I believe I was not in essence, claiming any thing different about them than what happened with Microsoft during the 'BARKTO' affair of which I was a participant.
BARKTO and others, it was latter admited, were executives of MS who adopted aliases organised by MS public relations man Rick Segal, & claimed to be customers of competing vendors. Their goal was to go into discussion groups to attack these competitors.
But, as already said. The horse is now dead.
Lets get back to normal <grin>
DSM
# Rick Segal (not Sewell)
[link|http://lists.essential.org/1998/am-info/msg01529.html|http://lists.essenti...nfo/msg01529.html] Joe Barr's BARKTO write-up (Joe was there)
[link|http://w3.hethmon.com/os2isp/1999/Aug/Msgs/l2w15889.html|http://w3.hethmon.co...sgs/l2w15889.html] Another MS related incident.
Later info that emerged via Will Zachmann that other execs including Ballmer & Gates had admitted to doing similar.