Constructor with 29 parameters - (bluke) - (20) - Feb. 24, 2004, 09:08:55 AM EST
         **boggle** - (deSitter) - Feb. 24, 2004, 09:10:52 AM EST
         Depending on the language... - (admin) - (12) - Feb. 24, 2004, 09:40:30 AM EST
             LRPD - (deSitter) - Feb. 24, 2004, 09:44:12 AM EST
             This is written in Java - (bluke) - (5) - Feb. 24, 2004, 09:57:33 AM EST
                 Nasty. -NT - (admin) - Feb. 24, 2004, 10:13:40 AM EST
                 Brings back bad memories - (deSitter) - (1) - Feb. 24, 2004, 10:44:47 AM EST
                     Interesting point - (bluke) - Feb. 24, 2004, 02:53:01 PM EST
                 Re: Is written in Java? - (dlevitt) - (1) - Feb. 24, 2004, 04:48:46 PM EST
                     Yes, by people with C/C++ (MFC) experience -NT - (bluke) - Feb. 25, 2004, 02:42:31 AM EST
             Two points - (Simon_Jester) - (4) - Feb. 24, 2004, 11:48:24 PM EST
                 Re: Two points - well, you're half right. - (admin) - (3) - Feb. 25, 2004, 08:41:28 AM EST
                     "Static factory methods", constructors - what's the diff? (new thread) - (CRConrad) - Feb. 25, 2004, 10:23:58 AM EST
                     You're right... - (Simon_Jester) - (1) - Feb. 25, 2004, 07:54:45 PM EST
                         Not required in Java. - (admin) - Feb. 26, 2004, 12:09:33 AM EST
         29 parameters, all positional? - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Feb. 24, 2004, 10:59:26 AM EST
             You got it - (bluke) - Feb. 24, 2004, 11:24:06 AM EST
         Kill the author - (tuberculosis) - (1) - Feb. 24, 2004, 02:26:27 PM EST
             No one there would understand - (bluke) - Feb. 24, 2004, 02:53:53 PM EST
         A dictionary array is nice for such -NT - (tablizer) - Feb. 25, 2004, 12:00:23 AM EST
         Try partial application wrappers? -NT - (FuManChu) - Feb. 25, 2004, 03:57:45 AM EST