IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Patent Wars and Antitrust Forum / Sorry Ben I'm not Buying in
Post #80,881
by andread
2/11/03 9:45:27 AM
Reply
New Sorry Ben I'm not Buying in
Ben wrote:

As pointed out there, the point of having a shill show up here is not to convert anyone, it is to pre-emptively tie people up here at key points to keep them from being active somewhere that might have more of an impact.

end quote

All that really speaks to is a personal preference that some people have for feeling a need to respond to certain stimuli

A
Play I Some Music w/ Papa Andy
Saturday 8 PM - 11 PM ET
All Night Rewind 11 PM - 5 PM
Reggae, African and Caribbean Music
[link|http://wxxe.org|Tune In]
Post #80,889
by folkert
Picture of folkert
2/11/03 9:59:36 AM
Reply
New DOH! but... but... but...
I multi-task... ;)
b4k4^2
[link|mailto:curley95@attbi.com|greg] - Grand-Master Artist in IT
[link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry/|REMEMBER ED CURRY!]   [link|http://pascal.rockford.com:8888/SSK@kQMsmc74S0Tw3KHQiRQmDem0gAIPAgM/edcurry/1//|ED'S GHOST SPEAKS!]
[link|http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,857673,00.asp|Writing on wall, Microsoft to develop apps for Linux by 2004]
Heimatland Geheime Staatspolizei reminds:
These [link|http://www.whitehouse.gov/pcipb/cyberstrategy-draft.html|Civilian General Orders], please memorize them.
"Questions" will be asked at safety checkpoints.
Post #81,046
by ben_tilly
2/11/03 10:14:01 PM
Reply
New Ironically informative
If you meant that as an explanation of shill-like behaviour, then I don't buy it.

But it was perfect as an explanation of a principle that a good shill or troll can use to maximize the effect of spending a small amount of energy.

Cheers,
Ben
"good ideas and bad code build communities, the other three combinations do not"
- [link|http://archives.real-time.com/pipermail/cocoon-devel/2000-October/003023.html|Stefano Mazzocchi]
     MSN.com sabotaging Opera - (marlowe) - (46) - Feb. 5, 2003, 04:48:36 PM EST
         Hey deSitter, still think they've "changed"? -NT - (mmoffitt) - Feb. 5, 2003, 06:50:51 PM EST
         Whoop more MS nonsense - (orion) - Feb. 5, 2003, 10:53:57 PM EST
         what else is new - (SpiceWare) - (5) - Feb. 5, 2003, 11:44:17 PM EST
             Works for me. - (admin) - (4) - Feb. 6, 2003, 10:29:43 AM EST
                 interesting - (SpiceWare) - (3) - Feb. 6, 2003, 11:53:02 AM EST
                     This is a long standing Microsoft technique - (Andrew Grygus) - (2) - Feb. 6, 2003, 02:16:35 PM EST
                         a huge market Microsoft dearly wants to dominate. - (folkert) - (1) - Feb. 6, 2003, 04:16:52 PM EST
                             Probably. But this one is a little special. - (static) - Feb. 7, 2003, 06:04:32 AM EST
         So? - (static) - Feb. 6, 2003, 06:17:35 AM EST
         Re: MSN.com sabotaging Opera - (andread) - (35) - Feb. 6, 2003, 11:34:50 AM EST
             Re: MSN.com sabotaging Opera - (admin) - (1) - Feb. 6, 2003, 11:51:47 AM EST
                 Nevermind that man behind the curtain... he means NOTHING... - (folkert) - Feb. 6, 2003, 04:12:57 PM EST
             Shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill! -NT - (CRConrad) - Feb. 6, 2003, 03:50:24 PM EST
             Oops - ignore this one -NT - (ben_tilly) - Feb. 6, 2003, 08:01:09 PM EST
             You are a little short on reading comprehension? - (ben_tilly) - (30) - Feb. 6, 2003, 08:00:33 PM EST
                 One More Time - (andread) - (29) - Feb. 7, 2003, 05:22:29 PM EST
                     Opera 7.0 identifies itself as *compatible* with IE 6.0 - (admin) - Feb. 7, 2003, 05:37:55 PM EST
                     What Scott said. - (static) - Feb. 7, 2003, 07:36:04 PM EST
                     And you still claim you're not shill-ing for MS? Bah! -NT - (CRConrad) - (26) - Feb. 8, 2003, 06:24:51 PM EST
                         Grandiose Delusions - (andread) - (25) - Feb. 9, 2003, 08:30:21 AM EST
                             I'll give you a good reason to care about us - (ben_tilly) - (24) - Feb. 9, 2003, 09:50:47 AM EST
                                 Re: I'll give you a good reason to care about us - (andread) - (23) - Feb. 9, 2003, 01:49:50 PM EST
                                     and it wouldnt be the same without ya -NT - (boxley) - Feb. 9, 2003, 02:06:01 PM EST
                                     Do you have direct control of a webserver? - (folkert) - Feb. 9, 2003, 02:33:27 PM EST
                                     Agent string - (kmself) - (11) - Feb. 9, 2003, 03:26:52 PM EST
                                         Heh. You called him "Andrea". Andy doesn't like that. ;-) -NT - (Another Scott) - Feb. 9, 2003, 04:02:09 PM EST
                                         Re: Agent string - (jb4) - (9) - Feb. 11, 2003, 02:08:22 PM EST
                                             Check the TWiki - (drewk) - Feb. 11, 2003, 03:09:02 PM EST
                                             Just understand--some sites will break... - (tseliot) - (7) - Feb. 11, 2003, 04:34:05 PM EST
                                                 Changing the string doesn't break sites.... - (kmself) - (6) - Feb. 12, 2003, 01:28:21 AM EST
                                                     Uh...yeah. - (tseliot) - (5) - Feb. 12, 2003, 12:26:58 PM EST
                                                         Lemme guess... Educational?? - (folkert) - (2) - Feb. 12, 2003, 02:10:06 PM EST
                                                             Buh...not educational. - (tseliot) - (1) - Feb. 12, 2003, 03:27:20 PM EST
                                                                 No... - (folkert) - Feb. 12, 2003, 04:18:23 PM EST
                                                         Microsoft is boiling the frogs again.... - (kmself) - (1) - Feb. 15, 2003, 02:46:33 AM EST
                                                             Re: Microsoft is boiling the frogs again.... - (jake123) - Feb. 15, 2003, 02:11:31 PM EST
                                     Misunderstandings repeated - (ben_tilly) - (8) - Feb. 9, 2003, 05:11:24 PM EST
                                         Feh - what's to say other than Andrea Dear *is* Squidley? -NT - (CRConrad) - Feb. 9, 2003, 06:04:56 PM EST
                                         Re: Misunderstandings repeated - (andread) - (6) - Feb. 10, 2003, 12:49:12 PM EST
                                             Did you ever follow the link above? - (ben_tilly) - (5) - Feb. 10, 2003, 01:58:20 PM EST
                                                 ICLRPD (new thread) - (drewk) - Feb. 10, 2003, 02:14:06 PM EST
                                                 Signs? What signs?!? -NT - (CRConrad) - Feb. 10, 2003, 04:09:57 PM EST
                                                 Sorry Ben I'm not Buying in - (andread) - (2) - Feb. 11, 2003, 09:45:27 AM EST
                                                     DOH! but... but... but... - (folkert) - Feb. 11, 2003, 09:59:36 AM EST
                                                     Ironically informative - (ben_tilly) - Feb. 11, 2003, 10:14:01 PM EST
         Easy enough to do - (orion) - Feb. 6, 2003, 10:55:59 PM EST

Reason! Won't you put your blue dress on?
77 ms