IWETHEY v. 0.3.0
|
TODO
1,095 registered users | 0
active users
| 0 LpH |
Statistics
Login
|
Create New User
Welcome to IWETHEY!
IWETHEY Home
/
IWETHEY Board
/
Linux Forum
/
whatever
Post #78,550
by
bepatient
1/31/03 10:16:10 PM
Reply
whatever
You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday!
Laurie Anderson
[link|mailto:bepatient@aol.com|BePatient]
The push to Advanced Server begins
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (117)
- Jan. 28, 2003, 06:41:53 AM EST
Shrug.
- (
pwhysall
)
- (5)
- Jan. 28, 2003, 07:26:28 AM EST
Not a solution for all . .
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (4)
- Jan. 28, 2003, 11:04:38 AM EST
It's probably 99%
- (
kmself
)
- (3)
- Jan. 28, 2003, 01:44:19 PM EST
Of course it'll run fine on other distros . .
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (2)
- Jan. 28, 2003, 02:08:54 PM EST
I have run into the same issues on support contracts
- (
boxley
)
- Jan. 28, 2003, 02:39:14 PM EST
It's a free market
- (
kmself
)
- Jan. 28, 2003, 02:39:43 PM EST
Re: The push to Advanced Server begins
- (
rickmoen
)
- (84)
- Jan. 28, 2003, 01:04:05 PM EST
Re: The push to Advanced Server begins
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (83)
- Jan. 28, 2003, 02:40:35 PM EST
Right on, Andrew.
- (
tseliot
)
- (22)
- Jan. 28, 2003, 04:22:46 PM EST
Oh great, here come the cheerleaders
- (
rickmoen
)
- (21)
- Jan. 28, 2003, 08:52:50 PM EST
come on Rick have you ever, never met a client
- (
boxley
)
- (4)
- Jan. 28, 2003, 09:20:09 PM EST
Re: come on Rick have you ever, never met a client
- (
rickmoen
)
- (3)
- Jan. 28, 2003, 10:26:59 PM EST
Thanks, my point is customers will not stray from
- (
boxley
)
- (2)
- Jan. 28, 2003, 10:41:25 PM EST
Re: Thanks, my point is customers will not stray from
- (
rickmoen
)
- (1)
- Jan. 28, 2003, 10:49:10 PM EST
Sorry I think we are badly miscommunicating, forget it
-NT
- (
boxley
)
- Jan. 28, 2003, 10:54:23 PM EST
You're in an alternate reality
- (
tonytib
)
- (7)
- Jan. 28, 2003, 09:32:52 PM EST
Re: You're in an alternate reality
- (
rickmoen
)
- (3)
- Jan. 28, 2003, 10:41:14 PM EST
No, you keep missing the point
- (
tonytib
)
- (1)
- Jan. 29, 2003, 12:20:47 AM EST
Re: No, you keep missing the point
- (
rickmoen
)
- Jan. 29, 2003, 10:18:09 AM EST
How to intentionally miss a point (new thread)
- (
drewk
)
- Jan. 29, 2003, 08:52:34 AM EST
Re: You're in an alternate reality
- (
deSitter
)
- (2)
- Jan. 29, 2003, 05:14:07 AM EST
Vertical market vs horizontal
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (1)
- Jan. 29, 2003, 05:56:36 AM EST
Nice description.
- (
static
)
- Jan. 31, 2003, 05:24:11 AM EST
Oh great, here comes the one-man-band.
- (
tseliot
)
- (7)
- Jan. 29, 2003, 03:07:02 PM EST
Re: Oh great, here comes the one-man-band.
- (
rickmoen
)
- (6)
- Jan. 29, 2003, 03:43:36 PM EST
Will, should, doesn't matter.
- (
tseliot
)
- (5)
- Jan. 29, 2003, 04:37:28 PM EST
Re: Will, should, doesn't matter.
- (
rickmoen
)
- (4)
- Jan. 29, 2003, 05:22:10 PM EST
Small gain, indeed.
- (
tseliot
)
- (3)
- Jan. 29, 2003, 06:22:28 PM EST
Re: Small gain, indeed.
- (
rickmoen
)
- (2)
- Jan. 29, 2003, 09:17:50 PM EST
Apology:
- (
tseliot
)
- (1)
- Jan. 31, 2003, 12:22:12 AM EST
Think nothing of it.
- (
rickmoen
)
- Jan. 31, 2003, 12:25:31 AM EST
Re: The push to Advanced Server begins
- (
deSitter
)
- (59)
- Jan. 29, 2003, 04:43:35 AM EST
Software drive OS selection
- (
tuberculosis
)
- (58)
- Jan. 29, 2003, 08:09:56 AM EST
Total agreement
- (
tonytib
)
- (56)
- Jan. 29, 2003, 11:25:47 AM EST
Re: Total agreement
- (
rickmoen
)
- (2)
- Jan. 29, 2003, 11:39:11 AM EST
Apple is backing away from Java
- (
tuberculosis
)
- (1)
- Jan. 29, 2003, 03:10:20 PM EST
Re: Apple is backing away from Java
- (
rickmoen
)
- Jan. 29, 2003, 03:30:29 PM EST
The Software Desert
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (52)
- Jan. 29, 2003, 01:20:56 PM EST
Re: The Software Desert
- (
rickmoen
)
- (51)
- Jan. 29, 2003, 01:54:33 PM EST
It's people like you that do more harm than good
- (
tonytib
)
- (2)
- Jan. 29, 2003, 02:35:03 PM EST
Re: It's people like you that do more harm than good
- (
rickmoen
)
- (1)
- Jan. 29, 2003, 02:59:07 PM EST
Nope, you're a troll...or an idiot (can't read, can't answer
-NT
- (
tonytib
)
- Jan. 29, 2003, 03:39:49 PM EST
LDAP?
- (
tuberculosis
)
- (2)
- Jan. 29, 2003, 03:33:49 PM EST
Give it up, he hasn't learned to read yet
-NT
- (
tonytib
)
- Jan. 29, 2003, 03:40:42 PM EST
Well I suppose you could always use Radius for CM
- (
boxley
)
- Jan. 29, 2003, 03:59:31 PM EST
Well, i's pretty evident . .
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (43)
- Jan. 29, 2003, 04:43:49 PM EST
Re: Well, i's pretty evident . .
- (
rickmoen
)
- (42)
- Jan. 29, 2003, 05:30:55 PM EST
Lemme second an opinion...
- (
bepatient
)
- (33)
- Jan. 29, 2003, 06:07:34 PM EST
Re: Lemme second an opinion...
- (
rickmoen
)
- (32)
- Jan. 29, 2003, 09:26:09 PM EST
Generally it is safe to presume . . .
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (18)
- Jan. 29, 2003, 10:24:20 PM EST
Re: Generally it is safe to presume . . .
- (
rickmoen
)
- (17)
- Jan. 29, 2003, 10:35:34 PM EST
It's the height of arrogance . .
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (16)
- Jan. 29, 2003, 11:19:08 PM EST
Re: It's the height of arrogance . .
- (
rickmoen
)
- (15)
- Jan. 29, 2003, 11:45:03 PM EST
Your ability to descend into absurdity is truly amazing!
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (14)
- Jan. 30, 2003, 12:38:32 AM EST
Ow....
- (
folkert
)
- (13)
- Jan. 30, 2003, 09:19:06 AM EST
Re: Ow....
- (
rickmoen
)
- (12)
- Jan. 30, 2003, 03:39:59 PM EST
Simple Question
- (
deSitter
)
- (11)
- Jan. 30, 2003, 04:29:06 PM EST
Remember to include
- (
imric
)
- Jan. 30, 2003, 04:40:15 PM EST
ps. Of course
- (
imric
)
- Jan. 30, 2003, 04:42:53 PM EST
call Andrew and get his
-NT
- (
boxley
)
- (2)
- Jan. 30, 2003, 05:00:17 PM EST
OK
- (
pwhysall
)
- (1)
- Jan. 30, 2003, 05:04:01 PM EST
Sorry, Desit asked for replacement of Great Plains
- (
boxley
)
- Jan. 30, 2003, 05:43:43 PM EST
AppGen
- (
folkert
)
- (5)
- Jan. 30, 2003, 08:50:41 PM EST
Re: AppGen
- (
deSitter
)
- (2)
- Jan. 30, 2003, 10:01:04 PM EST
Yes... it does work.
- (
folkert
)
- Jan. 30, 2003, 10:19:02 PM EST
Give the Gryg a call I am sure he would be willing to answer
- (
boxley
)
- Jan. 30, 2003, 10:21:57 PM EST
Appgen Custom Suite . .
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (1)
- Jan. 30, 2003, 11:12:46 PM EST
Yes... all three...
- (
folkert
)
- Jan. 31, 2003, 12:03:24 AM EST
Damn, now ACT! is an OS???
- (
bepatient
)
- (12)
- Jan. 30, 2003, 06:34:56 AM EST
Re: Damn, now ACT! is an OS???
- (
rickmoen
)
- (11)
- Jan. 30, 2003, 07:28:15 AM EST
Figured as much.
- (
bepatient
)
- (10)
- Jan. 30, 2003, 08:07:31 AM EST
Re: Figured as much.
- (
rickmoen
)
- (9)
- Jan. 30, 2003, 03:31:06 PM EST
You didn't?
- (
bepatient
)
- (8)
- Jan. 30, 2003, 06:42:41 PM EST
With apologies...
- (
admin
)
- (3)
- Jan. 30, 2003, 06:48:18 PM EST
Ahh, the good ole days
- (
boxley
)
- Jan. 30, 2003, 06:58:20 PM EST
Oh dear...
- (
bepatient
)
- Jan. 30, 2003, 08:41:06 PM EST
I have a bad feeling about that...
- (
static
)
- Jan. 31, 2003, 05:31:11 AM EST
Re: You didn't?
- (
rickmoen
)
- (3)
- Jan. 30, 2003, 11:36:39 PM EST
Maybe my universal translator is broken.
- (
bepatient
)
- (2)
- Jan. 31, 2003, 12:10:33 PM EST
Re: Maybe my universal translator is broken.
- (
rickmoen
)
- (1)
- Jan. 31, 2003, 04:29:18 PM EST
whatever
-NT
- (
bepatient
)
- Jan. 31, 2003, 10:16:10 PM EST
Sorry buddy - can't stick with Windows . .
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (7)
- Jan. 29, 2003, 06:35:52 PM EST
AppGen...
- (
folkert
)
- (2)
- Jan. 29, 2003, 07:14:36 PM EST
My Appgen experience is with . . .
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (1)
- Jan. 29, 2003, 07:31:15 PM EST
Yeah... that's the one...
- (
folkert
)
- Jan. 29, 2003, 07:49:53 PM EST
Re: Sorry buddy - can't stick with Windows . .
- (
rickmoen
)
- Jan. 29, 2003, 09:31:33 PM EST
Re: Sorry buddy - can't stick with Windows . .
- (
deSitter
)
- (2)
- Jan. 31, 2003, 01:08:50 AM EST
Appgen
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (1)
- Jan. 31, 2003, 02:10:09 AM EST
Thanks... I could not have said it better...
- (
folkert
)
- Jan. 31, 2003, 07:13:59 AM EST
Did Andrew ask what you used? (new thread)
- (
Another Scott
)
- Jan. 30, 2003, 03:47:50 PM EST
As to capitalism..
- (
deSitter
)
- Jan. 29, 2003, 03:34:35 PM EST
The push to Advanced Workstation begins
- (
folkert
)
- (9)
- Jan. 30, 2003, 09:54:32 PM EST
Yup, looks like Red Hat is responding to the outcry.
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (8)
- Jan. 30, 2003, 11:26:10 PM EST
Re: Yup, looks like Red Hat is responding to the outcry.
- (
rickmoen
)
- (7)
- Jan. 30, 2003, 11:39:03 PM EST
come on squeek, there is a perfectly good flame area
- (
boxley
)
- (6)
- Jan. 30, 2003, 11:48:13 PM EST
Re: come on squeek, there is a perfectly good flame area
- (
rickmoen
)
- (5)
- Jan. 31, 2003, 12:20:42 AM EST
My dear squeek
- (
boxley
)
- Jan. 31, 2003, 12:36:19 AM EST
Stoop - or just low all the time?
- (
tuberculosis
)
- (3)
- Jan. 31, 2003, 08:13:03 AM EST
Re: Stoop - or just low all the time?
- (
rickmoen
)
- (2)
- Jan. 31, 2003, 04:24:27 PM EST
Boy you're a slow learner
- (
tuberculosis
)
- (1)
- Jan. 31, 2003, 07:41:11 PM EST
Re: Boy you're a slow learner
- (
rickmoen
)
- Feb. 1, 2003, 02:04:03 AM EST
My 2 cents
- (
broomberg
)
- (15)
- Feb. 1, 2003, 07:33:55 PM EST
That's why monopoly is so easy.
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (8)
- Feb. 1, 2003, 09:48:29 PM EST
Disagree
- (
broomberg
)
- (7)
- Feb. 2, 2003, 01:35:14 AM EST
No, you cannot make a choice and move on.
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (1)
- Feb. 2, 2003, 12:52:56 PM EST
Not worthy of a response
- (
broomberg
)
- Feb. 2, 2003, 03:42:19 PM EST
I don't buy your arguement here Broom...
- (
folkert
)
- (3)
- Feb. 2, 2003, 02:47:50 PM EST
Yes you do
- (
broomberg
)
- (2)
- Feb. 2, 2003, 03:46:08 PM EST
What I mean by tweaking...
- (
folkert
)
- (1)
- Feb. 2, 2003, 03:55:30 PM EST
See, we DO agree
- (
broomberg
)
- Feb. 2, 2003, 04:35:14 PM EST
pragmatic vs logical decision
- (
boxley
)
- Feb. 2, 2003, 04:36:20 PM EST
Re: My 2 cents
- (
rickmoen
)
- (5)
- Feb. 2, 2003, 02:12:47 AM EST
Out of context
- (
broomberg
)
- (4)
- Feb. 3, 2003, 12:02:25 AM EST
Re: Out of context
- (
rickmoen
)
- (3)
- Feb. 3, 2003, 01:37:58 AM EST
Missed it again
- (
broomberg
)
- (2)
- Feb. 3, 2003, 09:05:22 AM EST
Now hang on a minit thar buddy...
- (
folkert
)
- (1)
- Feb. 3, 2003, 11:11:02 AM EST
Sorry, this thread is dead
- (
broomberg
)
- Feb. 3, 2003, 12:21:31 PM EST
i
we
they
.org
Thank GOD you finished that sentence.
324 ms