Different situation
At the same time, trying to draw too many parallels between the two conflicts can also mislead. One: that was ten years ago... after being pasted that heavily, do you think they really sat on their hands and did nothing to improve their equipment? Two: the US forces are in unfriendly territory; last time 'round, most people in the countryside they were fighting in were on their side, this time they're not. Three: part of the Russian report was that the US group was caught completely by surprise; they were north of Basra and pointing south when the Iraqi column came at them from the north. Also, this particular group were infantry, not cavalry. Possibly the Iraqis now have DU munitions (the US had them and Iraq didn't in '91) which could be the great equaliser in tank battles this time around. The Russian site claims that they got caught in a pincer movement, which is one of the most tactically devastatingly bad places to be, and are at risk of being cut off from the main body of the US/UK forces.
They are claiming that most of the information they are using is coming from the GRU, and is based on assets in the area and satellite reconaissance.
--\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton jake at consultron.ca *\n* [link|http://consultron.ca|http://consultron.ca] [link|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] *\n* Kingston Ontario Canada [link|news://news.consultron.ca|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------