IWETHEY v. 0.3.0
|
TODO
1,095 registered users | 0
active users
| 0 LpH |
Statistics
Login
|
Create New User
Welcome to IWETHEY!
IWETHEY Home
/
IWETHEY Board
/
Theory and Practice of Programming Forum
/
You got it
Post #143,004
by
bluke
2/24/04 11:24:06 AM
Reply
You got it
not only that but they are all similar e.g numA, numB etc. It is very easy mix them up and not even notice.
Constructor with 29 parameters
- (
bluke
)
- (20)
- Feb. 24, 2004, 09:08:55 AM EST
**boggle**
- (
deSitter
)
- Feb. 24, 2004, 09:10:52 AM EST
Depending on the language...
- (
admin
)
- (12)
- Feb. 24, 2004, 09:40:30 AM EST
LRPD
- (
deSitter
)
- Feb. 24, 2004, 09:44:12 AM EST
This is written in Java
- (
bluke
)
- (5)
- Feb. 24, 2004, 09:57:33 AM EST
Nasty.
-NT
- (
admin
)
- Feb. 24, 2004, 10:13:40 AM EST
Brings back bad memories
- (
deSitter
)
- (1)
- Feb. 24, 2004, 10:44:47 AM EST
Interesting point
- (
bluke
)
- Feb. 24, 2004, 02:53:01 PM EST
Re: Is written in Java?
- (
dlevitt
)
- (1)
- Feb. 24, 2004, 04:48:46 PM EST
Yes, by people with C/C++ (MFC) experience
-NT
- (
bluke
)
- Feb. 25, 2004, 02:42:31 AM EST
Two points
- (
Simon_Jester
)
- (4)
- Feb. 24, 2004, 11:48:24 PM EST
Re: Two points - well, you're half right.
- (
admin
)
- (3)
- Feb. 25, 2004, 08:41:28 AM EST
"Static factory methods", constructors - what's the diff? (new thread)
- (
CRConrad
)
- Feb. 25, 2004, 10:23:58 AM EST
You're right...
- (
Simon_Jester
)
- (1)
- Feb. 25, 2004, 07:54:45 PM EST
Not required in Java.
- (
admin
)
- Feb. 26, 2004, 12:09:33 AM EST
29 parameters, all positional?
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (1)
- Feb. 24, 2004, 10:59:26 AM EST
You got it
- (
bluke
)
- Feb. 24, 2004, 11:24:06 AM EST
Kill the author
- (
tuberculosis
)
- (1)
- Feb. 24, 2004, 02:26:27 PM EST
No one there would understand
- (
bluke
)
- Feb. 24, 2004, 02:53:53 PM EST
A dictionary array is nice for such
-NT
- (
tablizer
)
- Feb. 25, 2004, 12:00:23 AM EST
Try partial application wrappers?
-NT
- (
FuManChu
)
- Feb. 25, 2004, 03:57:45 AM EST
i
we
they
.org
CCTBRRDS!
46 ms