tseliot wrote:
Nobody blinks an eye because those "other areas" are managed, as Andrew said, in what have become standard, one might say to the point of being intuitive, ways.
To you, managed. To me, pretty broken. Fortunately, neither of us needs to be especially concerned about the other's view, right?
Ummm..we were talking about minimizing risk. Can you not connect the dots between risk and damage?
You're either being very vague, changing the subject, or both.
Social tip: if you find the opinion of your chosen adversary laughable, chance are you've misunderstood his opinion.
Or maybe I understand his opinion, think he's trying to troll a technical audience by deliberately dangling purblind arguments in front of it, and find the practice tiresome.
The issue which *Andrew* brought up, before he was so rudely interrupted, is that support lifetimes are getting shorter. Go to linuxcare's website and look around. They don't want to support anything other than the current versions any more than the vendors themselves do.
Well, when the "versions" in question are of a freely redistributable operating system that's available for the cost of duplication, the relevance of this point is unclear. Andrew tried to muddy this obvious point by mixing in RHAS, but that is not relevant.
My point hinged more on your unbelievable assertion that, if a business doesn't perceive the world the way you do, they should wither and die.
I believe what I said was that if a business doesn't perceive the world the way it is, that they probably will wither and die. Such as by refusing to avail themselves of a la carte support when it's the obvious choice, because, well, they never have before and they just don't want to. But please don't let me stop you from constructing straw men and knocking them down at great length. It could be quite entertaining.
Rick Moen
rick@linuxmafia.com