PM EST
                                     Sidenote - (Simon_Jester) - (4) - Nov. 1, 2005, 09:29:21 AM EST
                                         Automate that Jalopy - (Yendor) - (2) - Nov. 1, 2005, 09:37:17 AM EST
                                             That's okay... - (Simon_Jester) - (1) - Nov. 1, 2005, 09:44:25 AM EST
                                                 np - (Yendor) - Nov. 1, 2005, 09:59:47 AM EST
                                         Yes, that's a PBP recommend :-) - (ben_tilly) - Nov. 1, 2005, 11:14:00 AM EST
                             I'm seeing comments that "Code Complete" addresses that - (Another Scott) - (15) - Oct. 31, 2005, 03:59:22 PM EST
                                 Where? - (ben_tilly) - (14) - Oct. 31, 2005, 04:06:37 PM EST
                                     CC2, pp 740-743 -NT - (Yendor) - (3) - Oct. 31, 2005, 04:13:13 PM EST
                                         I should finish reading it then - (ben_tilly) - (2) - Oct. 31, 2005, 05:28:44 PM EST
                                             Ar - (Yendor) - (1) - Oct. 31, 2005, 06:45:18 PM EST
                                                 I read the first one that way, the first time - (ben_tilly) - Nov. 1, 2005, 12:03:59 AM EST
                                     E.g. - (Another Scott) - (9) - Oct. 31, 2005, 04:16:39 PM EST
                                         What I see on that page: - (admin) - (8) - Oct. 31, 2005, 04:33:47 PM EST
                                             I see. - (Another Scott) - (7) - Oct. 31, 2005, 07:25:29 PM EST
                                                 Dunno what to tell you... - (admin) - (2) - Oct. 31, 2005, 04:59:37 PM EST
                                                     www.mr-anderson.net could not be found... - (Another Scott) - (1) - Oct. 31, 2005, 05:10:10 PM EST
                                                         Can you dig it? - (pwhysall) - Oct. 31, 2005, 05:11:10 PM EST
                                                 They work here. Check your browser/adblock. -NT - (pwhysall) - Oct. 31, 2005, 05:06:27 PM EST
                                                 For some reason reading text isn't so bad. - (admin) - (2) - Oct. 31, 2005, 09:36:57 PM EST
                                                     Would you be better off wearing a patch? -NT - (broomberg) - (1) - Oct. 31, 2005, 10:15:49 PM EST
                                                         Tried that for a bit. - (admin) - Oct. 31, 2005, 10:56:45 PM EST
                             It's not just "bad vision" - (admin) - (5) - Oct. 31, 2005, 04:02:21 PM EST
                                 I'm *so* playing you at pool, for money. -NT - (pwhysall) - (4) - Oct. 31, 2005, 04:04:13 PM EST
                                     Bastard. - (admin) - (1) - Oct. 31, 2005, 04:09:40 PM EST
                                         :-D -NT - (Another Scott) - Oct. 31, 2005, 04:17:42 PM EST
                                     ICLRPD: I'm *so* playing you at pool, for money. (new thread) - (Steve Lowe) - Oct. 31, 2005, 04:14:13 PM EST
                                     You're English. Isn't that advantage enough? -NT - (ben_tilly) - Oct. 31, 2005, 05:30:02 PM EST
                             It's a pretty print problem... - (ChrisR) - (1) - Oct. 31, 2005, 05:53:56 PM EST
                                 Code Complete reserves special criticism for that one -NT - (ben_tilly) - Oct. 31, 2005, 06:31:57 PM EST

Fighting and romance are weirdly similar in many ways. Two people lock eyes in a crowded room. Everybody can feel the intensity of the emotions between them. One of them suggests that they step outside. “Come on, just you and me.” It starts out dignified, but they end up rolling around, tearing at each other’s clothing.

Also, both fighting and romance tend to look a lot better in movies than they do in real life.
82 ms