Should we redevelop nuclear power? - (deSitter) - (35) - Jan. 25, 2004, 09:51:01 PM EST
         Depends. - (Another Scott) - Jan. 25, 2004, 10:28:33 PM EST
         'Too cheap to meter' . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (6) - Jan. 25, 2004, 10:59:48 PM EST
             Alternative sources of energy - (orion) - (3) - Jan. 25, 2004, 11:07:52 PM EST
                 Landfills - (Andrew Grygus) - (2) - Jan. 25, 2004, 11:14:05 PM EST
                     Problem with landfills - (orion) - (1) - Jan. 25, 2004, 11:40:10 PM EST
                         I'm not saying use it for fuel . . - (Andrew Grygus) - Jan. 25, 2004, 11:52:38 PM EST
             Re: 'Too cheap to meter' . . . - (deSitter) - (1) - Jan. 25, 2004, 11:21:00 PM EST
                 Problems of scale. - (Andrew Grygus) - Jan. 25, 2004, 11:26:19 PM EST
         strontium ninety reactors - (boxley) - Jan. 25, 2004, 11:06:43 PM EST
         Some pro-nuke information - (deSitter) - Jan. 25, 2004, 11:44:07 PM EST
         Re: Should we redevelop nuclear power? NO - (Ashton) - (10) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:22:16 AM EST
             Biggest reason for a resounding No Way in Hell! - (Silverlock) - (6) - Jan. 26, 2004, 07:49:09 AM EST
                 Re: Biggest reason for a resounding No Way in Hell! - (deSitter) - (5) - Jan. 26, 2004, 07:59:10 AM EST
                     Strange - (Silverlock) - (4) - Jan. 26, 2004, 08:17:59 AM EST
                         There are really no alternatives - (deSitter) - (3) - Jan. 26, 2004, 08:31:38 AM EST
                             There will be foxhole conversions... - (inthane-chan) - Jan. 26, 2004, 10:55:52 AM EST
                             You're not looking - (tuberculosis) - Aug. 21, 2007, 12:41:20 PM EDT
                             Re: There are really no alternatives - in haste - (Ashton) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:35:17 PM EST
             Remember this, you can never put too much water in a nuclear - (orion) - Jan. 26, 2004, 11:05:44 AM EST
             Little comparison - (Arkadiy) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 02:48:22 PM EST
                 Point >|< missed - (Ashton) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:28:29 PM EST
         'potentially unacceptable consequences' - (Andrew Grygus) - (12) - Jan. 26, 2004, 02:13:36 PM EST
             ROFL - (deSitter) - (11) - Jan. 26, 2004, 02:28:34 PM EST
                 And in other historic proud moments... - (deSitter) - (2) - Jan. 26, 2004, 02:55:09 PM EST
                     Speaking of bombing SC: remember "Special Bulletin"? - (Another Scott) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:41:46 PM EST
                         And on that serious note - (deSitter) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:44:13 PM EST
                 Commercial reactors would be much safer . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (7) - Jan. 26, 2004, 02:45:03 PM EST
                     ROFL! - (deSitter) - Jan. 26, 2004, 02:54:35 PM EST
                     Remember flic re nuke sub, ship in 'conflict'? - (Ashton) - (5) - Jan. 27, 2004, 03:51:19 AM EST
                         The Bedford Incident - (altmann) - Jan. 27, 2004, 04:01:09 AM EST
                         Hunt For Red October, IIRC. -NT - (pwhysall) - (3) - Jan. 27, 2004, 07:28:01 AM EST
                             Nope. - (inthane-chan) - (2) - Jan. 27, 2004, 11:00:55 AM EST
                                 Definitely "The Bedford Incident" - (rcareaga) - (1) - Jan. 27, 2004, 04:26:32 PM EST
                                     Ah.. "The Bells of St. Mary's" - (Ashton) - Jan. 27, 2004, 08:52:42 PM EST
         "Is there any hope for nuclear power?" - (jb4) - Jan. 27, 2004, 06:47:20 PM EST