Bryce gibbers away:

Good written communication of technical topics is a rare gift[1].

However rare or common it may be, you're not the person to judge on that, since you wouldn't recognize good writing if it fell out of a tree and bopped you on the head.

I have not seen any justifications for OO that I think are well written.

But since what you think is well written has nothing what-so-fucking-ever to do with what actually is well written, that doesn't mean they don't exist -- in fact, given the "powers" of judgment you've shown before, that's all the more reason to think they do exist.

CRC has made some great analogies for other topics, but not OO justification. Mastering OO seems to damage the articulation neurons it seems. Beyond the vague brochure talk, nothing concrete comes.

No, it's you who are too stupid to recognize what is "vague brochure talk" and what isn't.