IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New 29 parameters, all positional?
Scott tells me that you can't do named parameters in Java. Which lets me understand how you could get into such a mess.

I'm glad that I don't have to work with it though.

Cheers,
Ben
"good ideas and bad code build communities, the other three combinations do not"
- [link|http://archives.real-time.com/pipermail/cocoon-devel/2000-October/003023.html|Stefano Mazzocchi]
New You got it
not only that but they are all similar e.g numA, numB etc. It is very easy mix them up and not even notice.
     Constructor with 29 parameters - (bluke) - (20)
         **boggle** - (deSitter)
         Depending on the language... - (admin) - (12)
             LRPD - (deSitter)
             This is written in Java - (bluke) - (5)
                 Nasty. -NT - (admin)
                 Brings back bad memories - (deSitter) - (1)
                     Interesting point - (bluke)
                 Re: Is written in Java? - (dlevitt) - (1)
                     Yes, by people with C/C++ (MFC) experience -NT - (bluke)
             Two points - (Simon_Jester) - (4)
                 Re: Two points - well, you're half right. - (admin) - (3)
                     "Static factory methods", constructors - what's the diff? (new thread) - (CRConrad)
                     You're right... - (Simon_Jester) - (1)
                         Not required in Java. - (admin)
         29 parameters, all positional? - (ben_tilly) - (1)
             You got it - (bluke)
         Kill the author - (tuberculosis) - (1)
             No one there would understand - (bluke)
         A dictionary array is nice for such -NT - (tablizer)
         Try partial application wrappers? -NT - (FuManChu)

Wait 'til you sneeze, next.
67 ms