Some people seem to think....

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #87,207 by Brandioch 3/10/03 11:34:13 PM Reply	Some people seem to think.... that if you support ONE war, you must support ALL wars. Otherwise, you're a "hypocrite". This gets really old really quickly. And it tends to end in... "That war was different." "No it wasn't." "Yes it was." "No it wasn't." "Yes it was."
Post #87,213 by boxley 3/11/03 12:21:28 AM Reply	are you looking for an arguement? list the differences between the two, difference why it is ok to kill kurds but not bosnians etc. thanx, bill will work for cash and other incentives [link\|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html\|skill set] questions, help? [link\|mailto:pappas@catholic.org\|email pappas at catholic.org]</br> "If you want to meet a group of people who have a profound distrust of, and hostility toward, our legal system, don't waste your time on political radicals; interview a random selection of crime victims, and you will probably find that they make the former group look like utopian idealists by comparison." Dave Robicheaux
Post #87,368 by Brandioch 3/11/03 1:41:38 PM Reply	I'm just saying that. Some people seem to be of the opinion that if you support one war, you must support ALL wars or else you're a "hypocrite". Now I WOULD go into detail, but it would involve advanced concepts such as "verb tense".

Need Peter to fully explain this one. - (Brandioch) - (40) - March 10, 2003, 01:05:42 AM EST

Same as Powell resigning over a Rumsfeld Idea -NT - (boxley) - March 10, 2003, 08:50:23 AM EST

Re: Need Peter to fully explain this one. - (pwhysall) - (38) - March 10, 2003, 12:25:23 PM EST

Thanks. - (Brandioch) - March 10, 2003, 08:17:07 PM EST

interesting, have a question - (boxley) - (25) - March 10, 2003, 09:27:13 PM EST

My guess - (jake123) - (24) - March 10, 2003, 09:57:35 PM EST

according to the article s/bosnia/iraq -NT - (boxley) - (23) - March 10, 2003, 10:46:34 PM EST

Sorry, Hussein is not killing hundreds/day - (jake123) - (22) - March 10, 2003, 10:59:02 PM EST

horsepucky -NT - (boxley) - (18) - March 10, 2003, 11:03:17 PM EST

? -NT - (jake123) - (17) - March 10, 2003, 11:49:55 PM EST

Hussein's regime spends hours daily - (boxley) - (16) - March 11, 2003, 12:18:06 AM EST

*sigh* Why is it always up to me? - (Brandioch) - (15) - March 11, 2003, 02:09:21 PM EST

So you agree that jake123 is wrong in his title -NT - (boxley) - (14) - March 11, 2003, 02:25:22 PM EST

Okay, one again, "verb tense". "Is" or "was" or "will be". -NT - (Brandioch) - (13) - March 11, 2003, 03:38:15 PM EST

Actually, I think that is the key to your problem. - (Brandioch) - (12) - March 11, 2003, 03:45:19 PM EST

So sadaam or his crew do not torture people today - (boxley) - (11) - March 11, 2003, 04:00:38 PM EST

GOTCHA! hahahahaha - (Brandioch) - (10) - March 11, 2003, 05:08:35 PM EST

is he torturing people now? -NT - (boxley) - (9) - March 11, 2003, 05:28:09 PM EST

is he killing people now? -NT - (boxley) - (7) - March 11, 2003, 05:29:12 PM EST

is he eating his lunch now? -NT - (boxley) - (3) - March 11, 2003, 05:29:38 PM EST

Do you even have a point now -NT - (boxley) - (2) - March 11, 2003, 05:33:19 PM EST

I applied the smack down and rattled your brains loose. :D -NT - (Brandioch) - (1) - March 11, 2003, 05:59:18 PM EST

but at least I wont look like homer simpson -NT - (boxley) - March 11, 2003, 06:00:55 PM EST

Are you artificially bumping up your post count now? -NT - (pwhysall) - (2) - March 11, 2003, 05:29:57 PM EST

timestamping tense for the boy -NT - (boxley) - March 11, 2003, 05:34:55 PM EST

Suggestion: Random Bonus Post Points - (deSitter) - March 11, 2003, 08:44:38 PM EST

That wasn't the question. Do I need to repost the link? :D -NT - (Brandioch) - March 11, 2003, 05:58:35 PM EST

Some people seem to think.... - (Brandioch) - (2) - March 10, 2003, 11:34:13 PM EST

are you looking for an arguement? - (boxley) - (1) - March 11, 2003, 12:21:28 AM EST

I'm just saying that. - (Brandioch) - March 11, 2003, 01:41:38 PM EST

Re: Need Peter to fully explain this one. - (deSitter) - March 10, 2003, 10:09:31 PM EST

In other words... - (bluke) - March 11, 2003, 02:42:40 AM EST

Nuclear war??? - (bluke) - (8) - March 11, 2003, 02:46:38 AM EST

Re: Nuclear war??? - (pwhysall) - (7) - March 11, 2003, 08:05:25 AM EST

Unlikely scenario for a number of reasons - (bluke) - (4) - March 11, 2003, 08:43:09 AM EST

Antimissile systems? - (pwhysall) - (3) - March 11, 2003, 10:02:55 AM EST

naw 5 kilotons on downtown jsalem would do it - (boxley) - (2) - March 11, 2003, 10:06:50 AM EST

Actually not, only 2 out of 3 - (bluke) - March 12, 2003, 02:59:48 AM EST

Actually not, only 2 out of 3 - (bluke) - March 12, 2003, 03:03:18 AM EST

Israel cant exterminate the Palestinians - (boxley) - March 11, 2003, 09:04:05 AM EST

Oh... it won't be Israel... - (folkert) - March 11, 2003, 09:04:26 AM EST

iwethey.org

"First they came for the verbs and I said nothing, for verbing weirds language. Then they arrival for the nouns and I speech nothing, for I no verbs." - Peter Ellis
109 ms