IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Why?
I think he's low by a factor of 3x to 5x if chem/bio weapons are used, but we're in the fight now and we have to win.
Why do "we have to win"?
New Because
Why do "we have to win"?

Because we have so little goodwill left in the rest of the world that our survival will henceforth be founded on intimidation, which will be seriously impaired if we are perceived to be "defeated." Because the junta could not politically survive it (they might not survive the tarbaby-to-be, but if our "Coalition of the Kicking and Screaming" withdraws from Iraq with its existing government remaining intact, it will require some superhuman spinmeistering to make the next election even close, which condition will be required if they are to have a prayer of stealing it).

cordially,
"Die Welt ist alles, was der Fall ist."
New I agree there
This war was started by a few incredibly stupid and incredibly arrogant men on both sides, for their own agrandisment and profit.

The U.S. is now backed into a corner with nowhere to turn. We must win this war, in a short time and with minimal casualties.

This leaves responsible citizens with the difficult task of supporting our troops in Iraq, while working to tear our own "leadership" out by the roots and bury it in a toxic waste dump.
[link|http://www.aaxnet.com|AAx]
Expand Edited by Andrew Grygus March 25, 2003, 12:11:38 PM EST
New Well Said, I agree
-drl
New unfair!
while working to tear our own "leadership" out by the roots and bury it in a toxic waste dump

A base libel on toxic waste dumps everywhere.

cordially,

"Die Welt ist alles, was der Fall ist."
New Well said - mature opinions regin again

Anyone notice that there is a big difference between those posters who have the experience and insight to test what we are told and then agree/disagree with those less experienced & with little insights who are only able to take what others say & either support it or oppose it without any real ability to question it.

This seems to me to be where a big gap exists between two general groups of posters that have emerged here. I think there is an age & world experience gap showing.

Cheers

Doug Marker


Spectres from our past: Beware the future when your children & theirs come after you for what you may have been willing to condone today - dsm 2003


Motivational: When performing activities, ask yourself if the person you most want to be would do, or say, it - dsm 2003
New Where do you draw the line, gramps? :-)
New <vbg> entirely beneath the maturity & insights of the poster

that is worldexperience & 'age'

(like a good wine)

Cheers

Gramps (still haven't got to NZ yet to see Miss 11 & Master 12)


Spectres from our past: Beware the future when your children & theirs come after you for what you may have been willing to condone today - dsm 2003


Motivational: When performing activities, ask yourself if the person you most want to be would do, or say, it - dsm 2003
New Oh. Okay. :)
New Why we have to win?
Because there's a good possibility that a loss would result in oil prices skyrocketing, markets significantly contracting, unemployment getting much worse,....

But then that's a major backdrop of why we're going in there in the first place.
     The effect of casualties on American morale - (marlowe) - (14)
         This is the easy part. - (Brandioch) - (13)
             Not in the briefing, But - (gdaustin) - (12)
                 Why? - (Brandioch) - (9)
                     Because - (rcareaga) - (7)
                         I agree there - (Andrew Grygus) - (5)
                             Well Said, I agree -NT - (deSitter)
                             unfair! - (rcareaga)
                             Well said - mature opinions regin again - (dmarker) - (2)
                                 Where do you draw the line, gramps? :-) -NT - (inthane-chan) - (1)
                                     <vbg> entirely beneath the maturity & insights of the poster - (dmarker)
                         Oh. Okay. :) -NT - (Brandioch)
                     Why we have to win? - (ChrisR)
                 I think he's low period - (jake123)
                 right, thats why they shipped 10k body bags out of macdill - (boxley)

How much more correcter could this phrase get? None more correcter.
120 ms