multithreaded Perl? - (slugbug) - (36) - Oct. 29, 2003, 09:51:00 AM EST
         What the?? - (deSitter) - (14) - Oct. 29, 2003, 10:12:22 AM EST
             multi-instance... - (slugbug) - (8) - Oct. 29, 2003, 10:34:11 AM EST
                 If this is a Unixy system, definitely go with fork() - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Oct. 29, 2003, 10:43:47 AM EST
                     Yes... - (slugbug) - Oct. 29, 2003, 11:33:16 AM EST
                 Re: multi-instance... - (deSitter) - (5) - Oct. 29, 2003, 11:00:52 AM EST
                     Er... - (admin) - (1) - Oct. 29, 2003, 11:07:31 AM EST
                         DAMMIT! I WANT TOYS! -NT - (deSitter) - Oct. 29, 2003, 11:14:20 AM EST
                     toys, toys, toys... - (slugbug) - (2) - Oct. 29, 2003, 11:20:40 AM EST
                         Re: toys, toys, toys... - (deSitter) - Oct. 29, 2003, 11:25:50 AM EST
                         Re: toys, toys, toys... (new thread) - (admin) - Oct. 29, 2003, 11:34:11 AM EST
             Re: What the?? - (jb4) - (4) - Oct. 29, 2003, 01:59:53 PM EST
                 That's 4GB of angle brackets alone! -NT - (deSitter) - (2) - Oct. 29, 2003, 02:06:11 PM EST
                     Don't laugh... - (admin) - Oct. 29, 2003, 02:34:36 PM EST
                     Yes, the developers of LISP would be proud... -NT - (jb4) - Oct. 29, 2003, 05:11:53 PM EST
                 nope.... - (slugbug) - Oct. 29, 2003, 02:38:09 PM EST
         Possible, but I wouldn't - (ben_tilly) - (15) - Oct. 29, 2003, 10:36:24 AM EST
             Ben, thank you.... - (slugbug) - (14) - Oct. 29, 2003, 11:22:48 AM EST
                 No problem - (ben_tilly) - (13) - Oct. 29, 2003, 02:27:10 PM EST
                     Re: No problem - (deSitter) - (2) - Oct. 29, 2003, 02:42:45 PM EST
                         The more you can do, the more they ask you to do - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Oct. 29, 2003, 05:13:13 PM EST
                             Absolutely. - (admin) - Oct. 29, 2003, 05:19:55 PM EST
                     this is an... - (slugbug) - Oct. 29, 2003, 02:43:11 PM EST
                     So, Perl assumes POSIX compliance in the OS, eh? - (jb4) - (6) - Oct. 29, 2003, 05:13:48 PM EST
                         No - (ben_tilly) - (5) - Oct. 29, 2003, 05:53:22 PM EST
                             Interesting, but looks like a bit of a kluge - (jb4) - (4) - Oct. 30, 2003, 02:06:32 PM EST
                                 It is a kludge - (ben_tilly) - (3) - Oct. 30, 2003, 02:48:22 PM EST
                                     Re: It is a kludge - (deSitter) - (2) - Oct. 30, 2003, 02:50:47 PM EST
                                         One of those things was Perl ;-) -NT - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Oct. 30, 2003, 04:22:25 PM EST
                                             Don't I know! - (deSitter) - Oct. 30, 2003, 04:36:04 PM EST
                     Query: I've played a (small) amount with the multithreading - (Simon_Jester) - (1) - Oct. 30, 2003, 02:06:03 PM EST
                         That scheduler optimization is pretty recent IIRC -NT - (ben_tilly) - Oct. 30, 2003, 02:39:39 PM EST
         More info please - (broomberg) - (4) - Oct. 30, 2003, 06:24:47 PM EST
             Geez. 1 day late and nothin! -NT - (broomberg) - Nov. 1, 2003, 09:06:49 AM EST
             1 day late and.... - (slugbug) - (2) - Nov. 2, 2003, 11:25:47 AM EST
                 IFS? - (broomberg) - (1) - Nov. 2, 2003, 02:08:35 PM EST
                     Re: IFS? - (slugbug) - Nov. 2, 2003, 06:05:46 PM EST