IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Mozilla 0.9.6
Kernel 2.4.16, PIII 800, 256MB memory.

I didn't have the TOC file, but the manual.html file loaded in 20 seconds.



Peter
Shill For Hire
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
New Did you compile that ?
I hate to think a PIII 800 is 5x faster than an Athlon 500, even if it sits on a 100 MHz FSB board. I grabbed the 0.9.6 source to see what difference it would make with an i686 compilation. Unfortunately, the default compile produces a binary that takes 440 s to render the manual and gobbles up 70-80 MB in the process, presumably because it is loaded with debug options and uses no optimization.

I'm now recompiling with all the debug options turned off and optimization set to -O2. See what that gives...
New Re: Did you compile that ?
Nope, grabbed the binary RPMs.

I *have* got the manual TOC file - couldn't see the wood for the trees, or something. manual_toc.html popped open in 1.06 seconds.


Peter
Shill For Hire
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
Expand Edited by pwhysall Dec. 16, 2001, 05:51:48 PM EST
New Re: Did you compile that ?
There is a reason 2.4.16 is sooo much faster....

I think the recent branching of the Kernel-Devel show that even Linus feels 2.4.x is at the point where it is at a maintenance level. The change in Memory Management, VM, OOM... many other enhancements to boot.

I saw a huge (subjective on my part) change in performance, just by going to 2.4.12 from 2.4.3. And in going from 2.4.7 to 2.4.14. AND going from 2.4.9 to 2.4.16.

I see alot of stability things got better the later the kernel.


greg, curley95@attbi.com -- REMEMBER ED CURRY!!!
In 2002, everyone will discover that everyone else is using linux. ** Linux: Good, fast AND cheap. ** Failure is not an option: It comes bundled with Windows. ** "Two rules to success in life: 1. Don't tell people everything you know." - Sassan Tat
New La(s)t(est) result
With -O2 and all debugging turned off: 41 s for the manual. Much, much better :) Kernel 2.4.16 vs 2.4.8 does not affect the result.
New Re: La(s)t(est) result
As I said about the speed improvement... they were subjective on my part. But really I guess it only comes into effect when there is a memory poor machine...


greg, curley95@attbi.com -- REMEMBER ED CURRY!!!
In 2002, everyone will discover that everyone else is using linux. ** Linux: Good, fast AND cheap. ** Failure is not an option: It comes bundled with Windows. ** "Two rules to success in life: 1. Don't tell people everything you know." - Sassan Tat
     Some browser benchmarks - (scoenye) - (19)
         Interesting. Thanks for posting the results! -NT - (a6l6e6x)
         Re: Some browser benchmarks - (pwhysall)
         Mozilla 0.9.6 - (pwhysall) - (5)
             Did you compile that ? - (scoenye) - (4)
                 Re: Did you compile that ? - (pwhysall)
                 Re: Did you compile that ? - (folkert)
                 La(s)t(est) result - (scoenye) - (1)
                     Re: La(s)t(est) result - (folkert)
         Galeon, size, why bother - (kmself) - (8)
             Eh? - (pwhysall) - (5)
                 Moz options - (kmself) - (4)
                     The point being... - (pwhysall) - (3)
                         Re: ...the sharp bit at the end - (kmself) - (2)
                             Now now - (static) - (1)
                                 Sure, send Karsten to Samoa or Peter to Afghanistan. :) - (a6l6e6x)
             A lot of baggage for a clean interface... - (scoenye)
             Ahhh all better - (folkert)
         Online refs? - (kmself) - (1)
             Hopefully here... - (scoenye)

From Cap'n Billy's Whizz Bang!
112 ms