Tossing nukes left and right

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #91,305 by orion 3/25/03 6:27:26 AM Reply	Tossing nukes left and right no he wouldn't, then there wouldn't be a USA to save anymore, just a nuclear wasteland. Which is why you don't toss nukes on your native soil. Saddam didn't have a chance to put his payloads into those extended-range SCUDs, which go beyond the 93 mile mark set by resolution 678. "Bill gates cannot guarantee Windows, so how are you going to guarantee my safety?" -John Crichton to the Emperor of the Scarrans on [link\|http://www.farscape.com\|FarScape]
Post #91,314 by bluke 3/25/03 7:57:37 AM Reply	No comparison between nukes and chemical weapons There is no defense against a nuclear weapon, period, if a nuke is dropped nearby you are dead. Chemical weapons on the hand are easily defenced and are nowhere near as effective.
Post #91,332 by Brandioch 3/25/03 9:32:33 AM Reply	The only proof is prediction. Saddam didn't have a chance to put his payloads into those extended-range SCUDs, which go beyond the 93 mile mark set by resolution 678. Why didn't he? He didn't know about the US build-up? It was on CNN. Everyone else in the WORLD knew about it. He didn't know when we'd strike? Bush gave him 48 hours. The entire WORLD heard that. And so forth. Yet Saddam is sooooo smart that he can hide those production facilities but sooooooo stupid that he can't watch CNN. You see, I can easily be convinced that I was wrong. All Saddam has to do is use a nuke/chem/bio weapon. You, on the other hand, will NEVER be wrong. Because YOU will ALWAYS try to excuse your errors. Then you'll try to excuse the Iraqi children that have died because of your support for a war based upon lies. But that's okay. They probably wanted to be killed.
Post #91,443 by rcareaga 3/25/03 3:12:03 PM Reply	Re: Tossing nukes left and right Norman, please don't interrupt when the grownups are talking. cordially, "Die Welt ist alles, was der Fall ist."

Why havn't they used them yet? - (JayMehaffey) - (27) - March 23, 2003, 11:22:31 PM EST

whatever works :-) -NT - (boxley) - March 23, 2003, 11:24:00 PM EST

*boggle* - (Brandioch) - (1) - March 23, 2003, 11:28:54 PM EST

So you say...over and over and over -NT - (bepatient) - March 23, 2003, 11:53:01 PM EST

You guys are using the wrong criteria - (bluke) - (23) - March 24, 2003, 03:05:26 AM EST

Wanna place a bet of this ??? - my $US100 - (dmarker) - (22) - March 24, 2003, 03:42:20 AM EST

No deal for a simple reason - (bluke) - (21) - March 24, 2003, 04:00:11 AM EST

So Saddam will not use "WMD's"..... - (Brandioch) - (20) - March 24, 2003, 09:26:33 AM EST

What don't you understand ... - (bluke) - (19) - March 24, 2003, 09:50:22 AM EST

backtracking like all getout - (rcareaga) - (2) - March 24, 2003, 10:31:30 AM EST

Re: backtracking like all getout - (cybermace5) - (1) - March 24, 2003, 10:33:50 AM EST

Not sure what that has to do with offer odf bet ??? - (dmarker) - March 24, 2003, 06:05:25 PM EST

That was the whole point. - (Brandioch) - (15) - March 24, 2003, 10:33:08 AM EST

Aint it amazing - call these cats bluff & they meow loudly - (dmarker) - (7) - March 24, 2003, 06:47:51 PM EST

Re: Aint it amazing - call these cats bluff & they meow loud - (cybermace5) - (6) - March 24, 2003, 07:02:38 PM EST

So is that a take up of the bet or another meow ? -NT - (dmarker) - (5) - March 25, 2003, 07:17:51 AM EST

Re: So is that a take up of the bet or another meow ? - (cybermace5) - (4) - March 25, 2003, 10:11:17 AM EST

Easy money - (rcareaga) - (3) - March 25, 2003, 12:22:46 PM EST

Re: Easy money - (cybermace5) - (2) - March 25, 2003, 02:09:01 PM EST

The diff between those who analyse & those who swallow - (dmarker) - (1) - March 25, 2003, 09:16:53 PM EST

gawd can't resist - (deSitter) - March 25, 2003, 09:22:31 PM EST

How effective would Chemical weapons be against US troops? - (bluke) - (2) - March 25, 2003, 03:41:17 AM EST

Desert heat is coming - (Ashton) - (1) - March 25, 2003, 05:09:40 AM EST

Not for at least a few weeks - (bluke) - March 25, 2003, 05:53:15 AM EST

Tossing nukes left and right - (orion) - (3) - March 25, 2003, 06:27:26 AM EST

No comparison between nukes and chemical weapons - (bluke) - March 25, 2003, 07:57:37 AM EST

The only proof is prediction. - (Brandioch) - March 25, 2003, 09:32:33 AM EST

Re: Tossing nukes left and right - (rcareaga) - March 25, 2003, 03:12:03 PM EST

Jung would have wanted it this way.
51 ms