IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New My analogy does not fail...
...your reading of the text has failed...

Too bad... I indeed feel sorry for your wife. I can see that you don't have a logical mind when it come to understanding examples... you, you just take them literally.
b4k4^2
[link|mailto:curley95@attbi.com|greg] - Grand-Master Artist in IT
[link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry/|REMEMBER ED CURRY!]   [link|http://pascal.rockford.com:8888/SSK@kQMsmc74S0Tw3KHQiRQmDem0gAIPAgM/edcurry/1//|ED'S GHOST SPEAKS!]
[link|http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,857673,00.asp|Writing on wall, Microsoft to develop apps for Linux by 2004]
Heimatland Geheime Staatspolizei reminds:
These [link|http://www.whitehouse.gov/pcipb/cyberspace_strategy.pdf|Civilian General Orders], please memorize them.
"Questions" will be asked at safety checkpoints.
New Your analogies failed. I'm NOT married.
Too bad... I indeed feel sorry for your wife. I can see that you don't have a logical mind when it come to understanding examples... you, you just take them literally.
No, I was showing where your analogies failed.

I even numbered them and showed you where they were inaccurate.

Your "justification" depends upon a false dichotomy.

Either we invade Iraq NOW
-or-
We withdraw the inspectors and remove the sanctions and do nothing at all.

I pointed out that this was flawed because the options are NOT

INVADE
-or-
Do nothing

There are LOTS of options that do NOT require an invasion.

Just as you didn't understand that a "Weapon of Mass Destruction" was NOT the same as a rocket.
     Hmmm... portrail and justification - (folkert) - (31)
         That hasn't been shown yet... - (admin) - (30)
             It should also be pointed out - (jake123) - (29)
                 Except - (admin)
                 Agreed... - (folkert) - (27)
                     Sarcasm aside - (jake123) - (4)
                         I'm not sure what points you are addressing... - (admin) - (1)
                             Sorry, I'm probably coming on a bit strong - (jake123)
                         But ... SCUDS? - (folkert) - (1)
                             Re: homes - (jake123)
                     That's why I find euphemisms so disgusting. - (Brandioch) - (21)
                         BUT 12 EFFING YEARS? - (folkert) - (20)
                             Re: BUT 12 EFFING YEARS? - (deSitter) - (11)
                                 Okay how long? When to draw the line? -NT - (folkert) - (10)
                                     Re: Okay how long? When to draw the line? - (deSitter) - (4)
                                         Yep. I like that too... BUT... - (folkert) - (3)
                                             Re: Yep. I like that too... BUT... - (deSitter) - (1)
                                                 Nope... - (folkert)
                                             ..also.. - (deSitter)
                                     When he attacks another country. - (Brandioch) - (4)
                                         Okay... - (folkert) - (3)
                                             Your analogy fails. - (Brandioch) - (2)
                                                 My analogy does not fail... - (folkert) - (1)
                                                     Your analogies failed. I'm NOT married. - (Brandioch)
                             I assume then that for 12 years you have been shouting this? - (Silverlock) - (1)
                                 I haven't been as overt about this aspect... - (folkert)
                             Why not? He has NOT attacked any other country. - (Brandioch) - (5)
                                 True... - (folkert) - (4)
                                     You claim we are raising Iraq? - (Brandioch) - (2)
                                         We help them when ... - (folkert) - (1)
                                             "We help them when ... it is against our beliefs..." - (Brandioch)
                                     Re: True... - (jake123)

At least as intelligible as your X-Man666.JPG monologues.
137 ms