SHIT SCOTT!!! - I'm FUCKING PARANOID (but I enjoyed it :-)

Post #93,992 by dmarker 4/3/03 1:08:16 AM Reply	SHIT SCOTT!!! - I'm FUCKING PARANOID (but I enjoyed it :-) <V B F Grin> Spectres from our past: Beware the future when your children & theirs come after you for what you may have been willing to condone today - dsm 2003 Motivational: When performing activities, ask yourself if the person you most want to be would do, or say, it - dsm 2003
Post #94,264 by dmarker 4/4/03 12:47:03 AM Reply	HEY SCOTT !!!!! - (flame) When I write something like the linked to post and place a Smiley + (V B Grin) I AM NOT fucking well stating it as a fact - just humour. Hookay !!!!!. If you want to state it as a fact elsewhere - please come back here ant let us 'discuss' it and your proofs<g>. Cheers Doug Spectres from our past: Beware the future when your children & theirs come after you for what you may have been willing to condone today - dsm 2003 Motivational: When performing activities, ask yourself if the person you most want to be would do, or say, it - dsm 2003
Post #94,327 by jake123 4/4/03 10:12:49 AM Reply	Listen, you really need to get away from this self-manipulation thing you seem to be doing. You keep answering yourself like that, you're gonna go blind. --\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton jake at consultron.ca \n [link\|http://consultron.ca\|http://consultron.ca] [link\|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca\|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] \n Kingston Ontario Canada [link\|news://news.consultron.ca\|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------
Post #94,435 by dmarker 4/4/03 6:47:57 PM Reply	Scott knows what the point was [link\|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=94178\|http://z.iwethey.org...w?contentid=94178] I was just letting him know what I thought of his comment (he failed to respond in that thread). If I were to state in a forum that you are psychotic I would not be surprised if you wanted to take me to task on the matter (on what basis). Paranoia is defined as a primary pyschosis (a known mental disorder with clearly defined symptoms) so either Scott knows what he is saying or he is using words that he doesn't (hole in the head syndrome <g>). If he wants to make a case I of it I want him to prove it. It is not hard to do. WE just list the clinical symptoms for it then test them against any known post. Easy. Doug Spectres from our past: Beware the future when your children & theirs come after you for what you may have been willing to condone today - dsm 2003 Motivational: When performing activities, ask yourself if the person you most want to be would do, or say, it - dsm 2003
Post #94,440 by admin 4/4/03 7:09:31 PM Reply	Clinical paranoia? No. Simple paranoia: ascribing sinister motives to normal things, sure. Your "Marlowe is Cybermace" assertion comes to mind. You also have a tendency to froth over anything you read about the war that portrays the Brits and/or US in a positive light, calling it all lies (cf. discussion about the reports of a rebellion in Basra). Call it "cage rattling" if you want. I call it [link\|http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=paranoia\|paranoia - 2 : a tendency on the part of an individual or group toward excessive or irrational suspiciousness and distrustfulness of others]. I think this post of yours itself is a good case in point. Most people, I think, would have treated my assertion of paranoia as the most obvious definition (the one I quoted above), given the context. That you immediately leapt to the conclusion that I was using the most overboard, outrageous definition only proves my point; your behavior is fairly consistent in this direction as well. Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Post #94,446 by dmarker 4/4/03 7:36:10 PM 4/4/03 7:39:15 PM Reply	Re: Clinical paranoia? No. Where did you find your definition - try this one - [link\|http://define.ansme.com/words/p/paranoia.html\|http://define.ansme....s/p/paranoia.html] -- Paranoia and this one [link\|http://www.healthyplace.com/communities/personality_disorders/site/paranoid_personality_disorder.htm\|http://www.healthypl...lity_disorder.htm] -- Paranoid Scott Did I state as a fact that Marlowe/Cybermace5 were the same person or did I pose it as a question ? Was the 'I accuse' post an accustaion, or a paranoid statement of fact ? (which seems to be your assertion) So how does this 'opinion' below of your's qualify me as 'paranoid' - what exactly is the paranoid aspect ? >You also have a tendency to froth over anything you read about the war that >portrays the Brits and/or US in a positive light, calling it all lies (cf. >discussion about the reports of a rebellion in Basra). Wasn't my point about the Basra claim that anyone who took the time to analyse it, could see there were gaping holes in the story ? Was I right about calling the Basra uprising propaganda ? >I think this post of yours itself is a good case in point. Most people, I >think, would have treated my assertion of paranoia as the most obvious >definition (the one I quoted above), given the context. That you immediately >leapt to the conclusion that I was using the most overboard, outrageous >definition only proves my point; your behavior is fairly consistent in this >direction as well. Bullshit! - what is an 'outrageous definition of paranoia' - all you have made a case for is that I am outspoken & can be combatitive - and that can be seen as a fair comment. Cheers Doug Spectres from our past: Beware the future when your children & theirs come after you for what you may have been willing to condone today - dsm 2003 Motivational: When performing activities, ask yourself if the person you most want to be would do, or say, it - dsm 2003 Edited by dmarker April 4, 2003, 07:39:15 PM EST Expand All History
Post #94,450 by admin 4/4/03 7:48:17 PM Reply	Goddamnit. Jesus, Doug, fucking read what I wrote. The definition of paranoia that you are assuming I am using IS NOT THE FUCKING DEFINITION I AM USING. I don't care how definitions of clinical psychotic paranoia you can find on the web. They are irrelevant. Got that? Was the 'I accuse' post an accustaion, or a paranoid statement of fact ? (which seems to be your assertion) Neither. It was a [link\|http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=paranoid\|paranoid: 2] accusation. It's the same kind of crap paranoia that leads people to accuse Michel Merlin of being multiple people, or people like Andy D. of being paid Microsoft shills. I get really fucking tired of people seeing conspiracies under every bed and in every closet. Wasn't my point about the Basra claim that anyone who took the time to analyse it, could see there were gaping holes in the story ? Actually, there were gaping holes in your paranoid ideas that the Brits were making it up (local informers, British mortar-tracking radar, etc). It's HOW you phrase your accusations, and your immediate assumption that the correct explanation of a particular situation is the one that portrays the British and US actors in the most sinister light. Read that definition I linked again. Got it? what is an 'outrageous definition of paranoia' One that assumes clinical psychosis, in this context, which you are conveniently ignoring. Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Post #94,501 by dmarker 4/5/03 1:35:31 AM Reply	Gee Scott don't get hysterical - calm down son >Jesus, Doug, fucking read what I wrote. Just don't get so emotional, makes you look supremely defensive <g>. You still haven't explained the connections. Still seems to me you don't know what it really means, only a colloquial interpretation !!!. How does making an accusation become paranoia unless there is no basis or evidence that the accusation may have any merit? But best of all, lets get back to your argumnent that you can prove I am paranoid because of my reaction to your accusation !!! - that logic is about as illogical as one can get. (from your post)... >> I think this post of yours itself is a good case in point. Most people, I think, would have treated my assertion of paranoia as the most obvious definition (the one I quoted above), given the context. That you immediately leapt to the conclusion that I was using the most overboard, outrageous definition only proves my point; your behavior is fairly consistent in this direction as well. << S: You are Paranoid (Excessive) D: Prove it S: Your reaction to my accustation is proof D: What a crock of illogical shit! Cheers Doug Spectres from our past: Beware the future when your children & theirs come after you for what you may have been willing to condone today - dsm 2003 Motivational: When performing activities, ask yourself if the person you most want to be would do, or say, it - dsm 2003
Post #94,526 by admin 4/5/03 9:21:21 AM Reply	Er, which forum IS this? Still seems to me you don't know what it really means, only a colloquial interpretation !!!. Last time I respond to this. I'm getting the feeling that you are being intentionally dense on this. Why the fuck you think a dictionary definition is colloquial, well, I dunno. 2 : a tendency on the part of an individual or group toward excessive or irrational suspiciousness and distrustfulness of others Read it again until you get it through your head that this is 1) the definition I am using and 2) it is a dictionary, not colloquial, definition. More like this: S. You're acting paranoid. D. I am not psychotic! S. I didn't say you were, and the fact that you are assuming I did looks, well, paranoid. D. I am not psychotic! And unless you stop pulling a Norm here, I'm going to call this EOT. Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Post #94,548 by rcareaga 4/5/03 10:38:11 AM Reply	boys, boys... This exchange is (IMO, to be sure) diverting both of you from more useful contributions elsewhere. But for the subject I would suggest one of you invoke my favorite ploy for exiting from realworld discussions that threaten to become disruptively confrontational, a suave "Well, this is a matter upon which reasonable men may reasonably disagree," but you can see the problem here. Nevertheless, I advise you to let it go--and as the older man, Doug, you should drop your end of the chain first, don't you think? cordially, "Die Welt ist alles, was der Fall ist."
Post #94,550 by admin 4/5/03 10:48:01 AM Reply	Read the forum title, fuckwit. This is what is supposed to happen in here. And what's this twaddle about the older man should drop it first? Senility confers grace, is that the idea? "Just A Few Thoughts" We now return you to our normally scheduled twaddle. Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Post #94,552 by rcareaga 4/5/03 11:10:51 AM 4/5/03 12:26:21 PM Reply	(whack!) OK, point taken. And yes, decrepitude (to refashion your harsher formulation) confers grace, and the older man yields the point, with an avuncular chuckle, to the hot-blooded youngster--many societies have employed this tactic (combined, to be sure, with a judicious leveraging of the vindictive silverbacks' other resources to fuck over the insolent young bucks in the sweet by-and-by) to maintain the appearance of civil traffic. This is eerily reminiscent of an episode that occurred on the eve of my wedding 27 years ago: the bride-to-be and her mother, both of whom were operating well beyond their normal stress tolerances, began to argue over some trivial point. Within minutes the exchange became quite shrill (a side of my bride I had never seen in six years of courtship, but one, alas, I was to see with some frequency thereafter), and the future father-in-law and I looked at one another, concerned. "Should we intervene?" I asked. "I'm not sure it would really do any good," replied the ff-i-l. "I'll try," I said foolishly. "Ladies, if perhaps at this point the voice of masculine reason could intervene--" I will not relate the rest of the painful scene, as both women briefly made common cause and spewed their combined fury at my blameless young self before resuming the catfight. I staggered outdoors into the sultry Southern California dusk, joined by the ff-i-l, who very decently revived me over the next half hour with a couple of excellent frozen margaritas. There was a moral there, and I will apply it with the appropriate adjustments to the present dustup. cordially, [edit:typo] "Die Welt ist alles, was der Fall ist." Edited by rcareaga April 5, 2003, 12:26:21 PM EST Expand All History
Post #94,554 by admin 4/5/03 11:16:11 AM Reply	Re: (whack!) Hot-blooded, I believe you will find, more accurately describes Mr. Marker (as he will probably even admit). As far as cat-fights go... well, 'nuff said, I wot. Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Post #94,565 by deSitter 4/5/03 1:38:39 PM Reply	Shut the fuck up Ross, you ignorant fuckwit! heh heh I love flaming myself. -drl Though my feet aren't on the ground, I've been standing on the sound Of some open hearted people, going down.
Post #94,578 by dmarker 4/5/03 4:36:46 PM 4/5/03 4:49:46 PM Reply	I will try to depart from this with this last post Definitions of Paranoia Paranoid Characteristics: Persecution, Grandeur (delusions) Pattern 1 - Persecution ... Paranoic person: 'They' are out to 'get' (me,us) ! Rational observer: Who are they ? Paranoic person: Them ! Rational observer: Where are they - point one out ? Paranoic person: They are everywhere ! Rational observer: I can't determine who they, or where these 'they', are ! Paranoic person: Back off man, you are probably one of them ! Pattern 2 - Grandeur Paranoic person: I am on a mission to save the (world, country, group) Rational observer: What are you going to save (world, country, group) from ? Paranoic person: Those who are out to harm (world, country, group) or even themselves ! Rational observer: Who are they ? (now switch to persecution thread) ***************************************** My points ? 1) The above are two realistic interpretations of Paranoia and Paranoid. 2) Switch 'them' with (lefties, liberals, saddam lovers etc:) Then start asking who in IWETHEY best fits the patterns. Cheers Doug Marker Spectres from our past: Beware the future when your children & theirs come after you for what you may have been willing to condone today - dsm 2003 Motivational: When performing activities, ask yourself if the person you most want to be would do, or say, it - dsm 2003 Edited by dmarker April 5, 2003, 04:48:51 PM EST Edited by dmarker April 5, 2003, 04:49:46 PM EST Expand All History
Post #94,588 by CRConrad 4/5/03 6:11:36 PM Reply	And your answer to Scott in this thread WAS an example of 1.
Post #94,627 by dmarker 4/6/03 12:10:34 AM Reply	So Mr Rescuer (look it up) tossing fuel on the fire <g> Spectres from our past: Beware the future when your children & theirs come after you for what you may have been willing to condone today - dsm 2003 Motivational: When performing activities, ask yourself if the person you most want to be would do, or say, it - dsm 2003
Post #94,681 by CRConrad 4/6/03 4:02:28 PM Reply	No "toss", just summing up the facts after your "last" post.
Post #94,685 by dmarker 4/6/03 5:02:22 PM 4/6/03 5:04:55 PM Reply	CRC - 'facts' are there is no element of 'Them' out to get (us,me) in the exchange sequence. This is a barnyard scrap long in the brewing (based on Scott's detour back to MM etc:). It was triggered by Scott taking a poke after I made a post [link\|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=94171\|http://z.iwethey.org...w?contentid=94171] and him making his 'excessive paranoia' quit. The most you can argue is that I am giving scott a hard time over the meaning of the words Paranoia & Paranoid. He is using a dumbed down definition in defense of his comment and I am using the accepted medical definition. That part of the scrap doesn't constitue paranoia in itself. It must also be obvious that most of us are under stress, the war (again Scott doesn't like the things I say about US/Brit involvement, he brought that up), in addition Scott has just been through a violent house storm & I am trying to land a job. All factors that make people testy. So perhaps we should just let this fire burn out even if it does not appear to have resolved anything. To Scott I say, I won't be holding any grudges, isn't it about time he got over MM etc:. Hookay Cheers Doug Spectres from our past: Beware the future when your children & theirs come after you for what you may have been willing to condone today - dsm 2003 Motivational: When performing activities, ask yourself if the person you most want to be would do, or say, it - dsm 2003 Edited by dmarker April 6, 2003, 05:04:55 PM EDT Expand All History
Post #94,692 by CRConrad 4/6/03 5:39:53 PM Reply	Yeah, sure, but rest assured... ...that what's "dumbed down" here is the FACT THAT YOU ARE giving Scott "a hard time" over the meaning of the words 'paranoia' and 'paranoid'. What he is using is a perfectly ordinary everyday definition that, as he showed, HAS long ago graduated from "collocquialism" to dictionary-worthy. And what DOES constitute paranoia (in THIS sense!) on your part, is your immediate jumping to the erroneous conclusion that he was (or fucking well SHOULD be -- why the HELL should he?) -- using the stupid fucking clinical "accepted medical definition". What the fuck IS this place, you think -- a clinical psychologist convention?!? Furthermore, A) If hunting for a job makes you too fucking "testy" to behave like a fucking civilized human being, why don't you just shut the fuck up until you've got one? and, B) What the FUCK kind of an excuse for "being testy" is "the war"?!? Are you labouring under the delusion that this American-Army-Live-Ammo-Excercise-cum-Televised-Video-War-Game has ANY fucking immediate bearing on ANYTHING, if you're not either i) in the American Army, ii) an Iraqi, or iii) a major Haliburton/Exxon/Shell-BP shareholder? If you are, you seriously need to get your head out of your arse. It's fucking entertainment! (_Absurd_ entertainment, yeah, sure -- but it's TOO freaking absurd to be taken as anything BUT entertainment!) BTW, you also need to do that in relation to China being in any way a paragon of fucking anything; "Cybermace" may be an annoying little twat, but he IS right that the Chinese are just thugs, and that them having been thugs for a long time is certainly nothing to drool with admiration for them about. Oh, and of course you doubly need to get your head out of your arse if you think you're going to get away with yet another instance of this highly annoying habit of yours: Repeated high-faluting gibbering about how something will be your "last post in this thread" -- and then NOT shutting the fuck up and letting someone ELSE have the last word, for fucking oncce. No fucking WAY, Bubba. [link\|mailto:MyUserId@MyISP.CountryCode\|Christian R. Conrad] (I live in Finland, and my e-mail in-box is at the Saunalahti company.) Your lies are of Microsoftian Scale and boring to boot. Your 'depression' may be the closest you ever come to recognizing truth: you have no 'inferiority complex', you are inferior - and something inside you recognizes this. - [link\|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=71575\|Ashton Brown]
Post #94,874 by dmarker 4/7/03 6:15:30 PM 4/7/03 9:21:02 PM Reply	Screeching silverback slings shit, starts savage gorilla war There there BIG boy, now put that tree trunk down and while your at it you can drop those fistfuls of feces (yeccchhh, your covered in the stuff). That's it slowly does it now get back in yer frigging cage, theres a nice cold schnapps in there somewhere... CLANGGG !!! (yup, that Schnapps trick works every time) RIGHT now LOOK HERE you five foot foaming fang faced foul featured flea flecked filthy furry flatulant fecund friggin freak, thats enough! NO MORE BANNANAS for a month, and yer off the Schnapps as well. And while we are at it leave-the-friggin-Pandas-alone !!! they never did anything to annoy you. Fer chissake, it only takes a mention of how good Pandas are and you become excessively 'bear-annoyed'. And, it just isn't good enough to claim your bad behaviour was triggered because someone had ruffled the feathers of the Antarctic Owl. He can fly without your interference. Sheesh, everyone knows it is your mouth that is the scourge of this whole friggin zoo. And another complaint, you already know the Zoo's resident psychiatrist Dr Orin Ootan, and his assistant Jim Pansee, well they are seriously concerned at your repeated tendancy to oral aggression. To be sure, no one minds the odd bite here or there but you have bitten just about everyone in this damned place. SO!!! To teach you a lesson we are moving you, for a whole week, in with Mr Ali Ghayta & his whole extended family. If that doesn't cure you of your biting fetish nothing will. Orin & Jim have also reminded us of your famous and unhealty obsession with crude sexual matters. It is well known that you can hardly open your mouth without talking about sexual acts (and that is the real reason we are confiscating your bananas). Enough is enough - learn to behave, of its off to the fur factory for you big boy. Doug Marker <vbg> Spectres from our past: Beware the future when your children & theirs come after you for what you may have been willing to condone today - dsm 2003 Motivational: When performing activities, ask yourself if the person you most want to be would do, or say, it - dsm 2003 Edited by dmarker April 7, 2003, 07:26:08 PM EDT Edited by dmarker April 7, 2003, 09:21:02 PM EDT Expand All History
Post #94,904 by deSitter 4/7/03 7:37:55 PM Reply	Damn cobber you're pretty fired up! Can't wait to visit! I need to hang out with some Shielas! -drl Though my feet aren't on the ground, I've been standing on the sound Of some open hearted people, going down.
Post #94,922 by boxley 4/7/03 8:53:45 PM Reply	betrter off in HK even the colds carry std's there comes from snatch sneezin thanx, bill will work for cash and other incentives [link\|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html\|skill set] questions, help? [link\|mailto:pappas@catholic.org\|email pappas at catholic.org] Since corporations are the equivelent of human but they have no "concience" they are by definition sociopaths
Post #95,000 by CRConrad 4/8/03 9:40:48 AM Reply	So, trying to make a joke of it, eh? Too fucking bad... ...for you that I was being perfectly fucking serious. ...drop those fistfuls of feces (yeccchhh, your covered in the stuff). If anyone here's got egg all over his face, it's YOU, shit-face! RIGHT now LOOK HERE you five foot foaming fang faced foul featured flea flecked filthy furry flatulant fecund friggin freak, thats enough! Five foot nine, fuckyouverymuch... And what's "enough" is, as I said, your a) stupid attack on Scott (we're still waiting for the apology, and above all, for you to even ADMIT you were wrong), b) your sickening fawning over the thuggish Chinks (not that I've checked in your silly WarGame Forum, but I'll bet you haven't retracted on that either), and c) your vapid and irrational excuses. Oh, and your pathetic attempts at what you apparently consider "humour" are getting pretty old, too. Yes, right from the get-go -- they're born stale. NO MORE BANNANAS for a month, and yer off the Schnapps as well. If anyone needs to lay off the sauce, it is you, Bubba -- then maybe you'll be able to spell 'banana'. And while we are at it leave-the-friggin-Pandas-alone !!! they never did anything to annoy you. Fer chissake, it only takes a mention of how good Pandas are and you become excessively 'bear-annoyed'. Pandas suck. And, since it seems you're using "pandas" as a code-word for Chinese, they suck too. And, it just isn't good enough to claim your bad behaviour was triggered because someone had ruffled the feathers of the Antarctic Owl. He can fly without your interference. Sheesh, everyone knows it is your mouth that is the scourge of this whole friggin zoo. Huh?!? What fucking "owl" are you gibbering about? (Norm's buddy? But he's a she, and has nothing what-the-fuck-ever to do with this...) Scott? Yeah, of fucking COURSE he can defend himself -- but then, who the fuck said it was him I was "defending"?!? It's myself I'm trying to protect -- from having to read too much more of your UTTER FUCKING DRIVEL! And another complaint, you already know the Zoo's resident psychiatrist Dr Orin Ootan, and his assistant Jim Pansee, well they are seriously concerned at your repeated tendancy to oral aggression. Fuck your monkey buddies, Bubba... You know that's what you really want to do, you old simiophile, so go ahead; don't let me stop you. To be sure, no one minds the odd bite here or there but you have bitten just about everyone in this damned place. Only when they needed it. And you, Mister Magic Marker, were long overdue. Orin & Jim have also reminded us of your famous and unhealty obsession with crude sexual matters. It is well known that you can hardly open your mouth without talking about sexual acts (and that is the real reason we are confiscating your bananas). As I said, fuck your furry buddies, and fuck you too. If that's too awkward (what, not even if you stand on a chair?), then let them do it... Anyway, the bananas-as-phallos-symbols gimmick is, I would have thought, too crudely simplistic even for a simpering baboon like you. Enough is enough - learn to behave, of its off to the fur factory for you big boy. And to the glue factory with you -- or is that only horses' bones they make glue from, not horses' arses? [link\|mailto:MyUserId@MyISP.CountryCode\|Christian R. Conrad] (I live in Finland, and my e-mail in-box is at the Saunalahti company.) Your lies are of Microsoftian Scale and boring to boot. Your 'depression' may be the closest you ever come to recognizing truth: you have no 'inferiority complex', you are inferior - and something inside you recognizes this. - [link\|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=71575\|Ashton Brown]
Post #96,035 by screamer 4/11/03 11:19:50 AM Reply	Can I use this? Fuck your monkey buddies, Bubba... You know that's what you really want to do, you old simiophile, so go ahead; don't let me stop you. Although some may protest (and Doug, not a comment on this thread's "merits"), I vote this as one of CRC's more quotable lines... Just giving credit where credit is due, Screamer Living is easy with eyes closed misunderstanding all you see, it's getting hard to be someone but it all works out it doesn't matter much to me J. Lennon - Strawberry Fields Forever
Post #96,036 by inthane-chan 4/11/03 11:22:47 AM Reply	ObSentientLRPD: "Possibly."
Post #96,131 by CRConrad 4/11/03 7:58:17 PM Reply	Depends... El Screamo: [Can I] use this? Fuck your monkey buddies, Bubba... You know that's what you really want to do, you old simiophile, so go ahead; don't let me stop you. What for? [link\|mailto:MyUserId@MyISP.CountryCode\|Christian R. Conrad] (I live in Finland, and my e-mail in-box is at the Saunalahti company.) Your lies are of Microsoftian Scale and boring to boot. Your 'depression' may be the closest you ever come to recognizing truth: you have no 'inferiority complex', you are inferior - and something inside you recognizes this. - [link\|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=71575\|Ashton Brown]
Post #96,133 by Ashton 4/11/03 8:02:39 PM Reply	\ufffd Snidely Whiplash (betcha don't know Who He?) {snort}
Post #96,138 by CRConrad 4/11/03 8:10:35 PM Reply	No, gotta admit I don't... ...know who "Snidely Whiplash" is. Judging from the name itself, though, I think I can say it belongs in quotation marks... Further enlightenment welcome. [link\|mailto:MyUserId@MyISP.CountryCode\|Christian R. Conrad] (I live in Finland, and my e-mail in-box is at the Saunalahti company.) Your lies are of Microsoftian Scale and boring to boot. Your 'depression' may be the closest you ever come to recognizing truth: you have no 'inferiority complex', you are inferior - and something inside you recognizes this. - [link\|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=71575\|Ashton Brown]
Post #96,139 by Another Scott 4/11/03 8:16:02 PM Reply	You don't know "Dudley Do-Right"?!?! No wonder you're so confused about all the goodness in everything American. Sheesh! [link\|http://flyingmoose.org/moose/whiplash.htm\|Dudley Do-Right] for the Google impaired. And no, I don't care that Dudley was a Canadian Mountie! So there! :-) Cheers, Scott.
Post #96,145 by CRConrad 4/11/03 8:22:43 PM Reply	"Oh, my darling Clementine..." Of bloody course I know Dudley! Fuck, I practically AM Dudley Do-Right! (OK, except for my use of strong language.) How the FUCK does me not remembering some OTHER guy imply I don't know Dudley?!? (It doesn't, except you don't know DIDDLY!) Hey, it's been two or three decades since I used to watch him on the tube, so it's no big fucking wonder I'd forgotten the name of the standing villain (? or, again judging from the name, possibly a lawyer), is it? [link\|mailto:MyUserId@MyISP.CountryCode\|Christian R. Conrad] (I live in Finland, and my e-mail in-box is at the Saunalahti company.) Your lies are of Microsoftian Scale and boring to boot. Your 'depression' may be the closest you ever come to recognizing truth: you have no 'inferiority complex', you are inferior - and something inside you recognizes this. - [link\|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=71575\|Ashton Brown]
Post #96,127 by Ashton 4/11/03 7:45:07 PM Reply	Penalty flag - ecological Super-Fund site Such hydrocoptic virtuosity wasted on a mere bagatelle..! Now let's get down to animal husbandry and survival of the species: First - ya need to fabricate some 'Press' credentials. Then - the zIWE Irregulars pass-hat for steerage passage + pretzels. Last - somehow we gets ya into the White House as furrin Press THEN.. You Ask Ari a Question. With er 'follow-up'. Got it?
Post #94,702 by orion 4/6/03 6:34:00 PM Reply	Give it up already quit being, for lack of a better word, a me. This argument can server no further purpose than to keep the flames going. My advice to you is to just end your posts, and don't reply to any more of them in this thread and let it go. Life goes on without more gas on the fire. "Bill gates cannot guarantee Windows, so how are you going to guarantee my safety?" -John Crichton to the Emperor of the Scarrans on [link\|http://www.farscape.com\|FarScape]
Post #94,731 by dmarker 4/6/03 10:36:00 PM Reply	10 points - your post & advice good <g> Spectres from our past: Beware the future when your children & theirs come after you for what you may have been willing to condone today - dsm 2003 Motivational: When performing activities, ask yourself if the person you most want to be would do, or say, it - dsm 2003
Post #94,747 by Ashton 4/6/03 11:46:11 PM Reply	12 points for self-effacing aptness :-\ufffd
Post #96,028 by screamer 4/11/03 11:06:05 AM Reply	Let me try... Screamer, you suck... It does feel pretty good. Just a few thoughts, Screamer Living is easy with eyes closed misunderstanding all you see, it's getting hard to be someone but it all works out it doesn't matter much to me J. Lennon - Strawberry Fields Forever
Post #96,132 by Ashton 4/11/03 7:59:44 PM Reply	Dare-I deride?___Dorky Doddering Dreck, disdainfully dawdles - defuzes dastardy deeds; denies despicable double-dipping dinosaurs - disseminates dilettantish documentaries (deriving duplicitous dangerous dogmas) .. diligently: deprecates divinely delicious drama.. Yup, yer gettin the hang of it - Alliteration Addicts Anonymous :-\ufffd
Post #96,137 by Another Scott 4/11/03 8:10:10 PM Reply	Ashton consecutively, disturbingly, eloquent Brown. :-)
Post #94,593 by Ashton 4/5/03 6:51:58 PM Reply	OT re Mr. MM Do you recall some times when his replies were uncharacteristically grammatical? IIRC this was the phenom which fed the illusion? fact? of 'difference'.. I may even have saved some samples on the 486.. if it still boots, and I can remeber what Doze 3.1 looks like. Natch some of the Positive Assertions got out of line, but Just wondering how you came to the conclusion that say, "no one ever borrowed? his login". I still believe that, if it was not someone else at the kb, that someone was alongside editing his ranguage (and particularly the idioms) -- So how about it.. wanna be a Brilliant and agreeable cohort - or a Despicable Doubting Scott? (The stakes are almost as high as in academe ;-)
Post #94,597 by admin 4/5/03 7:43:48 PM Reply	His English was better when he took the time. The more frothing and hurried he was, the worse his command of the language became. Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Post #96,025 by screamer 4/11/03 11:03:57 AM Reply	Lotta crap hanging around in this shithole of a forum section. Thanks for remembering me and that "little exchange" that rcaragea was man enough to defer to me... LMAO. How's this for paranoia? I think that rcaragea is Ashton... :-) I always thought that you were an alter ego for Brett Glass... and that MM was really npetreley. :-O I am always reminded of Slim Whitman in "Blazing Saddles", "gee, boss, you use your mouth slicker than a $20 (freedom) whore"... :-) I'm around pseudo intellectuals all damn day long. I come to places like this to get away from that claptrap. How's this for paranoia, I think that the communists are still around and passing out "word for a day" calendars to every American (Except US) just to drive us all crazy. Just a few observations, Screamer Putting Descarte before des horse in South Bend. K. Trout
Post #96,136 by Ashton 4/11/03 8:08:04 PM Reply	{Oooooh.. gotta savor This One for_____later}__munchies!
Post #94,496 by boxley 4/5/03 12:26:29 AM Reply	gwielo ate too many dog ears in his dim sum whaddya expect. He is now chewing down on boiled beef and biscuits. his gravy train has left the station expect paranoia supreme until he learns how to order a taco without a side of cat dung poo. thanx, bill will work for cash and other incentives [link\|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html\|skill set] questions, help? [link\|mailto:pappas@catholic.org\|email pappas at catholic.org] Since corporations are the equivelent of human but they have no "concience" they are by definition sociopaths
Post #94,500 by dmarker 4/5/03 1:29:02 AM Reply	Run away Bill, Scott is a big boy ! Spectres from our past: Beware the future when your children & theirs come after you for what you may have been willing to condone today - dsm 2003 Motivational: When performing activities, ask yourself if the person you most want to be would do, or say, it - dsm 2003
Post #94,746 by boxley 4/6/03 11:40:47 PM Reply	gwielo ate too many dog ears in his dim sum (new thread) Created as new thread #94745 titled [link\|/forums/render/content/show?contentid=94745\|gwielo ate too many dog ears in his dim sum] will work for cash and other incentives [link\|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html\|skill set] questions, help? [link\|mailto:pappas@catholic.org\|email pappas at catholic.org] Since corporations are the equivelent of human but they have no "concience" they are by definition sociopaths
Post #94,332 by admin 4/4/03 10:24:33 AM Reply	? Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."

Welcome to IWETHEY!