Oh I *am* straddling both horses: You Picked Automatically.

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #16,930 by Ashton 11/6/01 4:06:32 PM Reply	Oh I am straddling both horses: You Picked Automatically. We cowboys have seen lots of cattle and sheep led to slaughter, and we are quite athletic except.. when jumping to a conclusion with eyes closed: we're too smart to fall for That one. Twice.
Post #16,936 by bepatient 11/6/01 4:14:42 PM Reply	No we're not... ...or haven't you noticed your decided lack of posts following the other horse. You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! _{Laurie Anderson} [link\|mailto:bepatient@aol.com\|BePatient]
Post #16,953 by Ashton 11/6/01 4:32:35 PM Reply	Must straddling be explained too? Only a lawyer would confuse the idea of Devil's Advocate with: sufficient data to determine who IS the 'Devil', in a certain postulated situation. It's only a useful ploy where enough facts are known - otherwise it's just cant, from prior Conviction. This entire thread could have been summarized yesterday with, "Last Post: We don't know enough yet, to guess which side is lying the more." But instead it has proven a rather spread-out Rorschak of personal proclivities, when only an imaginary scenario is available. Amazing what the character map of this unknown woman has become: without any knowledge of her! except an association with a political party. (Seems likely to be a true-factoid, that membership) Gosh - just like those Repubs to diss a Green. Just like those Greens to dis a Repub. Just like those Demos and Repubs.. to dis anyone with a mind. ..and we're supposed to be smarter than your average sheep! Baa Baa
Post #16,959 by bepatient 11/6/01 4:36:20 PM Reply	But I've given you my reasoning... ...do with it what you will. And its NOT just because she's Green and they are Authority. Shame that doesn't fit with what you believe me to be. You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! _{Laurie Anderson} [link\|mailto:bepatient@aol.com\|BePatient]
Post #16,982 by Ashton 11/6/01 5:04:13 PM Reply	Sorry: I must have believed my statistics. Too. :[

thought I would move a point over here from the terr forum - (boxley) - (88) - Nov. 5, 2001, 10:40:32 PM EST

Show me where it said she refused to be scanned. - (Brandioch) - (86) - Nov. 5, 2001, 10:51:16 PM EST

The actions of the folks at the airport... - (bepatient) - (32) - Nov. 5, 2001, 11:18:40 PM EST

I wasn't aware there was a zone there. - (Brandioch) - (7) - Nov. 6, 2001, 12:11:14 AM EST

do you practice being an idiot? - (bepatient) - (6) - Nov. 6, 2001, 12:18:11 AM EST

Allow me to quote from that article. - (Brandioch) - (5) - Nov. 6, 2001, 12:26:22 AM EST

I read that part... - (bepatient) - (2) - Nov. 6, 2001, 12:31:22 AM EST

Again, you fail to fulfill the request. - (Brandioch) - (1) - Nov. 6, 2001, 12:41:27 AM EST

yawn... - (bepatient) - Nov. 6, 2001, 12:50:03 AM EST

Since we're being pedantic - (drewk) - (1) - Nov. 6, 2001, 12:36:02 AM EST

Sure. - (Brandioch) - Nov. 6, 2001, 12:43:04 AM EST

Re: The actions of the folks at the airport... - (Ashton) - (23) - Nov. 6, 2001, 02:56:35 AM EST

Give me a break... - (bepatient) - (22) - Nov. 6, 2001, 07:59:44 AM EST

Rationality is beyond you. - (Brandioch) - (21) - Nov. 6, 2001, 01:37:25 PM EST

Was she "singled out"? - (Another Scott) - Nov. 6, 2001, 02:11:14 PM EST

You keep inventing rights... - (bepatient) - (19) - Nov. 6, 2001, 02:19:46 PM EST

The odd thing - (JayMehaffey) - Nov. 6, 2001, 02:55:18 PM EST

Your fear........ - (Brandioch) - (8) - Nov. 6, 2001, 02:56:18 PM EST

yawn...again - (bepatient) - (7) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:06:49 PM EST

Quote it. - (Brandioch) - (5) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:17:58 PM EST

yawn yet again - (bepatient) - (4) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:23:32 PM EST

Like I said, you wouldn't be able to do it. - (Brandioch) - (3) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:28:52 PM EST

Since you obviously are incapable... - (bepatient) - (2) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:59:30 PM EST

Yep: that IS what 'They' said. Not what 'She' said. Again. -NT - (Ashton) - (1) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:02:01 PM EST

yep... - (bepatient) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:20:03 PM EST

Bingo! again, you betcha "according to relevant Authority" \ufffd - (Ashton) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:22:46 PM EST

This is some MORE = NEW 'rewrite' of the same. Yet: - (Ashton) - (8) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:02:56 PM EST

Question authority? - (bepatient) - (7) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:17:13 PM EST

Yes, Authority *may* have told a truer? version here. - (Ashton) - (6) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:29:20 PM EST

Really simple... - (bepatient) - (5) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:01:46 PM EST

Oh I *am* straddling both horses: You Picked Automatically. - (Ashton) - (4) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:06:32 PM EST

No we're not... - (bepatient) - (3) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:14:42 PM EST

Must straddling be explained too? - (Ashton) - (2) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:32:35 PM EST

But I've given you my reasoning... - (bepatient) - (1) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:36:20 PM EST

Sorry: I must have believed my statistics. Too. :[ -NT - (Ashton) - Nov. 6, 2001, 05:04:13 PM EST

suppose - (boxley) - (52) - Nov. 5, 2001, 11:41:55 PM EST

Police State - (Brandioch) - (51) - Nov. 6, 2001, 12:01:03 AM EST

They didn't infringe upon her civil rights. - (bepatient) - Nov. 6, 2001, 12:04:41 AM EST

ya gotta pick yer fights - (boxley) - (49) - Nov. 6, 2001, 12:12:53 AM EST

And she picked her's. - (Brandioch) - (48) - Nov. 6, 2001, 12:20:16 AM EST

Cause she's an idiot... - (bepatient) - (47) - Nov. 6, 2001, 12:26:57 AM EST

You don't know what "detain" means.... - (Brandioch) - (46) - Nov. 6, 2001, 12:32:38 AM EST

Sure I do... - (bepatient) - (45) - Nov. 6, 2001, 12:48:34 AM EST

Reading with comprehension. - (Brandioch) - (44) - Nov. 6, 2001, 01:02:56 AM EST

Please refer to the quote... - (bepatient) - (43) - Nov. 6, 2001, 01:17:46 AM EST

Right to travel? - (andread) - (42) - Nov. 6, 2001, 11:23:09 AM EST

Thanks... - (bepatient) - Nov. 6, 2001, 01:03:59 PM EST

Um, you're posting in reply to Bill's comment. - (Brandioch) - (40) - Nov. 6, 2001, 01:53:53 PM EST

Nit - (Silverlock) - (28) - Nov. 6, 2001, 02:21:42 PM EST

SLAM! - (Brandioch) - (27) - Nov. 6, 2001, 02:58:48 PM EST

That's funny. - (Silverlock) - (20) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:09:13 PM EST

I'm glad you agree. - (Brandioch) - (17) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:15:36 PM EST

Those who will not see - (Silverlock) - (16) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:19:00 PM EST

In case of factual depletion, abandon discussion. - (Brandioch) - (15) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:34:10 PM EST

Talking past each other. - (Another Scott) - (9) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:47:26 PM EST

Nope. Looking at the whole situation. - (Brandioch) - (8) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:02:01 PM EST

You've apparently missed some things. - (Another Scott) - (7) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:16:25 PM EST

Prove it. - (Brandioch) - (6) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:23:14 PM EST

Spell it out. - (Another Scott) - (5) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:26:52 PM EST

I do not believe this. - (Brandioch) - (4) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:33:16 PM EST

You should... - (bepatient) - (2) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:42:01 PM EST

Reading WITH comprehension. - (Brandioch) - (1) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:45:10 PM EST

Sure.... - (bepatient) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:59:21 PM EST

The reason I asked... - (Another Scott) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:57:12 PM EST

Ahh...your MO... - (bepatient) - (4) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:10:51 PM EST

Compare the dates. - (Brandioch) - (3) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:25:13 PM EST

What...to your posts yesterday? - (bepatient) - (2) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:30:26 PM EST

Quote it. If you can. - (Brandioch) - (1) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:48:43 PM EST

Even if I quote it you'll ignore it. - (bepatient) - Nov. 6, 2001, 05:00:23 PM EST

Et tu Brute? - (Ashton) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:59:20 PM EST

did -NT - (boxley) - Nov. 6, 2001, 09:53:33 PM EST

Wrong. - (bepatient) - (4) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:11:21 PM EST

Ahhhh, it's another "detain" issue. - (Brandioch) - (2) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:26:00 PM EST

I see... - (bepatient) - (1) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:55:51 PM EST

Ha! (" do you practice being an idiot?") - (Brandioch) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:16:21 PM EST

How clairvoyant of you, BeeP - (Ashton) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:45:09 PM EST

didnt -NT - (boxley) - Nov. 6, 2001, 09:52:21 PM EST

She could have... - (bepatient) - (10) - Nov. 6, 2001, 02:24:02 PM EST

See above: thus far it is ALL 'formalized' hearsay of - (Ashton) - (9) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:17:51 PM EST

There are 2 accounts... - (bepatient) - (8) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:20:41 PM EST

Bill, you are telling a lie. - (Brandioch) - (7) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:31:21 PM EST

Keep nit-picking... - (bepatient) - (1) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:13:08 PM EST

"detained" - (Brandioch) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:21:31 PM EST

You need to do a little reading: - (tonytib) - (4) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:15:04 PM EST

Read my other posts. - (Brandioch) - (3) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:19:38 PM EST

She did not... - (bepatient) - (2) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:25:31 PM EST

Which was my point. - (Brandioch) - (1) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:47:47 PM EST

No it wasn't. -NT - (bepatient) - Nov. 6, 2001, 05:01:11 PM EST

heh..only thing I know is... - (Simon_Jester) - Nov. 7, 2001, 03:35:35 PM EST

iwethey.org

Not the sharpest knives in the drawer by far.
294 ms