You skipped reading that article again, didn't you?

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #92,176 by Brandioch 3/27/03 11:16:51 AM Reply	You skipped reading that article again, didn't you?
Post #92,186 by boxley 3/27/03 11:54:52 AM Reply	yes, I read your quote and replied to that I then went to the article and nothing in the article suggested that 678 had been recinded. The quoted columnist ignored the point that 678 was incorporated in 1441 and nothing in 1441 rescinded 678. My comment stands. thanx, bill will work for cash and other incentives [link\|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html\|skill set] questions, help? [link\|mailto:pappas@catholic.org\|email pappas at catholic.org] Since corporations are the equivelent of human but they have no "concience" they are by definition sociopaths
Post #92,193 by Brandioch 3/27/03 12:20:55 PM Reply	Yep, I thought so. Again.

Illegal war? as in Illegal because congress didnt delare it - (boxley) - (27) - March 26, 2003, 08:59:18 PM EST

Yes, I am a citizen of the United States. - (mmoffitt) - (19) - March 26, 2003, 09:01:04 PM EST

fair enuff, thanx -NT - (boxley) - March 26, 2003, 09:02:06 PM EST

Speaking of which. - (ChrisR) - (6) - March 26, 2003, 09:07:32 PM EST

The French are better Americans than we are. - (mmoffitt) - (5) - March 26, 2003, 09:11:30 PM EST

D00d...relax -NT - (Simon_Jester) - (4) - March 26, 2003, 09:14:51 PM EST

RELAX - HELL! - (mmoffitt) - (3) - March 26, 2003, 09:17:36 PM EST

If you believe in Democracy (or even a Republic) - (Simon_Jester) - (2) - March 26, 2003, 09:45:15 PM EST

You know what bothers me about that? - (mmoffitt) - (1) - March 26, 2003, 09:50:09 PM EST

<chuckle> you do pick the good ones, don't you? - (Simon_Jester) - March 26, 2003, 09:53:44 PM EST

But, the US Congress gave Bush a blank check! - (a6l6e6x) - (10) - March 26, 2003, 09:09:36 PM EST

Understood. - (mmoffitt) - (8) - March 26, 2003, 09:12:26 PM EST

But... - (bepatient) - (7) - March 26, 2003, 09:30:01 PM EST

But... - (ChrisR) - (4) - March 26, 2003, 09:34:29 PM EST

Technically... - (cybermace5) - (3) - March 26, 2003, 10:28:27 PM EST

Correct me if I'm wrong... - (ChrisR) - (2) - March 26, 2003, 11:27:49 PM EST

Congress can't really declare a War anymore... - (gdaustin) - (1) - March 26, 2003, 11:41:50 PM EST

These Acts of War cover.... - (ChrisR) - March 26, 2003, 11:54:20 PM EST

Wrong. Congress cannot obsolve itself of its duty. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (1) - March 26, 2003, 09:36:13 PM EST

Im pro the war but On the legalities you are right - (boxley) - March 26, 2003, 09:41:48 PM EST

There's no blank check. Congress controls the checkbook. - (Another Scott) - March 26, 2003, 10:40:53 PM EST

Told you, you wanted 1441... - (Simon_Jester) - (1) - March 26, 2003, 09:28:55 PM EST

nothing in 1441 abrogated 678 - (boxley) - March 26, 2003, 09:40:08 PM EST

Been addressed already. - (Brandioch) - (4) - March 27, 2003, 10:29:34 AM EST

ROFL dont beleive the salesman, read the contract -NT - (boxley) - (3) - March 27, 2003, 10:57:56 AM EST

You skipped reading that article again, didn't you? -NT - (Brandioch) - (2) - March 27, 2003, 11:16:51 AM EST

yes, I read your quote and replied to that - (boxley) - (1) - March 27, 2003, 11:54:52 AM EST

Yep, I thought so. Again. -NT - (Brandioch) - March 27, 2003, 12:20:55 PM EST

Any more than we can resent a dog licking its own testicles.
72 ms