Re: I have no problem with calling it bullcrap

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 1 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #92,677

by cybermace5

3/28/03 10:36:13 PM

Re: I have no problem with calling it bullcrap

Generalizations without reference or rebuttal are the real bullcrap here.

And that is precisely what those articles are. If you seriously believe the CIA was responsible for domestic terrorism, you are more gullible than I can possibly imagine. Since you are defending those articles, I ask you to provide additional proof of the statements within.

Add another layer to the tinfoil hat.

Post #92,763

by dmarker

3/29/03 7:09:20 AM

Once again - quote the part that is bullcrap !!!!

or are you unable to ?

By quoting a segment, we can at least determine its relevance, then agree or disagree on the substance behind it (is it or isn't it 'bullcrap'.

If *you* say it is bullcrap, at least have the additional integrity to highlight what it is that is the bullcrap. Not doing so suggests you really don't know. It may well be that some aspects of the articles can be fairly called that but let us at least know what & then deal with it.

By the way, did you ever belong to a debating team at school ? - do you have any rules by which we can debate, can you suggest any that are commonly acceptable so that we can at least seperate generalist verbiage from reasoned argument that either of us may put forward ???

Cheers

Doug Marker

Spectres from our past: Beware the future when your children & theirs come after you for what you may have been willing to condone today - dsm 2003

Motivational: When performing activities, ask yourself if the person you most want to be would do, or say, it - dsm 2003

We need to find WMDs - (JayMehaffey) - (60) - March 28, 2003, 08:00:11 PM EST

Re: We need to find WMDs - (cybermace5) - (59) - March 28, 2003, 08:58:10 PM EST

Marlowe REALLY needs to brief you better. :D - (Brandioch) - (45) - March 28, 2003, 09:59:22 PM EST

Re: Marlowe REALLY needs to brief you better. :D - (cybermace5) - (44) - March 28, 2003, 10:07:13 PM EST

I'll read that as "I was wrong". :D - (Brandioch) - (43) - March 28, 2003, 10:09:29 PM EST

Re: I'll read that as "I was wrong". :D - (cybermace5) - (42) - March 28, 2003, 10:17:44 PM EST

I'll read that as "I was wrong and I'm sorry". - (Brandioch) - (38) - March 28, 2003, 10:23:39 PM EST

Re: I'll read that as "I was wrong and I'm sorry". - (cybermace5) - (37) - March 28, 2003, 10:39:16 PM EST

That was a reference to a book. - (Brandioch) - (36) - March 28, 2003, 10:53:25 PM EST

Re: That was a reference to a book. - (cybermace5) - (35) - March 28, 2003, 10:58:53 PM EST

Get ABC news to post it, with references. - (Brandioch) - (34) - March 28, 2003, 11:10:56 PM EST

Re: Get ABC news to post it, with references. - (cybermace5) - (33) - March 28, 2003, 11:15:20 PM EST

They do rate higher in veracity than you do. - (Brandioch) - (32) - March 28, 2003, 11:22:30 PM EST

Re: They do rate higher in veracity than you do. - (cybermace5) - (31) - March 28, 2003, 11:56:21 PM EST

That's what I gave you. - (Brandioch) - (30) - March 28, 2003, 11:57:39 PM EST

Re: That's what I gave you. - (cybermace5) - (28) - March 29, 2003, 12:02:15 AM EST

Nice, you can't refute it so you'll dismiss it. :D - (Brandioch) - (27) - March 29, 2003, 12:02:56 AM EST

Re: Nice, you can't refute it so you'll dismiss it. :D - (cybermace5) - (26) - March 29, 2003, 12:06:45 AM EST

And I said that where? - (Brandioch) - (25) - March 29, 2003, 12:12:44 PM EST

Thanks for the free one. - (cybermace5) - (24) - March 29, 2003, 01:47:31 PM EST

And I deliver ANOTHER SMACKDOWN!!! - (Brandioch) - (23) - March 29, 2003, 03:05:03 PM EST

Directly upon yourself. - (cybermace5) - (20) - March 29, 2003, 03:31:15 PM EST

Interesting triage, given the context. - (Ashton) - (11) - March 29, 2003, 07:20:18 PM EST

Re: Interesting triage, given the context. - (cybermace5) - (10) - March 29, 2003, 07:43:32 PM EST

Re: Interesting triage, given the context. - (rcareaga) - (2) - March 29, 2003, 08:00:54 PM EST

Let us all hope no one brings out the worst. -NT - (cybermace5) - (1) - March 29, 2003, 08:26:38 PM EST

be afraid. be very afraid. -NT - (rcareaga) - March 29, 2003, 08:44:05 PM EST

Sorry, Bub - (Ashton) - (6) - March 29, 2003, 08:15:37 PM EST

Prose....HA! - (cybermace5) - (5) - March 29, 2003, 08:18:34 PM EST

Re: Prose....HA! - (rcareaga) - (4) - March 29, 2003, 08:23:53 PM EST

Re: Prose....HA! - (cybermace5) - (3) - March 29, 2003, 10:19:58 PM EST

What's with Marlowe and friends? - (Brandioch) - March 29, 2003, 11:38:27 PM EST

Hmmm - the W.. or E.. Coast menagerie? - (Ashton) - (1) - March 30, 2003, 02:43:13 AM EST

Neither. -NT - (cybermace5) - March 30, 2003, 02:49:33 AM EST

Oooh, ANOTHER SMACKDOWN! - (Brandioch) - (7) - March 29, 2003, 11:35:17 PM EST

Re: Oooh, ANOTHER SMACKDOWN! - (cybermace5) - (6) - March 30, 2003, 01:05:58 AM EST

And yet ANOTHER SMACKDOWN! - (Brandioch) - (5) - March 30, 2003, 01:58:15 AM EST

Re: And yet ANOTHER SMACKDOWN! - (cybermace5) - (4) - March 30, 2003, 02:47:34 AM EST

It is the feared QUADRUPAL SMACKDOWN! - (Brandioch) - (3) - March 30, 2003, 03:04:30 AM EST

It's spelled QUADRUPLE, and IDIOT!! - (cybermace5) - (2) - March 30, 2003, 03:08:36 AM EST

It's spelled QUINTUPLE! - (Brandioch) - (1) - March 30, 2003, 03:23:01 AM EST

Re: It's spelled QUINTUPLE! - (cybermace5) - March 30, 2003, 01:33:58 PM EST

Own Goal! -NT - (orion) - March 29, 2003, 04:43:00 PM EST

You shouldn't hit yourself so hard. -NT - (bepatient) - March 29, 2003, 04:47:20 PM EST

This is the part where.. - (bepatient) - March 29, 2003, 12:19:51 AM EST

I have no problem with calling it bullcrap - (dmarker) - (2) - March 28, 2003, 10:23:48 PM EST

Re: I have no problem with calling it bullcrap - (cybermace5) - (1) - March 28, 2003, 10:36:13 PM EST

Once again - quote the part that is bullcrap !!!! - (dmarker) - March 29, 2003, 07:09:20 AM EST

What do you expect? - (JayMehaffey) - (12) - March 28, 2003, 10:36:52 PM EST

Re: What do you expect? - (cybermace5) - (11) - March 28, 2003, 10:42:40 PM EST

Does "Niger" ring a bell? - (Brandioch) - (10) - March 28, 2003, 10:51:02 PM EST

Re: Does "Niger" ring a bell? - (cybermace5) - (9) - March 28, 2003, 11:03:19 PM EST

So our current regime is a bunch of idiots? - (Brandioch) - (3) - March 28, 2003, 11:08:19 PM EST

Re: So our current regime is a bunch of idiots? - (cybermace5) - (2) - March 28, 2003, 11:14:13 PM EST

You are wrong, again. - (Brandioch) - March 28, 2003, 11:24:54 PM EST

Side note. Brandi is right when he stresses the idiocy of - (boxley) - March 28, 2003, 11:32:09 PM EST

Re: Does "Niger" ring a bell? - (rcareaga) - (4) - March 29, 2003, 01:43:25 PM EST

Re: Does "Niger" ring a bell? - (cybermace5) - (1) - March 29, 2003, 01:02:47 PM EST

Translation: "I have trouble reading English." -NT - (Brandioch) - March 29, 2003, 03:05:52 PM EST

I'd also like to pose a personal attack. - (cybermace5) - (1) - March 29, 2003, 02:13:24 PM EST

**Yes!!** It **rings a bell!** -NT - (rcareaga) - March 29, 2003, 02:15:47 PM EST

iwethey.org

The only reason the bongos are the worst is because AIs have never tried chicken nuggets before.
64 ms