IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Re: That's a crock
It's called democracy

Well yes, that's what it's called. And boxley calls the bulldozed activist in Gaza a "terrorist."

The American system might better be called "duopoly," as you implicitly acknowledge in your post. Gore Vidal and others have suggested that the US arrangement is best understood as a single-party system (the "Property Party") with its two principal factions dressed up as separate entities for public consumption. That's as may be, but there are differences between the factions (which will continue indefinitely to maintain their position as the front entities for political participation here) that it's silly to deny, and the Naderites' contention that there was no meaningful distinction between the undistinguished candidates in 2000 has been amply disproved since to all save those who, like the sanctimonious Messrs Nader and Moore, are deeply in denial. What was Nader's vote in Florida? Something north of 97,000? A fifth of those--hell, a tenth of those in Gore's column--would have put the result out of reach of the hastily-improvised fraud and rent-a-mob measures undertaken by the junta-to-be.

cordially,

[edit: "in Gore's column"]
"Die Welt ist alles, was der Fall ist."
Collapse Edited by rcareaga March 26, 2003, 11:22:29 AM EST
Re: That's a crock
It's called democracy

Well yes, that's what it's called. And boxley calls the bulldozed activist in Gaza a "terrorist."

The American system might better be called "duopoly," as you implicitly acknowledge in your post. Gore Vidal and others have suggested that the US arrangement is best understood as a single-party system (the "Property Party") with its two principal factions dressed up as separate entities for public consumption. That's as may be, but there are differences between the factions (which will continue indefinitely to maintain their position as the front entities for political participation here) that it's silly to deny, and the Naderites' contention that there was no meaningful distinction between the undistinguished candidates in 2000 has been amply disproved since to all save those who, like the sanctimonious Messrs Nader and Moore, are deeply in denial. What was Nader's vote in Florida? Something north of 97,000? A fifth of those--hell, a tenth of those--would have put the result out of reach of the hastily-improvised fraud and rent-a-mob measures undertaken by the junta-to-be.

cordially,
"Die Welt ist alles, was der Fall ist."
     Michael Moore for President -NT - (andread) - (14)
         Not until he faces up... - (rcareaga) - (3)
             That's a crock - (jake123) - (1)
                 Re: That's a crock - (rcareaga)
             Not until he faces up - (boxley)
         No thanks. - (cwbrenn) - (9)
             Re: 2nd Amendment. - (mmoffitt) - (8)
                 No, *I* am. - (cwbrenn) - (7)
                     USSC: Miller, 1939. Cited often, never reversed. qed. - (mmoffitt) - (6)
                         Good for them - (cwbrenn) - (5)
                             Yes, and you're free to disagree with The Constitution. :-) - (mmoffitt) - (4)
                                 ... - (cwbrenn) - (1)
                                     I don't think we need another day, but thanks. - (mmoffitt)
                                 Sheesh. /me is dumb - (cwbrenn) - (1)
                                     Me 2! Apologies! -NT - (mmoffitt)

Such twisted irony.
111 ms