Good written communication of technical topics is a rare gift[1]. I have not seen any justifications for OO that I think are well written. CRC has made some great analogies for other topics, but not OO justification. Mastering OO seems to damage the articulation neurons it seems. Beyond the vague brochure talk, nothing concrete comes.

As far as my writing, if you have a question about something I have written, feel free to ask. I usually won't cuss you out for asking if you have not flamed me for some other issue. Further, rotten spelling and extra parenthesis are usually not show stoppers. Show stoppers to me are things like long sentences and excess pronouns. Parenthesis can be ignored, but ambiguous pronouns will not magically be fixed by ignoring them. IOW, extra information is much less of a sin than insufficient or ambigious information. It is easier to chop an arm off than add one.

[1] It can also vary per person. A writing style that works for one may not work for others.