www.ultraedit.com

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #103,056 by Yendor 5/22/03 4:23:31 AM Reply	www.ultraedit.com It's the one thing about Winblows that I truly miss using Linux. Best money I ever spent on shareware. -YendorMike [link\|http://www.hope-ride.org/\|http://www.hope-ride.org/]
Post #103,086 by deSitter 5/22/03 10:23:31 AM Reply	Ultra-seconded It would probably run in a Wine session, since it doesn't install anything in winsys. I like the way it intelligently converts from DOS to UNIX format. -drl
Post #103,409 by tablizer 5/24/03 4:01:33 PM 5/24/03 4:02:18 PM Reply	Ultra-Edit appears not to have Turing-complete scripting It seems to have IF statements, but no loops, gotos, and/or functions BTW, thanks for the tips, guys. ________________ oop.ismad.com Edited by tablizer May 24, 2003, 04:02:18 PM EDT Expand All History
Post #103,462 by deSitter 5/25/03 2:42:07 AM Reply	Do tell. Is that as bad as not having a Euro symbol? -drl

Programmable Windows-friendly code editor? - (tablizer) - (27) - May 22, 2003, 03:20:59 AM EDT

www.eclipse.org - (pwhysall) - May 22, 2003, 03:25:07 AM EDT

www.ultraedit.com - (Yendor) - (3) - May 22, 2003, 04:23:31 AM EDT

Ultra-seconded - (deSitter) - (2) - May 22, 2003, 10:23:31 AM EDT

Ultra-Edit appears not to have Turing-complete scripting - (tablizer) - (1) - May 24, 2003, 04:02:18 PM EDT

Do tell. Is that as bad as not having a Euro symbol? -NT - (deSitter) - May 25, 2003, 02:42:07 AM EDT

Re: Programmable Windows-friendly code editor? - (systems) - (2) - May 22, 2003, 07:40:46 AM EDT

He did not say "cheap" either, so - (Arkadiy) - (1) - May 22, 2003, 10:13:52 AM EDT

Re: He did not say "cheap" either, so - (jb4) - May 22, 2003, 05:41:23 PM EDT

Dunno if it's "programmable", exactly... - (CRConrad) - May 22, 2003, 08:08:39 AM EDT

I use GWDSoft GTEdit - (folkert) - May 22, 2003, 08:34:53 AM EDT

Ultraedit or Notetab; as seen elsewhere in this thread - (bbronson) - May 22, 2003, 10:42:36 AM EDT

Turing Complete? - (broomberg) - (15) - May 25, 2003, 12:51:34 AM EDT

re: Turing-Complete - (tablizer) - (14) - May 25, 2003, 05:35:13 PM EDT

OK, slick has it - (broomberg) - (13) - May 26, 2003, 12:28:27 AM EDT

Ed is $170 versus Slick for $270 - (tablizer) - (12) - May 28, 2003, 03:10:03 PM EDT

eeeeemaaaaaaacssssssss! - (pwhysall) - May 28, 2003, 04:50:21 PM EDT

Emacs can do CUA. It takes 20 seconds to make it happen - (Arkadiy) - (10) - May 28, 2003, 06:03:23 PM EDT

CUA - (jake123) - May 28, 2003, 07:52:21 PM EDT

Emacsaphobia - (tablizer) - (8) - May 30, 2003, 06:23:17 PM EDT

Except that doesn't happen. - (admin) - (7) - May 30, 2003, 06:32:53 PM EDT

Maybe I am better at bumping the wrong button than you - (tablizer) - (5) - May 31, 2003, 01:09:22 AM EDT

What wrong button? - (pwhysall) - (4) - May 31, 2003, 01:46:13 AM EDT

It is a pulled-out-of-my-arse guess -NT - (tablizer) - (3) - May 31, 2003, 02:18:27 AM EDT

Fairy nuff. - (pwhysall) - (2) - May 31, 2003, 03:23:23 AM EDT

Dahm yew... - (folkert) - (1) - May 31, 2003, 09:30:08 AM EDT

Hay, I dig yorzez spailing -NT - (tablizer) - June 14, 2003, 03:03:10 PM EDT

Heh. - (pwhysall) - May 31, 2003, 01:45:51 AM EDT

Passengers should be scared and not heard.
57 ms