Post #87,257
3/11/03 9:42:11 AM
|
Trying to breathe new life into an old domain
dtcweb.com was the very first domain name I ever registered. I now own three -- dtcweb.com, ubersoft.net, and baptistdeathray.com. Ubersoft.net and baptistdeathray.com are still in use, but dtcweb.com has become sort of a placeholder domain -- it's an email address, mostly (and, alas, mostly for spam, which is PISSING ME OFF) and used as a master domain for sites where I dither over this and that. Mostly I use it to test blogging software. I'm currently testing MovableType on it. I used it to muck about with Greymatter before I decided to use Greymatter on baptistdeathray.com.
Originally, dtcweb.com was going to be a website called Desktop Communications -- it was going to be a resource for OS/2 users who wanted to use OS/2 as a publishing platform. This was in 1997 or 1998, I think. That fell to pieces when I got more and more involved in OS/2 eZine. I'm not really involved in OS/2 eZine any more, but there aren't too many publishing applications available for OS/2 other than papyrus so there doesn't seem much point in picking up that banner either.
So I've been trying to find a use for that domain, because it seems criminal to just leave it lying about and gathering dust. But I can't think of anything to do with it.
Not that I'm demanding the community give me ideas, mind you. It's just an open forum, see, and I reckon that means "random cranks are permitted to blather out loud here about meaningless drivel here..." :)
"We are all born originals -- why is it so many of us die copies?" - Edward Young
|
Post #87,273
3/11/03 10:14:11 AM
|
Does This Count? WEBsite.
What I mean, a place for Lots-O-Useless-and-Useful-Information place for everything to coagulate...
Idunno, but a Good looking WIKI might help you get it started?!
b4k4^2
[link|mailto:curley95@attbi.com|greg] - Grand-Master Artist in IT | [link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry/|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] [link|http://pascal.rockford.com:8888/SSK@kQMsmc74S0Tw3KHQiRQmDem0gAIPAgM/edcurry/1//|ED'S GHOST SPEAKS!] | [link|http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,857673,00.asp|Writing on wall, Microsoft to develop apps for Linux by 2004] | Heimatland Geheime Staatspolizei reminds: These [link|http://www.whitehouse.gov/pcipb/cyberspace_strategy.pdf|Civilian General Orders], please memorize them. "Questions" will be asked at safety checkpoints. |
|
Post #87,280
3/11/03 10:25:15 AM
|
WIKI?
What's a WIKI?
"We are all born originals -- why is it so many of us die copies?" - Edward Young
|
Post #87,283
3/11/03 10:28:17 AM
|
This is a "twiki"... which is a form of WIKI
[link|http://twiki.iwethey.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/|IWETHEY's TWIKI]
b4k4^2
[link|mailto:curley95@attbi.com|greg] - Grand-Master Artist in IT | [link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry/|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] [link|http://pascal.rockford.com:8888/SSK@kQMsmc74S0Tw3KHQiRQmDem0gAIPAgM/edcurry/1//|ED'S GHOST SPEAKS!] | [link|http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,857673,00.asp|Writing on wall, Microsoft to develop apps for Linux by 2004] | Heimatland Geheime Staatspolizei reminds: These [link|http://www.whitehouse.gov/pcipb/cyberspace_strategy.pdf|Civilian General Orders], please memorize them. "Questions" will be asked at safety checkpoints. |
|
Post #87,288
3/11/03 10:35:32 AM
|
Hope you've got some time ...
Collaborative website tool. In general, if you can read a page you can edit it. Take a look [link|http://twiki.iwethey.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/WebHome|here] for ours. Or there's the [link|http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?WikiWikiWeb|original]. But to really lose a day or two of productivity check out [link|http://www.wikipedia.org/|WikiPedia].
===
Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
|
Post #87,303
3/11/03 11:15:12 AM
|
Gah!
I don't think I'm quite ready to do something like that. Yeek.
"We are all born originals -- why is it so many of us die copies?" - Edward Young
|
Post #87,343
3/11/03 12:54:14 PM
|
Not what I meant
I was just referring to the time sink of following links through the WikiPedia. Actually putting one up on your site is fairly straightforward. Content grows and links automatically propogate every time you touch it.
===
Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
|
Post #87,320
3/11/03 11:47:51 AM
|
Publishing software
Have you looked at [link|http://www.manglais.com|Maul]?
--\r\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\r\n* Jack Troughton jake at consultron.ca *\r\n* [link|http://consultron.ca|http://consultron.ca] [link|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] *\r\n* Kingston Ontario Canada [link|news://news.consultron.ca|news://news.consultron.ca] *\r\n-------------------------------------------------------------------
|
Post #87,356
3/11/03 1:17:34 PM
|
That's what I meant.
Maul is what I meant, I got it confused with Papyrus. And Maul is good in its way, it's sort of like Framemaker (and it's really fast and a well designed app) but it's not really a full-fledged DTP product. It doesn't support kerning, doesn't have any pre-press functionality -- the only real prepress support OS/2 has is to print to a postscript file and try to *edit* that.
A long time ago IBM made a deliberate decision not to improve the way OS/2 handled fonts, and because of that it became pretty useless for real publishing applications to flourish.
"We are all born originals -- why is it so many of us die copies?" - Edward Young
|
Post #87,387
3/11/03 2:16:56 PM
|
Tell me about it
I actually have a pretty good idea of what would be involved, and I think it could be done by a third party. It would require hooking part of the GDI* API to intercept calls to paint the screen, so that it would be possible to permit alpha blending, and then rewriting the font drivers (truetype.dll, freetype.dll, pmatm.dll) to take advantage of it. Freetype.dll would be a wash; as I understand it, it would simply be a matter of uncommenting some code in the OS/2 port and poking it at the right calls. PMATM.DLL would be a lot more work... but perhaps it could be replaced with code from other sources. The other issue would be the INCREDIBLY FUCKING STUPID limit on fontnames; 31 chars is just not enough. This part would really suck because you'd have to implement a new call instead of replacing the old one, as the structure holding the font name would have to change.
--\r\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\r\n* Jack Troughton jake at consultron.ca *\r\n* [link|http://consultron.ca|http://consultron.ca] [link|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] *\r\n* Kingston Ontario Canada [link|news://news.consultron.ca|news://news.consultron.ca] *\r\n-------------------------------------------------------------------
|