Communication between two servers. - (admin) - (39) - Oct. 20, 2003, 09:23:06 AM EDT
         SOAP - (ChrisR) - (8) - Oct. 20, 2003, 10:39:16 AM EDT
             Right, that's what I'm trying to avoid. - (admin) - (1) - Oct. 20, 2003, 10:44:22 AM EDT
                 Welcome to my life -NT - (drewk) - Oct. 20, 2003, 10:47:47 AM EDT
             Stupid Object Asskiss Protocol -NT - (tuberculosis) - (5) - Oct. 20, 2003, 02:13:48 PM EDT
                 SOAP is one those decent ideas... - (ChrisR) - (4) - Oct. 20, 2003, 04:13:34 PM EDT
                     A decent idea? - (ben_tilly) - (2) - Oct. 20, 2003, 04:49:41 PM EDT
                         Valid complaint - (ChrisR) - Oct. 20, 2003, 05:09:00 PM EDT
                         In fairness, - (Arkadiy) - Oct. 20, 2003, 07:00:33 PM EDT
                     No, she's a dog - (tuberculosis) - Oct. 20, 2003, 06:52:00 PM EDT
         Quick alphabet soup translation: - (jb4) - (2) - Oct. 20, 2003, 10:49:48 AM EDT
             Java Messaging Service - (admin) - (1) - Oct. 20, 2003, 10:51:21 AM EDT
                 Danke -NT - (jb4) - Oct. 20, 2003, 12:00:07 PM EDT
         roll own xinted service? - (deSitter) - Oct. 20, 2003, 10:58:24 AM EDT
         Just remember--anything manual can be automated - (FuManChu) - (5) - Oct. 20, 2003, 11:05:20 AM EDT
             Well, that's what I meant. - (admin) - Oct. 20, 2003, 11:09:08 AM EDT
             I lean towards sockets as well - (tjsinclair) - (3) - Oct. 20, 2003, 12:00:35 PM EDT
                 Remember there's C++ on the other end. - (admin) - (2) - Oct. 20, 2003, 12:05:20 PM EDT
                     Name one: - (folkert) - (1) - Oct. 20, 2003, 01:21:06 PM EDT
                         I'm guessing the answer will be: - (admin) - Oct. 20, 2003, 02:06:56 PM EDT
         4. CORBA connection but same objection as JMS Go with socket -NT - (boxley) - Oct. 20, 2003, 11:43:09 AM EDT
         My Gut reaction tells me: - (folkert) - (9) - Oct. 20, 2003, 12:01:46 PM EDT
             We have plenty of socket servers here already. - (admin) - (8) - Oct. 20, 2003, 12:06:09 PM EDT
                 Sockets can stream, http does not, its connectionless - (boxley) - (1) - Oct. 20, 2003, 12:24:11 PM EDT
                     HTTP 1.1 supports pipelining, FYI. -NT - (admin) - Oct. 20, 2003, 12:46:07 PM EDT
                 YALOP - (folkert) - (1) - Oct. 20, 2003, 01:12:26 PM EDT
                     Agreed - (deSitter) - Oct. 20, 2003, 01:19:38 PM EDT
                 Why not HTTP? - (tablizer) - (3) - Oct. 24, 2003, 11:06:10 PM EDT
                     Read the problem description. - (admin) - (2) - Oct. 25, 2003, 12:19:08 AM EDT
                         You didn't qualify "too much overhead" - (tablizer) - (1) - Oct. 25, 2003, 05:13:44 PM EDT
                             Packet overhead doesn't matter. - (admin) - Oct. 25, 2003, 07:36:35 PM EDT
         DECNet Mailboxes. - (pwhysall) - (2) - Oct. 20, 2003, 01:12:30 PM EDT
             AHHH! NO!!! - (deSitter) - (1) - Oct. 20, 2003, 01:16:29 PM EDT
                 Silence, heretic. - (pwhysall) - Oct. 20, 2003, 01:23:32 PM EDT
         Socket to me - (tuberculosis) - (4) - Oct. 20, 2003, 02:25:08 PM EDT
             Why the daemon: - (admin) - (3) - Oct. 20, 2003, 02:56:20 PM EDT
                 Not an answer then, but a plan of attack :) - (FuManChu) - (2) - Oct. 20, 2003, 05:03:37 PM EDT
                     Complicated political situation. - (admin) - (1) - Oct. 20, 2003, 05:05:20 PM EDT
                         You mean you're not king? - (tuberculosis) - Oct. 20, 2003, 06:56:01 PM EDT
         Tuxedo/Java Jolt? - (gdaustin) - Oct. 20, 2003, 03:11:19 PM EDT