Huh?

Post #110,359 by johnu 7/18/03 1:00:31 PM Reply	Huh? Furthermore, given that is was more than 5 years between the end of the war and when inspectors left - and given that his WMD programs are SO hard to find now...you've now proven that the weapons inspectors were doing their jobs and were successful. Forcing the Iraqis to go to extremes to hide their WMD programs is considered success for you?
Post #110,361 by deSitter 7/18/03 1:12:41 PM Reply	Re: Huh? We have spy satellites. It's in the desert. If you move around in the desert, you make nice big clouds of dust. So, I suppose they did everything on windless nights, in total darkness. -drl
Post #110,365 by dmarker 7/18/03 1:30:53 PM Reply	Re: Huh? Do you have an opinion on Scott Ritter's expert opinions ? I am inclinded to think he had it spot on and yet today there are still people with no qualified expert opinion on the matter, who seem to want to tell us that Ritter's so far proven expert opinions were not as right as they have thus far been - ??? Cheers Doug
Post #110,695 by johnu 7/21/03 1:06:45 PM Reply	Re: Huh? I am inclinded to think he had it spot on and yet today there are still people with no qualified expert opinion on the matter, who seem to want to tell us that Ritter's so far proven expert opinions were not as right as they have thus far been - ??? Well, David Kay is a former weapons inspector and is in Iraq collecting evidence of WMDs. He believes, from the evidence he's seen, that Iraq had WMD programs (chemical, biological, nuclear and missle) and believes he will have enough documentation to prove it. I'll leave it to you to decide if he's qualified enough... Regards, John
Post #110,375 by Simon_Jester 7/18/03 2:28:43 PM Reply	Absolutely.... Forcing the Iraqis to go to extremes to hide their WMD programs is considered success for you? Would you claim that it's a failure? What would you define as a success for the WMD inspection teams then?
Post #110,381 by Arkadiy 7/18/03 3:26:01 PM Reply	Keeping Iraq out of WMD business for the cost of 0 lives and $0.010 billion a year (I am guessing here) is a failure. Keeping Iraq out of WMD business at the cost of $1B and 7 to 20 people a week is a success. Remind me nevr to trust you with my money, would you? -- Less Is More. In my book, About Face, I introduce over 50 powerful design axioms. This is one of them. --Alan Cooper. The Inmates Are Running the Asylum
Post #110,696 by johnu 7/21/03 1:11:02 PM Reply	Re: Keeping Iraq out of WMD business Keeping Iraq out of WMD business for the cost of 0 lives and $0.010 billion a year (I am guessing here) is a failure. The way I read this story is the WMD program continued, they just moved the evidence to private residences where inspectors would never go. Did I misunderstand David Kay? Regards, John
Post #110,698 by Arkadiy 7/21/03 1:25:59 PM Reply	The evidence was _hidden_ in private homes. The WMD program was mothballed where inspectors could not see it. But it was not "continuing" as in being advanced daily. At least that's my take of it. -- Less Is More. In my book, About Face, I introduce over 50 powerful design axioms. This is one of them. --Alan Cooper. The Inmates Are Running the Asylum
Post #110,724 by Simon_Jester 7/21/03 3:44:12 PM Reply	Give it up.....you can't win... the materials could be hidden in public home, buried beneath a small tree, filled with concrete and rusted beyond use and he would still claim that they had a WMD program ongoing and producing output. Reason has long since gone out the window. Relax. They're going to find a #5 nut that can be used on a #5 bolt that can be used an a centrifuge that can be used to refine uranium that can be used to make a bomb. See! WMD program PROOF!

Welcome to IWETHEY!