actually you can do both

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #148,351 by boxley 3/24/04 9:30:18 PM Reply	actually you can do both If I am local to the box I can have a shadowed passwd and a different NIS passwd and flag which to use. An example of such is recovery of a root passwd when an admin has been removed and the NIS maintainers cannot be reached in an emergency. thanx, bill In Bush\ufffds America, fighting terrorism abroad is used as a pretext for vanquishing civil liberties at home. David Podvin questions, help? [link\|mailto:pappas@catholic.org\|email pappas at catholic.org]
Post #148,356 by ben_tilly 3/24/04 9:36:54 PM Reply	I was wondering about that... My assumption was that Peter was right in [link\|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=148144\|http://z.iwethey.org...?contentid=148144] that the two couldn't be used at the same time. Bad assumption, but I didn't claim to be an admin. (Quite the contrary in fact.) Also it is still true that they can't be used at the same time on the same account. And that is true for exactly the reason that I gave. Cheers, Ben "good ideas and bad code build communities, the other three combinations do not" - [link\|http://archives.real-time.com/pipermail/cocoon-devel/2000-October/003023.html\|Stefano Mazzocchi]
Post #148,430 by pwhysall 3/25/04 1:57:09 AM Reply	I should have been more specific. Sorry for any confusion. The point stands, though. Peter [link\|http://www.debian.org\|Shill For Hire] [link\|http://www.kuro5hin.org\|There is no K5 Cabal] [link\|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org\|Blog]
Post #148,394 by admin 3/24/04 10:50:56 PM Reply	PAM does that too, IIRC You set the rules to look in NIS first, local second. Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."

One way to filter for technical people :-) - (ben_tilly) - (93) - March 23, 2004, 06:18:59 PM EST

"Fearlessness"? - (Another Scott) - (17) - March 23, 2004, 06:21:22 PM EST

Yeah, that and a digital certificate. - (jb4) - (14) - March 23, 2004, 06:41:28 PM EST

Easy peasy. - (admin) - (13) - March 23, 2004, 06:44:55 PM EST

man?!? - (jb4) - (12) - March 23, 2004, 06:50:13 PM EST

Then I suspect you don't qualify anyway... ;-) -NT - (admin) - (3) - March 23, 2004, 06:49:16 PM EST

Guilty as charged.... - (jb4) - (2) - March 23, 2004, 06:51:53 PM EST

Debian. - (admin) - (1) - March 23, 2004, 06:53:28 PM EST

Just found out that SuSE 9.1's got it - (jb4) - March 24, 2004, 05:15:12 PM EST

And we see that their filter worked - (ben_tilly) - (7) - March 23, 2004, 07:56:49 PM EST

two implementations of man, more or less - (boxley) - (1) - March 23, 2004, 08:54:24 PM EST

That makes sense -NT - (ben_tilly) - March 23, 2004, 08:58:42 PM EST

$ echo $PAGER - (Arkadiy) - (3) - March 24, 2004, 01:39:25 PM EST

That can't be it - (ben_tilly) - (1) - March 24, 2004, 02:30:51 PM EST

Then you have sensible default - (Arkadiy) - March 24, 2004, 02:48:22 PM EST

How ironic your .sig is in this thread.....**giggle** -NT - (jb4) - March 24, 2004, 05:18:08 PM EST

As I already admitted to Scott... - (jb4) - March 24, 2004, 05:17:10 PM EST

Deploy wireless network? - (broomberg) - (1) - March 23, 2004, 06:47:30 PM EST

ROTFL -NT - (ben_tilly) - March 23, 2004, 08:01:58 PM EST

Is this for real? - (deSitter) - (1) - March 23, 2004, 08:17:25 PM EST

Unless the position is already filled, it should be real - (ben_tilly) - March 23, 2004, 08:58:08 PM EST

would look into it but - (boxley) - March 23, 2004, 08:57:17 PM EST

Could also be. . . - (morganek) - (2) - March 23, 2004, 10:04:52 PM EST

Go through process.... - (pwhysall) - (1) - March 24, 2004, 01:49:02 AM EST

Sent my pubkey - no response -NT - (deSitter) - March 24, 2004, 11:54:06 AM EST

Hhhmmmmmmm - (orion) - (35) - March 23, 2004, 10:19:43 PM EST

You don't qualify - (ben_tilly) - (34) - March 23, 2004, 10:46:43 PM EST

Maybe I do, maybe I don't - (orion) - (33) - March 24, 2004, 10:21:51 AM EST

If you think that you qualify... - (ben_tilly) - (8) - March 24, 2004, 11:04:14 AM EST

Why be proven wrong when you don't have to? -NT - (mmoffitt) - March 24, 2004, 11:08:07 AM EST

I have to do something first - (orion) - (6) - March 24, 2004, 05:04:43 PM EST

Let's just say this - (ben_tilly) - (5) - March 24, 2004, 05:22:10 PM EST

You may be right - (orion) - (4) - March 24, 2004, 07:54:06 PM EST

Not odd at all - (ben_tilly) - (3) - March 24, 2004, 09:32:51 PM EST

I may have had them at one time or thought I did - (orion) - (2) - March 24, 2004, 11:48:33 PM EST

Your confidence level is your problem. - (ben_tilly) - (1) - March 25, 2004, 02:34:24 PM EST

Not my only problem - (orion) - March 25, 2004, 06:46:49 PM EST

Do you know how to obtain your SSH key? - (pwhysall) - (1) - March 24, 2004, 11:51:29 AM EST

Yes I do - (orion) - March 24, 2004, 05:01:27 PM EST

I don't want to be a meanie, Norm, but... - (pwhysall) - (21) - March 24, 2004, 12:03:17 PM EST

Re: I don't want to be a meanie, Norm, but... - (deSitter) - (2) - March 24, 2004, 12:08:10 PM EST

Uh, riiiiight. - (Yendor) - (1) - March 24, 2004, 12:22:07 PM EST

Re: Uh, riiiiight. - (deSitter) - March 24, 2004, 12:28:24 PM EST

Oh but you are a meanie, nothing you can do about it. - (orion) - (17) - March 24, 2004, 05:21:52 PM EST

You've googled. - (pwhysall) - (16) - March 24, 2004, 05:48:12 PM EST

tad obvious I would say :-) -NT - (boxley) - (1) - March 24, 2004, 06:04:30 PM EST

To a genuine UNIX admin, yes. - (pwhysall) - March 24, 2004, 06:07:38 PM EST

So you say - (orion) - (13) - March 24, 2004, 07:57:58 PM EST

In that, you're almost definitely wrong - (ben_tilly) - (6) - March 24, 2004, 09:26:27 PM EST

actually you can do both - (boxley) - (3) - March 24, 2004, 09:30:18 PM EST

I was wondering about that... - (ben_tilly) - (1) - March 24, 2004, 09:36:54 PM EST

I should have been more specific. - (pwhysall) - March 25, 2004, 01:57:09 AM EST

PAM does that too, IIRC - (admin) - March 24, 2004, 10:50:56 PM EST

That is the way I do things - (orion) - March 24, 2004, 11:55:04 PM EST

There are ways to actually have both. - (folkert) - March 25, 2004, 08:22:18 PM EST

Norm there was enough misinformation in yer post - (boxley) - (5) - March 24, 2004, 09:26:54 PM EST

There is always Misinformation in my posts - (orion) - (4) - March 24, 2004, 11:56:37 PM EST

You claim you didnt lookup the answers - (boxley) - (3) - March 25, 2004, 08:23:11 AM EST

Fine if it shuts you up - (orion) - (2) - March 25, 2004, 06:43:29 PM EST

Actually you are correct. - (folkert) - (1) - March 25, 2004, 08:30:20 PM EST

I did fix my Linux problems on my own - (orion) - April 4, 2004, 12:24:51 PM EDT

Can you point to more such things? - (deSitter) - (32) - March 24, 2004, 05:53:25 PM EST

Your public key? - (pwhysall) - (11) - March 24, 2004, 06:00:22 PM EST

Re: Your public key? - (deSitter) - (10) - March 24, 2004, 06:11:23 PM EST

You probably sent your GPG key, right? - (pwhysall) - (9) - March 24, 2004, 06:12:18 PM EST

(bangs head onto bed spikes) - (deSitter) - (8) - March 24, 2004, 06:14:58 PM EST

Patience, grasshopper. -NT - (pwhysall) - (6) - March 24, 2004, 06:17:03 PM EST

Re: Patience, grasshopper. - (deSitter) - (5) - March 24, 2004, 06:27:56 PM EST

I got the impression - (altmann) - (4) - March 24, 2004, 06:33:08 PM EST

Hmm possible - (deSitter) - (3) - March 24, 2004, 06:43:22 PM EST

So try logging in. -NT - (admin) - (2) - March 24, 2004, 07:01:34 PM EST

to what? -NT - (deSitter) - (1) - March 24, 2004, 07:35:04 PM EST

To their server - (orion) - March 24, 2004, 07:56:28 PM EST

That isn't how ssh works - (ben_tilly) - March 24, 2004, 09:12:07 PM EST

Response finally showed up - (deSitter) - (17) - March 24, 2004, 08:43:22 PM EST

Re: Response finally showed up - (deSitter) - (1) - March 24, 2004, 08:45:53 PM EST

Luck Bro -NT - (boxley) - March 24, 2004, 09:31:55 PM EST

Stage 2 complete - (deSitter) - (13) - March 24, 2004, 10:27:32 PM EST

See the default Apache page here. Keep at it! :-) -NT - (Another Scott) - (12) - March 24, 2004, 10:34:31 PM EST

FreeBSD must be great - (deSitter) - (11) - March 24, 2004, 10:47:32 PM EST

Still the default page from here. - (broomberg) - (10) - March 25, 2004, 07:03:02 AM EST

cp index.html.en test1.html - (deSitter) - (9) - March 25, 2004, 08:53:40 AM EST

Don't assume - (broomberg) - (5) - March 25, 2004, 07:12:58 PM EST

? - (deSitter) - (4) - March 25, 2004, 07:40:39 PM EST

How hard to understand is that? - (broomberg) - March 25, 2004, 10:13:47 PM EST

test inside the test - (cforde) - (2) - March 26, 2004, 02:49:16 AM EST

I thought of it exactly opposite - (deSitter) - (1) - March 26, 2004, 04:16:04 AM EST

If they continue not contacting you, then at least try it. -NT - (ben_tilly) - March 26, 2004, 02:57:53 PM EST

Don't assume - (broomberg) - (2) - March 25, 2004, 07:13:18 PM EST

seconded -NT - (boxley) - March 25, 2004, 07:57:28 PM EST

Thirded. -NT - (mmoffitt) - March 26, 2004, 11:55:07 AM EST

have fun with that. knock'em dead -NT - (cforde) - March 25, 2004, 12:50:24 PM EST

That one was pretty random, sorry -NT - (ben_tilly) - (1) - March 24, 2004, 09:13:45 PM EST

S'OK send more if you find'em - (deSitter) - March 24, 2004, 09:32:03 PM EST

iwethey.org

Note: this is not exactly the safest place for your hand.
185 ms