absolute horse sh*t

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #91,241

by boxley

3/24/03 10:16:21 PM

absolute horse sh*t

The only reason America didnt completely roll the VC and the NVA was "rules of engagement" There was plenty of troops and supplies to do the job but the chronics at home and in the joint chiefs didnt want to engage thoroughly.
Guerrella war can be sucessfully fought. In Rhodesia without the boycott of the world it would still be there. Tibet is still run by china. The Ukraine after WW2 was pacified by the Russians by 1955. It takes all out effort and no morals but it can be done.
thanx,
bill

will work for cash and other incentives [link|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html|skill set]

questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]

To a lot of people in California hunting anything but the wild tofualope was equivelent to sacarificing babies to satan. S.M. Stirling

Post #91,277

by rcareaga

3/25/03 12:21:51 AM

boxley brings us truth in labeling!

"absolute horsehit" describes the premise of the referenced post, that the US could have prevailed in Vietnam, eloquently and economically. An American "victory" in 2003 would resemble (A) the surface of the moon, or (B) Vietnam 1969, with urban centers and "strategic hamlets" under nominal government control by day, and the nights and the countryside in firm possession of the resistance; hundreds of thousands of US troops in occupation and the bars & bordellos of Saigon roaring along. The Vietnamese (still provisioned by China and, in all likelihood, a still-intact USSR) were never going to give up and go home for the simple reason that they were home already.

cordially,

"Die Welt ist alles, was der Fall ist."

Bingo... - (gdaustin) - (59) - March 23, 2003, 09:11:06 PM EST

ROFLMAO! - (mmoffitt) - (15) - March 23, 2003, 09:14:48 PM EST

we might well find legit sh*t, we havnt found it yet -NT - (boxley) - (14) - March 23, 2003, 09:17:34 PM EST

We stood a better chance with inspectors. - (mmoffitt) - (13) - March 23, 2003, 09:24:49 PM EST

Re: We stood a better chance with inspectors. - (cybermace5) - (12) - March 23, 2003, 09:39:42 PM EST

Nice lampoon. - (jake123) - (1) - March 23, 2003, 09:40:45 PM EST

Re: Nice lampoon. - (cybermace5) - March 23, 2003, 09:42:39 PM EST

Reasoned rebuttal. - (jake123) - (1) - March 23, 2003, 10:00:52 PM EST

Re: Reasoned rebuttal. - (cybermace5) - March 23, 2003, 10:53:18 PM EST

Re: We stood a better chance with inspectors. - (dmarker) - (7) - March 23, 2003, 10:05:00 PM EST

Another of Marlowe's friends from school? - (Brandioch) - (6) - March 23, 2003, 10:26:20 PM EST

Re: Another of Marlowe's friends from school? - (cybermace5) - (5) - March 23, 2003, 10:59:04 PM EST

Yep, another of his high school friends. - (Brandioch) - (1) - March 23, 2003, 11:25:24 PM EST

Exactly, you finally are kind of getting it... - (screamer) - March 24, 2003, 10:41:24 AM EST

Saddam's not dead - (jake123) - (2) - March 23, 2003, 11:53:30 PM EST

which sadaam, there is several you know -NT - (boxley) - (1) - March 23, 2003, 11:58:50 PM EST

One Dubya is one Dubya too many <grin> -NT - (dmarker) - March 24, 2003, 01:42:30 AM EST

It was not immediately clear what chemicals were being - (boxley) - (3) - March 23, 2003, 09:16:39 PM EST

Not sure what legit chemical factory would need... - (admin) - (2) - March 23, 2003, 09:21:10 PM EST

US has been bombing Iraq since Gulf War 1 - (jake123) - (1) - March 23, 2003, 09:24:43 PM EST

I'll accept that... - (admin) - March 23, 2003, 09:47:53 PM EST

So why haven't they used any yet? -NT - (Brandioch) - (37) - March 23, 2003, 10:04:55 PM EST

bingo...maybe not - (rcareaga) - (36) - March 23, 2003, 10:56:44 PM EST

I like this quote. - (Brandioch) - (35) - March 23, 2003, 11:40:57 PM EST

Re: I like this quote. - (cybermace5) - (34) - March 24, 2003, 12:50:09 AM EST

Marlowe should have briefed you better. - (Brandioch) - (33) - March 24, 2003, 09:23:10 AM EST

Re: Marlowe should have briefed you better. - (cybermace5) - (32) - March 24, 2003, 09:57:36 AM EST

It's better to leave live agents with the enemy? - (Brandioch) - (31) - March 24, 2003, 10:47:50 AM EST

And more. - (Brandioch) - (1) - March 24, 2003, 10:52:58 AM EST

Re: And more. - (cybermace5) - March 24, 2003, 02:45:46 PM EST

Re: It's better to leave live agents with the enemy? - (cybermace5) - (28) - March 24, 2003, 11:06:56 AM EST

So, you pile excuse on excuse on excuse? - (Brandioch) - (27) - March 24, 2003, 12:34:34 PM EST

Re: So, you pile excuse on excuse on excuse? - (cybermace5) - (26) - March 24, 2003, 01:17:02 PM EST

Vietnam - (Brandioch) - (24) - March 24, 2003, 01:35:42 PM EST

Big difference - (cybermace5) - (23) - March 24, 2003, 02:42:18 PM EST

Parallels... - (ChrisR) - (4) - March 24, 2003, 02:59:39 PM EST

And one other thought... - (ChrisR) - (2) - March 24, 2003, 03:12:37 PM EST

And another... - (ChrisR) - (1) - March 24, 2003, 03:20:21 PM EST

+10 for insight. - (Brandioch) - March 24, 2003, 03:32:17 PM EST

Re: Parallels... - (deSitter) - March 24, 2003, 03:23:04 PM EST

How many WOULD have been sufficient? - (Brandioch) - (15) - March 24, 2003, 03:21:41 PM EST

The biggest difference.... - (ChrisR) - (3) - March 24, 2003, 03:31:14 PM EST

:) But if no one watches it on TV, does it matter? - (Brandioch) - (2) - March 24, 2003, 03:56:33 PM EST

Afghanistan has been a good theatre for us. - (ChrisR) - (1) - March 24, 2003, 04:34:53 PM EST

My problem with Afghanistan is..... - (Brandioch) - March 24, 2003, 04:56:47 PM EST

Re: How many WOULD have been sufficient? - (cybermace5) - (10) - March 24, 2003, 03:33:50 PM EST

And you add ANOTHER layer of excuses. - (Brandioch) - (9) - March 24, 2003, 04:08:33 PM EST

Re: And you add ANOTHER layer of excuses. - (cybermace5) - (8) - March 24, 2003, 04:22:40 PM EST

Like I said, another layer of excuses. - (Brandioch) - (2) - March 24, 2003, 04:33:12 PM EST

Re: Like I said, another layer of excuses. - (cybermace5) - (1) - March 24, 2003, 04:55:27 PM EST

And even more excuses from you. - (Brandioch) - March 24, 2003, 05:40:01 PM EST

Re: And you add ANOTHER layer of excuses. - (jake123) - (4) - March 24, 2003, 05:05:55 PM EST

the 4th Estate is heard (or not, as may be) - (rcareaga) - March 24, 2003, 05:27:17 PM EST

Re: And you add ANOTHER layer of excuses. - (cybermace5) - (2) - March 24, 2003, 05:38:18 PM EST

Hey, that's my prediction - (jake123) - March 24, 2003, 05:47:23 PM EST

That is because you do not understand. - (Brandioch) - March 24, 2003, 05:50:07 PM EST

absolute horse sh*t - (boxley) - (1) - March 24, 2003, 10:16:21 PM EST

boxley brings us truth in labeling! - (rcareaga) - March 25, 2003, 12:21:51 AM EST

welcome to khassim :0 -NT - (boxley) - March 24, 2003, 10:10:11 PM EST

The only proof is prediction. - (Brandioch) - March 25, 2003, 05:33:00 PM EST

iwethey.org

Why do you hate 16 ton weights?
127 ms