Thanks.
Oh, I just checked the new version - it's there, not sure what's up with that...
Updated resume. Please critique.
- (inthane-chan)
- (24)
- Aug. 31, 2003, 10:58:47 PM EDT
Bullet the blue skies
- (deSitter)
- (8)
- Aug. 31, 2003, 11:13:46 PM EDT
Interesting.
- (inthane-chan)
- (7)
- Aug. 31, 2003, 11:15:31 PM EDT
Figures :)
- (deSitter)
- (5)
- Aug. 31, 2003, 11:20:12 PM EDT
Hey, my dad's been wrong before...
- (inthane-chan)
- (4)
- Aug. 31, 2003, 11:44:35 PM EDT
Since it's HTML
- (deSitter)
- (3)
- Aug. 31, 2003, 11:52:59 PM EDT
All text.
- (inthane-chan)
- (2)
- Aug. 31, 2003, 11:55:36 PM EDT
My solution to that is...
- (kmself)
- (1)
- Sept. 1, 2003, 03:44:20 AM EDT
Well, yeah, that's the sensible solution...
- (inthane-chan)
- Sept. 1, 2003, 09:51:26 AM EDT
You know the audience...
- (gdaustin)
- Sept. 1, 2003, 05:26:19 PM EDT
M$ specific quotes and apostrophes
- (broomberg)
- (3)
- Sept. 1, 2003, 10:02:04 AM EDT
Where?
- (inthane-chan)
- (2)
- Sept. 1, 2003, 10:07:53 AM EDT
No quotes, only apostrophes
- (broomberg)
- (1)
- Sept. 1, 2003, 10:23:28 AM EDT
Fixed.
- (inthane-chan)
- Sept. 1, 2003, 10:31:15 AM EDT
Critique
- (broomberg)
- (1)
- Sept. 1, 2003, 10:17:08 AM EDT
Great point.
- (inthane-chan)
- Sept. 1, 2003, 10:29:25 AM EDT
Final update made to resume.
- (inthane-chan)
- (6)
- Sept. 1, 2003, 11:28:35 AM EDT
Explain what you mean by the Novell VS AD statement
- (broomberg)
- (5)
- Sept. 1, 2003, 12:40:15 PM EDT
OK, just reread the job description
- (broomberg)
- (4)
- Sept. 1, 2003, 12:44:25 PM EDT
The reasoning behind my statement.
- (inthane-chan)
- (3)
- Sept. 1, 2003, 12:54:19 PM EDT
Makes sense
- (broomberg)
- Sept. 1, 2003, 12:58:27 PM EDT
Seems a really interesting dance
- (Ashton)
- (1)
- Sept. 1, 2003, 04:46:14 PM EDT
We do something like that
- (broomberg)
- Sept. 1, 2003, 06:30:14 PM EDT
Re: Updated resume. Please critique.
- (qstephens)
- (1)
- Sept. 6, 2003, 03:06:27 AM EDT
Normally that would be the case.
- (inthane-chan)
- Sept. 6, 2003, 06:56:35 PM EDT