Post #89,785
3/20/03 1:15:36 PM
|
BUT 12 EFFING YEARS?
12 years... so would you give him another 12 years?
Why not 50 years... shoot why not wait untill we all die... then it isn't our problem at all.
When or where are you going to draw the line.
Treat your kids like this... and you get kids that will not follow your directions. Raise them for 12 years like that from being a baby... hellion on wheels in the teens (which is 1 year away)
Blah Blah Blah... if you can honestly say he was 100% helpful in inspecting... then why even inspect. He has already given up all the WMD he has then.
If you CANNOT say was 100% helpful in inspections... when do we make that deadline? 12 years... And you want 2-3 more months... he is showing more... but then that means he HASN'T complied... the deliver mechanisms with ranges greater than ??? distance are also included in the disarm resolutions... yet he still uses them... today even.
Are we clear yet as to why 12 years hasn't been LONG enough... or HAS it been long enough... How much longer do we need for him to comply? Wait, complying means he doesn;t have any of the excluded weapons (of MD or not) the UN has decreed. Why does he still dangle the carrot... by giving the inspectors 1 or 2 more pieces... progress... why after 12 years does he decide...
He decides mainly because there is a serious force of troops looking like they are gonna kick his ass... wouldn't you? But he still hasn't proven he has complied... only stated it. Oil wells burning presumably at the hands of the military... yet Saddam stated he would NEVER destroy the *ROYAL* Riches... like Oil wells owned by Iraq... Lies... Lies... Lies... yeah...
b4k4^2
| [link|mailto:curley95@attbi.com|greg] - Grand-Master Artist in IT | | [link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry/|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] [link|http://pascal.rockford.com:8888/SSK@kQMsmc74S0Tw3KHQiRQmDem0gAIPAgM/edcurry/1//|ED'S GHOST SPEAKS!] | | [link|http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,857673,00.asp|Writing on wall, Microsoft to develop apps for Linux by 2004] | Heimatland Geheime Staatspolizei reminds:
These [link|http://www.whitehouse.gov/pcipb/cyberspace_strategy.pdf|Civilian General Orders], please memorize them.
"Questions" will be asked at safety checkpoints. |
|
Post #89,789
3/20/03 1:25:55 PM
|
Re: BUT 12 EFFING YEARS?
We could have worked it out in the UN. It's our arrogance and stupidity that are the economy-destroying, suicidal factors here.
Saddam was not the issue. The cooperation of nations is the issue. The US used to stand for something - now we are no better than Russia sitting on Chechnya, China on Tibet, or Israel on Palestine.
-drl
|
Post #89,790
3/20/03 1:26:57 PM
|
Okay how long? When to draw the line?
b4k4^2
| [link|mailto:curley95@attbi.com|greg] - Grand-Master Artist in IT | | [link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry/|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] [link|http://pascal.rockford.com:8888/SSK@kQMsmc74S0Tw3KHQiRQmDem0gAIPAgM/edcurry/1//|ED'S GHOST SPEAKS!] | | [link|http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,857673,00.asp|Writing on wall, Microsoft to develop apps for Linux by 2004] | Heimatland Geheime Staatspolizei reminds:
These [link|http://www.whitehouse.gov/pcipb/cyberspace_strategy.pdf|Civilian General Orders], please memorize them.
"Questions" will be asked at safety checkpoints. |
|
Post #89,791
3/20/03 1:28:24 PM
|
Re: Okay how long? When to draw the line?
Like a good neighbor, husband, friend, classmate, hospital roomie, you work things out. It's simple deceny and civilized behavior.
-drl
|
Post #89,794
3/20/03 1:41:55 PM
|
Yep. I like that too... BUT...
Saddam wasn't co-operating... the others were not seeing that 12 years was an inordinate amount of time...
The UN is in-effective as of 2130 EST March 19, 2003. They can't even agree to disagree and move along on *A* path... some of the members don't even care *WHAT* is going on... *IN* Iraq.
That time and date was the beginning of the end of the UN. Some may argue it was in 1998.
Pretty soon, it'll be "good" ole colonialism setting in...
If you think it wasn't about Saddam it wasn't... it is about UN not being able to resolve anything and enforce it.
b4k4^2
| [link|mailto:curley95@attbi.com|greg] - Grand-Master Artist in IT | | [link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry/|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] [link|http://pascal.rockford.com:8888/SSK@kQMsmc74S0Tw3KHQiRQmDem0gAIPAgM/edcurry/1//|ED'S GHOST SPEAKS!] | | [link|http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,857673,00.asp|Writing on wall, Microsoft to develop apps for Linux by 2004] | Heimatland Geheime Staatspolizei reminds:
These [link|http://www.whitehouse.gov/pcipb/cyberspace_strategy.pdf|Civilian General Orders], please memorize them.
"Questions" will be asked at safety checkpoints. |
|
Post #89,795
3/20/03 1:43:46 PM
|
Re: Yep. I like that too... BUT...
No one likes Saddam - no one, not the French, Russians, Chinese, East Timorese, Ivory Coastians, Senegalese, Tuvans.
It could have been worked out.
We suck.
-drl
|
Post #89,803
3/20/03 1:51:48 PM
|
Nope...
When in the course of human events... has there EVER been an agreement to go to War?
Let's see... WWII... it *US* getting attacked by a third party to get us to connect...
Let's see... WWI... similar.
When France and Germany get Terrorist attack at them on the scale and magnitude we did... heck even Uzbehcistan(sp) knows how badly coutries cannot get along...
Unfortuneately WE will be able to take care of the problem before they would have gotten "involved"... it's ashame.
b4k4^2
| [link|mailto:curley95@attbi.com|greg] - Grand-Master Artist in IT | | [link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry/|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] [link|http://pascal.rockford.com:8888/SSK@kQMsmc74S0Tw3KHQiRQmDem0gAIPAgM/edcurry/1//|ED'S GHOST SPEAKS!] | | [link|http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,857673,00.asp|Writing on wall, Microsoft to develop apps for Linux by 2004] | Heimatland Geheime Staatspolizei reminds:
These [link|http://www.whitehouse.gov/pcipb/cyberspace_strategy.pdf|Civilian General Orders], please memorize them.
"Questions" will be asked at safety checkpoints. |
|
Post #89,797
3/20/03 1:47:09 PM
3/20/03 1:47:30 PM
|
..also..
Here's an answer for you - how we fucked even Blair:
[link|http://www.accessatlanta.com/ajc/opinion/bookman/|http://www.accessatl.../opinion/bookman/]
-drl
Edited by deSitter
March 20, 2003, 01:47:30 PM EST
|
Post #89,815
3/20/03 2:39:49 PM
|
When he attacks another country.
Until that point is reached, we act like civilized adults.
|
Post #89,822
3/20/03 2:55:30 PM
|
Okay...
So when the Police tell you that they cannot do anything about your Missing Daughter for 72 hours... YOU act like a civilized Adult, right?
Or you see a Timer counting down through your window in the Garage next door... and also see 2 Tons of Explosives there... You call the police and they say they cannot do anything about it until they have probable cause... You of course act like a civized adult. The bomb then goes off... destroying your house and two blocks around.
You see a guy brandishing a Squad Automatic Weapon with belts of ammo strapped to him on his porch... with a determined look on his face... You call the police... they say he has a Permit fo the weapon... but won't do anything untill *SOMETHING* happens... Did I mention this person JUST HAPPENS to live next to you... You act like a civilized adult. He then attacks and kills your wife because she came home and happen to drive in front of his house...
I can come up many more situations where the circumstances are the same...
b4k4^2
| [link|mailto:curley95@attbi.com|greg] - Grand-Master Artist in IT | | [link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry/|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] [link|http://pascal.rockford.com:8888/SSK@kQMsmc74S0Tw3KHQiRQmDem0gAIPAgM/edcurry/1//|ED'S GHOST SPEAKS!] | | [link|http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,857673,00.asp|Writing on wall, Microsoft to develop apps for Linux by 2004] | Heimatland Geheime Staatspolizei reminds:
These [link|http://www.whitehouse.gov/pcipb/cyberspace_strategy.pdf|Civilian General Orders], please memorize them.
"Questions" will be asked at safety checkpoints. |
|
Post #89,827
3/20/03 3:13:47 PM
|
Your analogy fails.
So when the Police tell you that they cannot do anything about your Missing Daughter for 72 hours... YOU act like a civilized Adult, right? So...... Police == UN (I think) Missing Daughter == what? 72 hours == more time for inspections? Or you see a Timer counting down through your window in the Garage next door... and also see 2 Tons of Explosives there... Okay, if someone puts explosives on my house, that is an attack. Saddam has NOT attacked any other country in the past 12 years. When he DOES, we can invade. You see a guy brandishing a Squad Automatic Weapon with belts of ammo strapped to him on his porch... with a determined look on his face... You call the police... they say he has a Permit fo the weapon... but won't do anything untill *SOMETHING* happens... Did I mention this person JUST HAPPENS to live next to you... You act like a civilized adult. He then attacks and kills your wife because she came home and happen to drive in front of his house... Where do YOU live? If the guy next door HAS such a weapon... LEGALLY Okay, Saddam is LEGALLY allowed (by the UN) to stockpile automatic weapons and ammo and grenades and rockets. He is NOT allowed to have nukes or chem-bio weapons. It has NOT been shown that he has those. I can come up many more situations where the circumstances are the same... Maybe to you they are the same. You're all over the place in your analogies. #1. Missing Daughter, are you suggesting that I start shooting up the neighborhood until someone tells me where she is? #2. Explosives and timer, this is an illegal act, committed by someone who has crossed my property line. This would be the same as if Saddam had invaded Kuwait. And what did we do then? #3. Legally owned weapon but owner is behaving erratically in public. This would be the same as if Saddam had organized his troops on the border of a nation that was NOT threatening him. In which case, the threatened nation would, logically, dig in its troops to provide maximum defense in case of attack. And I would call my wife and tell her to NOT come home 'cause the neighbor went crazy and I would join her at a hotel downtown. If he shoots up the house, I get the insurance money and he gets years in jail. If I arrange it correctly, I'd even get HIS house as part of the settlement.
|
Post #89,842
3/20/03 4:41:03 PM
|
My analogy does not fail...
...your reading of the text has failed...
Too bad... I indeed feel sorry for your wife. I can see that you don't have a logical mind when it come to understanding examples... you, you just take them literally.
b4k4^2
| [link|mailto:curley95@attbi.com|greg] - Grand-Master Artist in IT | | [link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry/|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] [link|http://pascal.rockford.com:8888/SSK@kQMsmc74S0Tw3KHQiRQmDem0gAIPAgM/edcurry/1//|ED'S GHOST SPEAKS!] | | [link|http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,857673,00.asp|Writing on wall, Microsoft to develop apps for Linux by 2004] | Heimatland Geheime Staatspolizei reminds:
These [link|http://www.whitehouse.gov/pcipb/cyberspace_strategy.pdf|Civilian General Orders], please memorize them.
"Questions" will be asked at safety checkpoints. |
|
Post #89,846
3/20/03 4:48:24 PM
|
Your analogies failed. I'm NOT married.
Too bad... I indeed feel sorry for your wife. I can see that you don't have a logical mind when it come to understanding examples... you, you just take them literally. No, I was showing where your analogies failed. I even numbered them and showed you where they were inaccurate. Your "justification" depends upon a false dichotomy. Either we invade Iraq NOW -or- We withdraw the inspectors and remove the sanctions and do nothing at all. I pointed out that this was flawed because the options are NOT INVADE -or- Do nothing There are LOTS of options that do NOT require an invasion. Just as you didn't understand that a "Weapon of Mass Destruction" was NOT the same as a rocket.
|
Post #89,808
3/20/03 2:12:34 PM
|
I assume then that for 12 years you have been shouting this?
No? Then why is it so important now? Our government has consistently been lying to us on this topic. As a man with access to information not generally available to the public, Rep. Ron Paul in remarks opposing the handing over of the power to declare war to the executive branch states Mr. Speaker, for the more than one dozen years I have spent as a federal legislator I have taken a particular interest in foreign affairs and especially the politics of the Middle East. From my seat on the international relations committee I have had the opportunity to review dozens of documents and to sit through numerous hearings and mark-up sessions regarding the issues of both Iraq and international terrorism.
Back in 1997 and 1998 I publicly spoke out against the actions of the Clinton Administration, which I believed was moving us once again toward war with Iraq. I believe the genesis of our current policy was unfortunately being set at that time. Indeed, many of the same voices who then demanded that the Clinton Administration attack Iraq are now demanding that the Bush Administration attack Iraq. It is unfortunate that these individuals are using the tragedy of September 11, 2001 as cover to force their long-standing desire to see an American invasion of Iraq. Despite all of the information to which I have access, I remain very skeptical that the nation of Iraq poses a serious and immanent terrorist threat to the United States. If I were convinced of such a threat I would support going to war, as I did when I supported President Bush by voting to give him both the authority and the necessary funding to fight the war on terror. [link|http://www.amenusa.org/iraq2.htm|Source] I too am unconvinced, especially given this administration's reflexively deceitful actions. Habitual, chronic and worst of all, clumsily transparent liars do not instill a sense of trust. The world is only a simple place to the simple.
|
Post #89,812
3/20/03 2:34:17 PM
|
I haven't been as overt about this aspect...
As I get carried away with it...
And I don't really like getting that way... I have been "discussing" this with my father in law since ~1992.
Just not as clearly here. It's just I have to express today else, I'll go mad.
b4k4^2
| [link|mailto:curley95@attbi.com|greg] - Grand-Master Artist in IT | | [link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry/|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] [link|http://pascal.rockford.com:8888/SSK@kQMsmc74S0Tw3KHQiRQmDem0gAIPAgM/edcurry/1//|ED'S GHOST SPEAKS!] | | [link|http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,857673,00.asp|Writing on wall, Microsoft to develop apps for Linux by 2004] | Heimatland Geheime Staatspolizei reminds:
These [link|http://www.whitehouse.gov/pcipb/cyberspace_strategy.pdf|Civilian General Orders], please memorize them.
"Questions" will be asked at safety checkpoints. |
|
Post #89,814
3/20/03 2:38:39 PM
|
Why not? He has NOT attacked any other country.
He was contained and weakened. Another 12 years and he'd STILL be contained and weakened. Another 24 years and he'd STILL be contained and weakened. Eventually, he'd die. And Iraq would have been contained. Treat your kids like this... and you get kids that will not follow your directions. Raise them for 12 years like that from being a baby... hellion on wheels in the teens (which is 1 year away) Okay, I see we've managed to lose the ORIGINAL point which was whether Iraq had any "WMD's". We are NOT "raising" Iraq therefore, your analogy fails. The BEST analogy (if you have to do it in the "other person" mode) is an adult (Iraq is certainly not a child, nor is Saddam) who is confined to a specific area. Such as being in jail. Now, if he wants to LEAVE that area, he has to change his behaviour. If he tries to fight his way out...... well, that would be similar to his invasion of Kuwait, wouldn't it? lah Blah Blah... if you can honestly say he was 100% helpful in inspecting... then why even inspect. He has already given up all the WMD he has then. Okay, just a question.... Is it POSSIBLE for ANYONE who supports this war to NOT LIE? No, I have NEVER said that he was "100% helpful in inspecting". He has the KNOWLEDGE of how to manufacture chem/bio weapons. We know this because WE funded his research. Knowledge is NOT possession, but knowledge, without inspections, can lead to possession. If you CANNOT say was 100% helpful in inspections... when do we make that deadline? 12 years... And you want 2-3 more months... he is showing more... but then that means he HASN'T complied... the deliver mechanisms with ranges greater than ??? distance are also included in the disarm resolutions... yet he still uses them... today even. Simple, the deadline is when Iraq attacks another country (that hasn't attacked Iraq first). Until that happens, we can run inspections. Are we clear yet as to why 12 years hasn't been LONG enough... or HAS it been long enough... How much longer do we need for him to comply? Wait, complying means he doesn;t have any of the excluded weapons (of MD or not) the UN has decreed. Why does he still dangle the carrot... by giving the inspectors 1 or 2 more pieces... progress... why after 12 years does he decide... Again, the sloppy thinking. Are we going to war because Saddam has rockets that can go 14 miles further than they're supposed to? Is that why we're going to kill innocent Iraqi children? If the ONLY thing that has been FOUND so far are those rockets, then WHY do we have to kill Iraqi children NOW? It's been 12 years, and all that is left are those rockets. Nothing else has been found. Here's a checklist for you: Nuclear program. Chemical weapons program. Biological weapons program. Rockets that go too far. Now, check off what has been destroyed and, so far, verified. Then explain why we couldn't wait longer. He decides mainly because there is a serious force of troops looking like they are gonna kick his ass... wouldn't you? But he still hasn't proven he has complied... only stated it. Oil wells burning presumably at the hands of the military... yet Saddam stated he would NEVER destroy the *ROYAL* Riches... like Oil wells owned by Iraq... Lies... Lies... Lies... yeah... Not "looking like they are gonna kick his ass". Bush is pushing this war and claiming that it is to prevent an IMMEDIATE THREAT. There is no immediate threat. Bush has lied about Iraq's nuclear program. Bush has lied about Iraq's chemical weapons program. And so on.
|
Post #89,823
3/20/03 3:03:17 PM
|
True...
Okay, I see we've managed to lose the ORIGINAL point which was whether Iraq had any "WMD's".
We are NOT "raising" Iraq therefore, your analogy fails. True we are not raising Iraq, but we are doing the same thing as raising it. Lack of training and use of in-action cause them to become beligerant (sp)... But, Why is it that many countries *INCLUDING* the UN (not a country but an org) come to the US to help fix things... why all of a sudden when we want something fixed they WON'T do it. It's hogwash... then WHY do we have to kill Iraqi children NOW? Why does Iraq itself do that? So I guess that makes us equal there... b4k4^2
| [link|mailto:curley95@attbi.com|greg] - Grand-Master Artist in IT | | [link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry/|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] [link|http://pascal.rockford.com:8888/SSK@kQMsmc74S0Tw3KHQiRQmDem0gAIPAgM/edcurry/1//|ED'S GHOST SPEAKS!] | | [link|http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,857673,00.asp|Writing on wall, Microsoft to develop apps for Linux by 2004] | Heimatland Geheime Staatspolizei reminds:
These [link|http://www.whitehouse.gov/pcipb/cyberspace_strategy.pdf|Civilian General Orders], please memorize them.
"Questions" will be asked at safety checkpoints. |
|
Post #89,828
3/20/03 3:18:45 PM
|
You claim we are raising Iraq?
True we are not raising Iraq, but we are doing the same thing as raising it. Lack of training and use of in-action cause them to become beligerant (sp)... Saddam is NOT an adult? I'm sure that Saddam's personality was developed LONG before now. Or haven't you read how he became the leader of Iraq? But, Why is it that many countries *INCLUDING* the UN (not a country but an org) come to the US to help fix things... why all of a sudden when we want something fixed they WON'T do it. It's hogwash... Okay, the UN is NOT asking the US to invade Iraq. In fact, the majority of the members of the UN were set to vote AGAINST the US's resolution that would have resulted in an invasion of Iraq. Or are you one of those that believe that because we helped out other countries, that they SHOULD support us even when what we want conflicts with their beliefs? It seems from your statement that you are.
|
Post #89,844
3/20/03 4:42:52 PM
|
We help them when ...
it is against our beliefs... why should they be able to not do the same.
To bad, I guess you will just have to deal with it.
b4k4^2
| [link|mailto:curley95@attbi.com|greg] - Grand-Master Artist in IT | | [link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry/|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] [link|http://pascal.rockford.com:8888/SSK@kQMsmc74S0Tw3KHQiRQmDem0gAIPAgM/edcurry/1//|ED'S GHOST SPEAKS!] | | [link|http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,857673,00.asp|Writing on wall, Microsoft to develop apps for Linux by 2004] | Heimatland Geheime Staatspolizei reminds:
These [link|http://www.whitehouse.gov/pcipb/cyberspace_strategy.pdf|Civilian General Orders], please memorize them.
"Questions" will be asked at safety checkpoints. |
|
Post #89,847
3/20/03 4:49:57 PM
|
"We help them when ... it is against our beliefs..."
I'm sure you can provide three examples of such.
Go ahead.
I say that we have NOT supported the UN when it was against our beliefs.
|
Post #89,875
3/20/03 6:27:38 PM
|
Re: True...
But, Why is it that many countries *INCLUDING* the UN (not a country but an org) come to the US to help fix things... why all of a sudden when we want something fixed they WON'T do it. It's hogwash... \r\n\r\n We (Canada) have not come to you to "fix" things for us ever in my experience. We did help you in the war in Afghanistan, in the last Gulf War, in Kosovo, and in many other conflicts over the years. The notable exception to this was the war in Vietnam; we declined to participate in that one too. Maybe you need to reexamine your understanding of the world, because the statement above is a complete crock of shit. Maybe you should ask yourself why Canada does not want to participate; it was the current party (Liberal Party of Canada) and Prime Minister (Chretien) that undertook to help in Kosovo and Afghanistan, and it was the other party (Progressive Conservative party under Brian Mulroney) that undertook to help in Gulf War I. Why do you think we are saying no this time? Maybe you should find out. \r\n\r\n Like I said in another post, the *last time* we declined to lend a hand in one of your wars was Vietnam, and we all know how well that turned out for you guys. We are the country most like yours in all the world, and you know what? we like you guys, despite the fulminations that come out from tourettic MPs from time to time. We are the closest to you in cultural mores and values of anyplace else on earth. Maybe you should be asking "Why would Canada not join with us on this one?" --\r\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\r\n* Jack Troughton jake at consultron.ca *\r\n* [link|http://consultron.ca|http://consultron.ca] [link|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] *\r\n* Kingston Ontario Canada [link|news://news.consultron.ca|news://news.consultron.ca] *\r\n-------------------------------------------------------------------
|
