IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Theory and Practice of Programming Forum / Update: he denies it
Post #192,119
by tablizer
1/28/05 3:43:54 PM
1/28/05 4:05:43 PM
Reply
New Update: he denies it
I sent him a message mentioning that the similarities seem suspicious, and he denies it.

However, he did agree to put a reference to my site at the very end, which perhaps is a way to protect his butt without admitting guilt.

I count roughly 14 similarities. In all the other anti-OO articles I have dug up, there was at best 1 or 2 things that remotely matched. That is a huge leap.

Maybe he found material written by me on various discussion groups without realizing it all came from the same person. There are not very many other dedicated anti-OO trolls.....I mean critics......out there.
________________
oop.ismad.com
Collapse Edited by tablizer Jan. 28, 2005, 04:05:43 PM EST
Update: he denies it
I sent him a message mentioning that the similarities seem suspicious, and he denies it.

However, he did agree to put a reference to my site at the very end, which perhaps is a way to protect his butt without admitting guilt.

I count roughly 14 similarities. In all the other anti-OO articles I have dug up, there was at best 1 or 2 things that remotely matched. That is a huge leap.
________________
oop.ismad.com
Collapse All History
     Here's one more for Bryce: - (CRConrad) - (28) - Jan. 25, 2005, 10:46:27 AM EST
         CRC error. Too late... already been pointed out. - (folkert) - Jan. 25, 2005, 11:18:26 AM EST
         Oh yeah - there's a gem - (tuberculosis) - (13) - Jan. 26, 2005, 12:19:09 AM EST
             Yeah, that's the one that struck me the most too. Sheesh! -NT - (CRConrad) - Jan. 26, 2005, 03:50:42 AM EST
             That guy needs to be shot. - (static) - (3) - Jan. 26, 2005, 06:44:32 PM EST
                 factoring frowned on - (tablizer) - (2) - Jan. 27, 2005, 01:32:33 AM EST
                     You might find this interesting... (new thread) - (Another Scott) - Jan. 27, 2005, 07:43:17 AM EST
                     ICLRPD (new thread) - (jb4) - Feb. 2, 2005, 07:04:55 PM EST
             Divide-and-Conquer - (tablizer) - (3) - Jan. 27, 2005, 01:23:40 AM EST
                 ! - (pwhysall) - (2) - Jan. 27, 2005, 01:25:07 AM EST
                     For machines, no. For humans, yes. -NT - (tablizer) - Jan. 27, 2005, 01:33:20 AM EST
                     Database is excellent IPC mechanism (new thread) - (tuberculosis) - Jan. 27, 2005, 09:40:05 AM EST
             I e-mailed him about the article - (bluke) - (3) - Jan. 27, 2005, 04:16:43 AM EST
                 That tells me he has *never* worked with cut-n-paste. -NT - (static) - (2) - Jan. 27, 2005, 06:59:18 AM EST
                     Sure he did - (broomberg) - (1) - Jan. 27, 2005, 09:30:24 AM EST
                         Never mind - (broomberg) - Jan. 27, 2005, 09:31:55 AM EST
         Damn! - (tablizer) - (6) - Jan. 26, 2005, 04:09:11 PM EST
             Go after him. - (admin) - (4) - Jan. 26, 2005, 06:16:44 PM EST
                 I sent him email asking for citation to be added -NT - (tablizer) - (3) - Jan. 27, 2005, 01:04:35 PM EST
                     Bah. - (admin) - (2) - Jan. 27, 2005, 01:44:08 PM EST
                         There's always time to escalate. - (imric) - (1) - Jan. 27, 2005, 02:10:10 PM EST
                             Update: he denies it - (tablizer) - Jan. 28, 2005, 04:05:43 PM EST
             What HE said ^^^ -NT - (imric) - Jan. 26, 2005, 09:32:52 PM EST
         32 - (systems) - (3) - Jan. 27, 2005, 03:46:43 AM EST
             OT: Tried to locate his books at Amazon - (Arkadiy) - (2) - Jan. 27, 2005, 09:31:18 AM EST
                 I found 2 of them - (bluke) - (1) - Jan. 27, 2005, 03:28:45 PM EST
                     I wanted to find all of them... -NT - (Arkadiy) - Jan. 27, 2005, 03:58:25 PM EST
         Here is his bio - (bluke) - Jan. 27, 2005, 04:28:43 AM EST
         According to the author - (bluke) - Jan. 27, 2005, 07:46:20 AM EST

If you realize that this is the result of 35 years of continuous development across a wide range of compute platforms, there's a certain sense to it. It's internally consistent with its development history. Not that it doesn't suck.
150 ms