So our current regime is a bunch of idiots?

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 1 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #92,703 by Brandioch 3/28/03 11:08:19 PM Reply	So our current regime is a bunch of idiots? Well, they should have known not to trust anything coming from Nigera. I'm sure it started off with "FROM JOHN ZMABOSLY. URGENTLY ADVICE UPON YOUR READING. THIS MATTER I TRUST YOU SHALL AND I HANDLE IN THE UTMOST OF CONFIDENCE AND DISCREETLY." So you admit that they were wrong on that one item. But you claim that all of the other examples are worthless? ahahhahahahahahahahahaah
Post #92,705 by cybermace5 3/28/03 11:14:13 PM Reply	Re: So our current regime is a bunch of idiots? You obviously missed something. That document was handed to them by a foreign source that apparently at least one lackey trusted. Stuff gains credibility as it rises up the chain of command. That is a HUGE difference from stating wild theories such as self-terrorism and manufacturing entire weapons dumps and banned bio/chem weapons.
Post #92,712 by Brandioch 3/28/03 11:24:54 PM Reply	You are wrong, again. Stuff gains credibility as it rises up the chain of command. No, you are wrong. Stuff gains credibility when it is CHECKED and VERIFIED by the appropriate agencies. Well, unless you're an idiot or someone with an agenda who doesn't WANT it checked and verified. Hmmm, like our current regime.
Post #92,715 by boxley 3/28/03 11:32:09 PM Reply	Side note. Brandi is right when he stresses the idiocy of current and also the past administration. These people are quite a bit less smarter than the folks around here and a lot more venal. Remember W.C. Fields you cant cheat an honest man. Intel gets swagged, ignored and filtered by policy wonks with agendas as opposed to collecting humint or elintas opposed to the old verification and rated before being sent to analysts without agendas. This product would then be presented by people with agendas but with access to the datastream. Classic example was Gore being duped by the Russians because of filters imposed by the top down. thanx, bill will work for cash and other incentives [link\|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html\|skill set] questions, help? [link\|mailto:pappas@catholic.org\|email pappas at catholic.org] Since corporations are the equivelent of human but they have no "concience" they are by definition sociopaths

We need to find WMDs - (JayMehaffey) - (60) - March 28, 2003, 08:00:11 PM EST

Re: We need to find WMDs - (cybermace5) - (59) - March 28, 2003, 08:58:10 PM EST

Marlowe REALLY needs to brief you better. :D - (Brandioch) - (45) - March 28, 2003, 09:59:22 PM EST

Re: Marlowe REALLY needs to brief you better. :D - (cybermace5) - (44) - March 28, 2003, 10:07:13 PM EST

I'll read that as "I was wrong". :D - (Brandioch) - (43) - March 28, 2003, 10:09:29 PM EST

Re: I'll read that as "I was wrong". :D - (cybermace5) - (42) - March 28, 2003, 10:17:44 PM EST

I'll read that as "I was wrong and I'm sorry". - (Brandioch) - (38) - March 28, 2003, 10:23:39 PM EST

Re: I'll read that as "I was wrong and I'm sorry". - (cybermace5) - (37) - March 28, 2003, 10:39:16 PM EST

That was a reference to a book. - (Brandioch) - (36) - March 28, 2003, 10:53:25 PM EST

Re: That was a reference to a book. - (cybermace5) - (35) - March 28, 2003, 10:58:53 PM EST

Get ABC news to post it, with references. - (Brandioch) - (34) - March 28, 2003, 11:10:56 PM EST

Re: Get ABC news to post it, with references. - (cybermace5) - (33) - March 28, 2003, 11:15:20 PM EST

They do rate higher in veracity than you do. - (Brandioch) - (32) - March 28, 2003, 11:22:30 PM EST

Re: They do rate higher in veracity than you do. - (cybermace5) - (31) - March 28, 2003, 11:56:21 PM EST

That's what I gave you. - (Brandioch) - (30) - March 28, 2003, 11:57:39 PM EST

Re: That's what I gave you. - (cybermace5) - (28) - March 29, 2003, 12:02:15 AM EST

Nice, you can't refute it so you'll dismiss it. :D - (Brandioch) - (27) - March 29, 2003, 12:02:56 AM EST

Re: Nice, you can't refute it so you'll dismiss it. :D - (cybermace5) - (26) - March 29, 2003, 12:06:45 AM EST

And I said that where? - (Brandioch) - (25) - March 29, 2003, 12:12:44 PM EST

Thanks for the free one. - (cybermace5) - (24) - March 29, 2003, 01:47:31 PM EST

And I deliver ANOTHER SMACKDOWN!!! - (Brandioch) - (23) - March 29, 2003, 03:05:03 PM EST

Directly upon yourself. - (cybermace5) - (20) - March 29, 2003, 03:31:15 PM EST

Interesting triage, given the context. - (Ashton) - (11) - March 29, 2003, 07:20:18 PM EST

Re: Interesting triage, given the context. - (cybermace5) - (10) - March 29, 2003, 07:43:32 PM EST

Re: Interesting triage, given the context. - (rcareaga) - (2) - March 29, 2003, 08:00:54 PM EST

Let us all hope no one brings out the worst. -NT - (cybermace5) - (1) - March 29, 2003, 08:26:38 PM EST

be afraid. be very afraid. -NT - (rcareaga) - March 29, 2003, 08:44:05 PM EST

Sorry, Bub - (Ashton) - (6) - March 29, 2003, 08:15:37 PM EST

Prose....HA! - (cybermace5) - (5) - March 29, 2003, 08:18:34 PM EST

Re: Prose....HA! - (rcareaga) - (4) - March 29, 2003, 08:23:53 PM EST

Re: Prose....HA! - (cybermace5) - (3) - March 29, 2003, 10:19:58 PM EST

What's with Marlowe and friends? - (Brandioch) - March 29, 2003, 11:38:27 PM EST

Hmmm - the W.. or E.. Coast menagerie? - (Ashton) - (1) - March 30, 2003, 02:43:13 AM EST

Neither. -NT - (cybermace5) - March 30, 2003, 02:49:33 AM EST

Oooh, ANOTHER SMACKDOWN! - (Brandioch) - (7) - March 29, 2003, 11:35:17 PM EST

Re: Oooh, ANOTHER SMACKDOWN! - (cybermace5) - (6) - March 30, 2003, 01:05:58 AM EST

And yet ANOTHER SMACKDOWN! - (Brandioch) - (5) - March 30, 2003, 01:58:15 AM EST

Re: And yet ANOTHER SMACKDOWN! - (cybermace5) - (4) - March 30, 2003, 02:47:34 AM EST

It is the feared QUADRUPAL SMACKDOWN! - (Brandioch) - (3) - March 30, 2003, 03:04:30 AM EST

It's spelled QUADRUPLE, and IDIOT!! - (cybermace5) - (2) - March 30, 2003, 03:08:36 AM EST

It's spelled QUINTUPLE! - (Brandioch) - (1) - March 30, 2003, 03:23:01 AM EST

Re: It's spelled QUINTUPLE! - (cybermace5) - March 30, 2003, 01:33:58 PM EST

Own Goal! -NT - (orion) - March 29, 2003, 04:43:00 PM EST

You shouldn't hit yourself so hard. -NT - (bepatient) - March 29, 2003, 04:47:20 PM EST

This is the part where.. - (bepatient) - March 29, 2003, 12:19:51 AM EST

I have no problem with calling it bullcrap - (dmarker) - (2) - March 28, 2003, 10:23:48 PM EST

Re: I have no problem with calling it bullcrap - (cybermace5) - (1) - March 28, 2003, 10:36:13 PM EST

Once again - quote the part that is bullcrap !!!! - (dmarker) - March 29, 2003, 07:09:20 AM EST

What do you expect? - (JayMehaffey) - (12) - March 28, 2003, 10:36:52 PM EST

Re: What do you expect? - (cybermace5) - (11) - March 28, 2003, 10:42:40 PM EST

Does "Niger" ring a bell? - (Brandioch) - (10) - March 28, 2003, 10:51:02 PM EST

Re: Does "Niger" ring a bell? - (cybermace5) - (9) - March 28, 2003, 11:03:19 PM EST

So our current regime is a bunch of idiots? - (Brandioch) - (3) - March 28, 2003, 11:08:19 PM EST

Re: So our current regime is a bunch of idiots? - (cybermace5) - (2) - March 28, 2003, 11:14:13 PM EST

You are wrong, again. - (Brandioch) - March 28, 2003, 11:24:54 PM EST

Side note. Brandi is right when he stresses the idiocy of - (boxley) - March 28, 2003, 11:32:09 PM EST

Re: Does "Niger" ring a bell? - (rcareaga) - (4) - March 29, 2003, 01:43:25 PM EST

Re: Does "Niger" ring a bell? - (cybermace5) - (1) - March 29, 2003, 01:02:47 PM EST

Translation: "I have trouble reading English." -NT - (Brandioch) - March 29, 2003, 03:05:52 PM EST

I'd also like to pose a personal attack. - (cybermace5) - (1) - March 29, 2003, 02:13:24 PM EST

**Yes!!** It **rings a bell!** -NT - (rcareaga) - March 29, 2003, 02:15:47 PM EST

tar: Premature end of archive
150 ms