Automate that Jalopy

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #231,859 by Yendor 11/1/05 9:37:17 AM Reply	Automate that Jalopy CVS allows you to run processes (like, say, Jalopy) when checking code in. Set this process up, create a team-agreed-upon standard style of formatting code, and then whenever you check code in, it will automatically be reformatted to project standards, no matter how it was coded. If you'd like to know the steps to do this, I'll go look up the reference I used to get it done for our project a few months back. Let me know. -YendorMike "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin, 1759 Historical Review of Pennsylvania
Post #231,861 by Simon_Jester 11/1/05 9:44:25 AM Reply	That's okay... We're on ClearCase (employer required) -- ClearCase does allow for scripts to run on check-in also That project was a while ago...onto other things. <shrug>
Post #231,866 by Yendor 11/1/05 9:59:47 AM Reply	np Every company is different, and we've all got our own unique requirements. -YendorMike "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin, 1759 Historical Review of Pennsylvania

Checking for the existence of a directory in Perl - (pwhysall) - (53) - Oct. 31, 2005, 08:58:57 AM EST

I use: - (admin) - (52) - Oct. 31, 2005, 09:19:47 AM EST

Context - (pwhysall) - (51) - Oct. 31, 2005, 09:30:44 AM EST

Re: Context - (admin) - (5) - Oct. 31, 2005, 10:18:59 AM EST

Moochos grassy arse. -NT - (pwhysall) - Oct. 31, 2005, 10:26:40 AM EST

And I would point out that... - (ben_tilly) - (3) - Oct. 31, 2005, 11:30:32 AM EST

How to do that... - (admin) - (2) - Oct. 31, 2005, 02:21:34 PM EST

That works but... - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Oct. 31, 2005, 03:07:35 PM EST

Ah, good. Thanks. -NT - (admin) - Oct. 31, 2005, 04:03:49 PM EST

Minor points - (ben_tilly) - (44) - Oct. 31, 2005, 11:50:58 AM EST

Re: Minor points - (pwhysall) - Oct. 31, 2005, 01:02:42 PM EST

Slightly OT: on brace style: - (admin) - (42) - Oct. 31, 2005, 02:25:54 PM EST

That's what I've been doing, but I'm a noob. - (Another Scott) - Oct. 31, 2005, 02:28:40 PM EST

No way, this is the shizzit - (jake123) - Oct. 31, 2005, 03:10:18 PM EST

Yes, that is the correct form - (tuberculosis) - Oct. 31, 2005, 03:29:44 PM EST

I've heard arguments for and against that - (ben_tilly) - (38) - Oct. 31, 2005, 03:37:28 PM EST

The arguments are simple - (tuberculosis) - (13) - Oct. 31, 2005, 03:40:07 PM EST

Ah, an open mind. - (Yendor) - (1) - Oct. 31, 2005, 03:52:54 PM EST

Yeah, but he's right. - (pwhysall) - Oct. 31, 2005, 03:56:51 PM EST

Yes, we know you're strongly imprinted - (ben_tilly) - (10) - Oct. 31, 2005, 04:07:50 PM EST

I'm interested in research too - (tuberculosis) - (4) - Oct. 31, 2005, 05:08:27 PM EST

so K&R is wrong? Heretic BURN HIM! -NT - (boxley) - (1) - Oct. 31, 2005, 05:22:53 PM EST

:-\ufffd :-\ufffd :-\ufffd :-\ufffd -NT - (jb4) - Oct. 31, 2005, 10:45:07 PM EST

There's a lot of stuff at scholar.google.com - (Another Scott) - Oct. 31, 2005, 05:28:23 PM EST

I think it depends on your visual habits. - (static) - Oct. 31, 2005, 09:48:21 PM EST

Sidenote - (Simon_Jester) - (4) - Nov. 1, 2005, 09:29:21 AM EST

Automate that Jalopy - (Yendor) - (2) - Nov. 1, 2005, 09:37:17 AM EST

That's okay... - (Simon_Jester) - (1) - Nov. 1, 2005, 09:44:25 AM EST

np - (Yendor) - Nov. 1, 2005, 09:59:47 AM EST

Yes, that's a PBP recommend :-) - (ben_tilly) - Nov. 1, 2005, 11:14:00 AM EST

I'm seeing comments that "Code Complete" addresses that - (Another Scott) - (15) - Oct. 31, 2005, 03:59:22 PM EST

Where? - (ben_tilly) - (14) - Oct. 31, 2005, 04:06:37 PM EST

CC2, pp 740-743 -NT - (Yendor) - (3) - Oct. 31, 2005, 04:13:13 PM EST

I should finish reading it then - (ben_tilly) - (2) - Oct. 31, 2005, 05:28:44 PM EST

Ar - (Yendor) - (1) - Oct. 31, 2005, 06:45:18 PM EST

I read the first one that way, the first time - (ben_tilly) - Nov. 1, 2005, 12:03:59 AM EST

E.g. - (Another Scott) - (9) - Oct. 31, 2005, 04:16:39 PM EST

What I see on that page: - (admin) - (8) - Oct. 31, 2005, 04:33:47 PM EST

I see. - (Another Scott) - (7) - Oct. 31, 2005, 07:25:29 PM EST

Dunno what to tell you... - (admin) - (2) - Oct. 31, 2005, 04:59:37 PM EST

www.mr-anderson.net could not be found... - (Another Scott) - (1) - Oct. 31, 2005, 05:10:10 PM EST

Can you dig it? - (pwhysall) - Oct. 31, 2005, 05:11:10 PM EST

They work here. Check your browser/adblock. -NT - (pwhysall) - Oct. 31, 2005, 05:06:27 PM EST

For some reason reading text isn't so bad. - (admin) - (2) - Oct. 31, 2005, 09:36:57 PM EST

Would you be better off wearing a patch? -NT - (broomberg) - (1) - Oct. 31, 2005, 10:15:49 PM EST

Tried that for a bit. - (admin) - Oct. 31, 2005, 10:56:45 PM EST

It's not just "bad vision" - (admin) - (5) - Oct. 31, 2005, 04:02:21 PM EST

I'm *so* playing you at pool, for money. -NT - (pwhysall) - (4) - Oct. 31, 2005, 04:04:13 PM EST

Bastard. - (admin) - (1) - Oct. 31, 2005, 04:09:40 PM EST

:-D -NT - (Another Scott) - Oct. 31, 2005, 04:17:42 PM EST

ICLRPD: I'm *so* playing you at pool, for money. (new thread) - (Steve Lowe) - Oct. 31, 2005, 04:14:13 PM EST

You're English. Isn't that advantage enough? -NT - (ben_tilly) - Oct. 31, 2005, 05:30:02 PM EST

It's a pretty print problem... - (ChrisR) - (1) - Oct. 31, 2005, 05:53:56 PM EST

Code Complete reserves special criticism for that one -NT - (ben_tilly) - Oct. 31, 2005, 06:31:57 PM EST

Does this make any sense to you?
82 ms