Re: multi-instance...

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #123,238 by deSitter 10/29/03 11:00:52 AM Reply	Re: multi-instance... !!! What are you working on, the Forbin project?? 14 processors! Holy Cran! Must be an E10000 with a lot of cooling fans! -drl
Post #123,240 by admin 10/29/03 11:07:31 AM Reply	Er... We've got a 6000 with 24 processors here, IIRC... :-) Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Post #123,242 by deSitter 10/29/03 11:14:20 AM Reply	DAMMIT! I WANT TOYS! -drl
Post #123,243 by slugbug 10/29/03 11:20:40 AM Reply	toys, toys, toys... ...we have 60+ systems and most of these are 10-36 processor range with tons of disk and memory. Fun to partition some of these and run Linux (except for upgrade issues); these boxes can run multiple OSes concurrently and can shift memory, processor, and disk based on scheduled settings. By early next year, these same boxes will be able to shift memory, processor, and disk dynamically based on workload at any given time. Reminds me.....its about time to get some more personal toys for my lab :-) -Slugbug
Post #123,245 by deSitter 10/29/03 11:25:50 AM Reply	Re: toys, toys, toys... Need any help? Have truck and bike will travel :) -drl
Post #123,250 by admin 10/29/03 11:34:11 AM Reply	Re: toys, toys, toys... (new thread) Created as new thread #123249 titled [link\|/forums/render/content/show?contentid=123249\|Re: toys, toys, toys...] Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."

multithreaded Perl? - (slugbug) - (36) - Oct. 29, 2003, 09:51:00 AM EST

What the?? - (deSitter) - (14) - Oct. 29, 2003, 10:12:22 AM EST

multi-instance... - (slugbug) - (8) - Oct. 29, 2003, 10:34:11 AM EST

If this is a Unixy system, definitely go with fork() - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Oct. 29, 2003, 10:43:47 AM EST

Yes... - (slugbug) - Oct. 29, 2003, 11:33:16 AM EST

Re: multi-instance... - (deSitter) - (5) - Oct. 29, 2003, 11:00:52 AM EST

Er... - (admin) - (1) - Oct. 29, 2003, 11:07:31 AM EST

DAMMIT! I WANT TOYS! -NT - (deSitter) - Oct. 29, 2003, 11:14:20 AM EST

toys, toys, toys... - (slugbug) - (2) - Oct. 29, 2003, 11:20:40 AM EST

Re: toys, toys, toys... - (deSitter) - Oct. 29, 2003, 11:25:50 AM EST

Re: toys, toys, toys... (new thread) - (admin) - Oct. 29, 2003, 11:34:11 AM EST

Re: What the?? - (jb4) - (4) - Oct. 29, 2003, 01:59:53 PM EST

That's 4GB of angle brackets alone! -NT - (deSitter) - (2) - Oct. 29, 2003, 02:06:11 PM EST

Don't laugh... - (admin) - Oct. 29, 2003, 02:34:36 PM EST

Yes, the developers of LISP would be proud... -NT - (jb4) - Oct. 29, 2003, 05:11:53 PM EST

nope.... - (slugbug) - Oct. 29, 2003, 02:38:09 PM EST

Possible, but I wouldn't - (ben_tilly) - (15) - Oct. 29, 2003, 10:36:24 AM EST

Ben, thank you.... - (slugbug) - (14) - Oct. 29, 2003, 11:22:48 AM EST

No problem - (ben_tilly) - (13) - Oct. 29, 2003, 02:27:10 PM EST

Re: No problem - (deSitter) - (2) - Oct. 29, 2003, 02:42:45 PM EST

The more you can do, the more they ask you to do - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Oct. 29, 2003, 05:13:13 PM EST

Absolutely. - (admin) - Oct. 29, 2003, 05:19:55 PM EST

this is an... - (slugbug) - Oct. 29, 2003, 02:43:11 PM EST

So, Perl assumes POSIX compliance in the OS, eh? - (jb4) - (6) - Oct. 29, 2003, 05:13:48 PM EST

No - (ben_tilly) - (5) - Oct. 29, 2003, 05:53:22 PM EST

Interesting, but looks like a bit of a kluge - (jb4) - (4) - Oct. 30, 2003, 02:06:32 PM EST

It is a kludge - (ben_tilly) - (3) - Oct. 30, 2003, 02:48:22 PM EST

Re: It is a kludge - (deSitter) - (2) - Oct. 30, 2003, 02:50:47 PM EST

One of those things was Perl ;-) -NT - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Oct. 30, 2003, 04:22:25 PM EST

Don't I know! - (deSitter) - Oct. 30, 2003, 04:36:04 PM EST

Query: I've played a (small) amount with the multithreading - (Simon_Jester) - (1) - Oct. 30, 2003, 02:06:03 PM EST

That scheduler optimization is pretty recent IIRC -NT - (ben_tilly) - Oct. 30, 2003, 02:39:39 PM EST

More info please - (broomberg) - (4) - Oct. 30, 2003, 06:24:47 PM EST

Geez. 1 day late and nothin! -NT - (broomberg) - Nov. 1, 2003, 09:06:49 AM EST

1 day late and.... - (slugbug) - (2) - Nov. 2, 2003, 11:25:47 AM EST

IFS? - (broomberg) - (1) - Nov. 2, 2003, 02:08:35 PM EST

Re: IFS? - (slugbug) - Nov. 2, 2003, 06:05:46 PM EST

Powered by a Shining Ingot of Ineptium!
61 ms