Post #90,343
3/22/03 9:31:39 AM
|
But stuff will be found.
Did ya hear about the secret $600 million bid for "rebuilding" Iraq? Showed some of what the money was to be used for, but significantly, said some things were marked secret.
Of course. Can't advertise that we need to build and plant Iraq WMDs as proof that existed.
Oh, Halliburton (sp) was one of the seven, huge republican contributors, companies who were allowed to bid.
[link|mailto:jbrabeck@attbi.com|Joe]
|
Post #90,348
3/22/03 9:48:47 AM
|
Exactly.
|
Post #90,351
3/22/03 9:57:01 AM
|
Oooh...thats some secret.
Halliburton builds oil wells and infrastructure.
Big secret.
Or do you think we're gonna go in and say..."See that oil loading faciility?!? Its a weapon of mass destruction!"
Keep hunting for that conspiricy. Its entertaining.
If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. Fudd's First Law of Opposition
[link|mailto:bepatient@aol.com|BePatient]
|
Post #90,353
3/22/03 10:11:56 AM
|
They'll just subcontract out the WMD portion.
All that is needed is a bunch of remanents. Build a few warheads. Add trace chemicals, blow them apart, plant as necessary.
[link|mailto:jbrabeck@attbi.com|Joe]
|
Post #90,355
3/22/03 10:13:47 AM
3/22/03 12:26:30 PM
|
Riiiiight
If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. Fudd's First Law of Opposition
[link|mailto:bepatient@aol.com|BePatient]
Keep hunting for that conspiricy. It makes life on the "planet" that much more bearable.
Edited by bepatient
March 22, 2003, 12:26:30 PM EST
|
Post #90,389
3/22/03 12:31:54 PM
|
Manufactured evidence
is nothing new in war situations. Whether it be via Halliburton or some other means, I have little doubt that evidence will be found, even if it has to be imported into Iraq.
Another way to put it is that now we'll never know, because there's no way we'll ever be able to find out if anything found was legitimate or manufactured.
And Beep, whatever else you can say, you can't say it hasn't been done before. By the US, no less, though of course they are far from unique in having done so in the past.
--\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton jake at consultron.ca *\n* [link|http://consultron.ca|http://consultron.ca] [link|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] *\n* Kingston Ontario Canada [link|news://news.consultron.ca|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------
|
Post #90,392
3/22/03 1:18:31 PM
|
And I'm sure...
...that we'll leave all of that cover-up to an independent oil equipment and services company.
Once again...
Riiight!
I have no doubt that in the past and in the future there will be "manufactured" evidence.
I'll at least give us a little more credit on picking the manufacturer.
If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. Fudd's First Law of Opposition
[link|mailto:bepatient@aol.com|BePatient]
|
Post #90,394
3/22/03 1:23:17 PM
|
No, I don't think the company will do it
But it's probably a great way to launder the money involved in doing it.
--\r\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\r\n* Jack Troughton jake at consultron.ca *\r\n* [link|http://consultron.ca|http://consultron.ca] [link|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] *\r\n* Kingston Ontario Canada [link|news://news.consultron.ca|news://news.consultron.ca] *\r\n-------------------------------------------------------------------
|
Post #90,359
3/22/03 10:26:35 AM
|
Put it this way.
If we do NOT "find" SOMETHING, everyone in the WORLD will know that Iraq wasn't the threat the Bush claimed.
Which makes this "war" illegal.
Now, if Saddam DID have what Bush claimed, why wasn't it used?
|
