IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New And before Reagan there was Johnson and Abe Fortas
[link|http://wais.stanford.edu/us_supremecourtabefortas91002.html|Here].

Hank Greely explains the fate of Abe Fortas: "Fortas had been one of the key lawyers who preserved "Landslide Lyndon's" 87 vote victory in his 1948 race for the US Senate. Johnson used him as a trusted adviser thereafter, successfully nominating for a seat as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court in 1965. In June 1968 LBJ nominated the very liberal Fortas for promotion from Associate Justice to Chief Justice, to replace Earl Warren, who had announced that he was retiring effective on the confirmation of his successor. Republican Senators and Southern conservative Democratic Senators stalled the nomination, hoping (correctly, as it turned out) that a Republican would be elected and would nominate a conservative successor to Warren. A vote to break a four-day filibuster failed on October 2 and Fortas asked that his name be withdrawn. Johnson's nomination of Fortas was not helped by the fact that LBJ nominated a Texas crony, Homer Thorneberry, a non-spectacular lower court federal judge, to take Fortas's Associate Justice seat.


[link|http://216.239.35.100/search?q=cache:g9uJ-xs6dtEJ:www.nevergoback.org/filibuster.pdf&hl=en&ie=UTF-8|This page] says that about 20% of Supreme Court justices have been rejected, including 2 of Nixon's.

The tit for tat continues to this day.

Indeed. There are more news outlets, and more interest groups with a stake in the outcome, so the scrutiny of any new nominee is going to be increasingly intense.

Cheers,
Scott.
New Yep, but Abe Fortas was tainted more than most. :)
Alex

"Passionate hatred can give meaning and purpose to an empty life." -- Eric Hoffer
     Democrats run double filibuster - (JayMehaffey) - (27)
         Typical... - (jb4) - (9)
             Term limit - (JayMehaffey) - (8)
                 There shouldn't be a need for line item veto - (bepatient) - (5)
                     You'd need one more thing: - (inthane-chan) - (2)
                         Hear! Hear! To both of you! -NT - (jb4)
                         Aye! -NT - (bepatient)
                     I like the idea - (JayMehaffey) - (1)
                         Its already the law in alot of states. - (bepatient)
                 Sorry, must disagree. - (Simon_Jester) - (1)
                     Re: Sorry, must disagree. - (deSitter)
         Recess Appointments - (johnu) - (16)
             Federalist 67 - (Another Scott) - (15)
                 Re: Federalist 67 - (johnu) - (14)
                     Left of center? - (JayMehaffey) - (13)
                         Before Clinton, there was Reagan and - (a6l6e6x) - (2)
                             And before Reagan there was Johnson and Abe Fortas - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                 Yep, but Abe Fortas was tainted more than most. :) -NT - (a6l6e6x)
                         Re: Left of center? - (johnu) - (9)
                             Didn't Bush give up the ABA rating and recommendation? - (Simon_Jester)
                             Re: Left of center? - (JayMehaffey) - (7)
                                 Re: Left of center? - (johnu) - (6)
                                     Interesting peice - (JayMehaffey) - (5)
                                         The truth is somewhere in the middle - (johnu) - (4)
                                             Just calibrate your abscissa, is all.. - (Ashton)
                                             Re: The truth is somewhere in the middle - (rcareaga) - (2)
                                                 ROTFLMAO -NT - (Simon_Jester)
                                                 Re: The truth is somewhere in the middle (new thread) - (deSitter)

What. He. Said.
53 ms