IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Theory and Practice of Programming Forum / One reason I like Spring Framework
Post #143,448
by admin
Picture of admin
2/26/04 10:43:49 AM
Reply
New One reason I like Spring Framework
They're all about unchecked exceptions, and they've written a good amount of code to make things like JDBC behave in an unchecked manner.
Regards,

-scott anderson

"Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Post #143,524
by bluke
2/26/04 3:55:45 PM
Reply
New Absolutely
We have reams of code which catches a lower level exception and wraps it in a higher level one. Basically every level wraps the exceptions below it. For example our database layer (in theory, unfortunately many of the methods just throw 10 exceptions (SQLException, NameNotFoundException etc.) so you have application code having to catch SQLExceptions, EJBExceptions etc) catches all Exceptions and wraps them in some general exception. The layer above that does the saem and so on.
     Exception Handling Policy - (JimWeirich) - (48) - Feb. 26, 2004, 12:20:25 AM EST
         Possibly it depends on what level of code you are writing... - (Simon_Jester) - (38) - Feb. 26, 2004, 08:20:05 AM EST
             Ditto. - (admin) - (37) - Feb. 26, 2004, 09:24:37 AM EST
                 Because checked exceptions are STOOPID! - (tuberculosis) - (35) - Feb. 26, 2004, 10:23:11 AM EST
                     One reason I like Spring Framework - (admin) - (1) - Feb. 26, 2004, 10:43:49 AM EST
                         Absolutely - (bluke) - Feb. 26, 2004, 03:55:45 PM EST
                     Re: Because checked exceptions are STOOPID! - (dshellman) - (23) - Feb. 27, 2004, 04:20:44 PM EST
                         One respectable reason - (admin) - (13) - Feb. 27, 2004, 04:36:46 PM EST
                             Re: One respectable reason - (dshellman) - (12) - Feb. 27, 2004, 05:09:53 PM EST
                                 The problem with Java model is that I cannot - (Arkadiy) - (1) - Feb. 27, 2004, 05:30:34 PM EST
                                     Re: The problem with Java model is that I cannot - (dshellman) - Feb. 27, 2004, 05:37:26 PM EST
                                 But that would (i.e, *does*) defeat the whole purpose! - (CRConrad) - (3) - Feb. 27, 2004, 07:01:59 PM EST
                                     ICLRPD (new thread) - (drewk) - Feb. 29, 2004, 12:25:47 AM EST
                                     Re: But that would (i.e, *does*) defeat the whole purpose! - (dshellman) - (1) - March 1, 2004, 07:37:54 AM EST
                                         Sorry, either I don't get your meaning, or you didn't mine. - (CRConrad) - March 1, 2004, 09:10:07 AM EST
                                 What ends up happening ... - (bluke) - (5) - Feb. 29, 2004, 01:33:07 AM EST
                                     Re: What ends up happening ... - (dshellman) - (4) - March 1, 2004, 07:38:49 AM EST
                                         Re: What ends up happening ... - (tuberculosis) - March 1, 2004, 12:18:27 PM EST
                                         You didn't answer the question ... - (bluke) - (2) - March 1, 2004, 03:02:14 PM EST
                                             Re: You didn't answer the question ... - (dshellman) - (1) - March 2, 2004, 09:13:43 AM EST
                                                 A number of comments - (bluke) - March 3, 2004, 05:05:16 AM EST
                         We already discussed this - (ben_tilly) - (8) - Feb. 27, 2004, 06:38:32 PM EST
                             Re: We already discussed this - (dshellman) - (7) - March 1, 2004, 07:25:21 AM EST
                                 Blame the tool - (tuberculosis) - March 1, 2004, 12:27:25 PM EST
                                 You're right, that is unfortunate - (ben_tilly) - (5) - March 1, 2004, 02:46:24 PM EST
                                     Re: You're right, that is unfortunate - (dshellman) - (4) - March 2, 2004, 09:23:49 AM EST
                                         You have to balance benefit/cost - (ben_tilly) - (3) - March 3, 2004, 11:28:42 AM EST
                                             s/Knuth/Dijkstra/ - (a6l6e6x) - (2) - March 3, 2004, 10:45:32 PM EST
                                                 I had it right the first time - (ben_tilly) - (1) - March 3, 2004, 10:49:38 PM EST
                                                     I stand corrected then. - (a6l6e6x) - March 3, 2004, 11:06:24 PM EST
                     Re: Because checked exceptions are STOOPID! - (dshellman) - (8) - March 1, 2004, 01:07:30 PM EST
                         Hmm... - (CRConrad) - March 1, 2004, 04:30:13 PM EST
                         One phrase says it all. - (Arkadiy) - (6) - March 1, 2004, 04:44:39 PM EST
                             Caught my eye too - (tuberculosis) - March 1, 2004, 07:07:04 PM EST
                             Re: One phrase says it all. - (dshellman) - (4) - March 2, 2004, 09:04:06 AM EST
                                 I remain unconvinced - (tuberculosis) - March 2, 2004, 09:47:13 AM EST
                                 A Further Question on the Code Example - (JimWeirich) - (1) - March 2, 2004, 01:20:53 PM EST
                                     Re: A Further Question on the Code Example - (dshellman) - March 2, 2004, 02:59:24 PM EST
                                 Bad for class libraries? - (Arkadiy) - March 3, 2004, 07:44:09 AM EST
                 Re: Ditto. - (JimWeirich) - Feb. 26, 2004, 05:17:05 PM EST
         I meant Exception the class - (bluke) - (7) - Feb. 26, 2004, 03:51:29 PM EST
             Don't catch null pointer exceptions? - (JimWeirich) - (6) - Feb. 26, 2004, 05:14:57 PM EST
                 In development yes - (bluke) - (5) - Feb. 27, 2004, 01:02:37 AM EST
                     Re: In development yes - (JimWeirich) - (4) - Feb. 27, 2004, 12:35:18 PM EST
                         Agreed - (bluke) - (3) - Feb. 29, 2004, 01:25:04 AM EST
                             So wouldn't the remedy be... - (CRConrad) - (2) - Feb. 29, 2004, 04:03:57 PM EST
                                 cf. Spring Framework :-) -NT - (admin) - Feb. 29, 2004, 04:51:06 PM EST
                                 I agree ... - (bluke) - March 1, 2004, 05:36:33 AM EST
         Another reason to catch specifics - (jb4) - Feb. 27, 2004, 05:49:20 PM EST

I'm sure everyone who made this game is dead by now.
78 ms