or are you unable to ?

By quoting a segment, we can at least determine its relevance, then agree or disagree on the substance behind it (is it or isn't it 'bullcrap'.

If *you* say it is bullcrap, at least have the additional integrity to highlight what it is that is the bullcrap. Not doing so suggests you really don't know. It may well be that some aspects of the articles can be fairly called that but let us at least know what & then deal with it.

By the way, did you ever belong to a debating team at school ? - do you have any rules by which we can debate, can you suggest any that are commonly acceptable so that we can at least seperate generalist verbiage from reasoned argument that either of us may put forward ???

Cheers

Doug Marker